- Joined
- Mar 31, 2024
- Messages
- 744
- Supports
- Barcelona
We've all watched them both. Obviously people see and/or appreciate different things when they watch footballFirstly, when I say Messi is better, I mean it. I dont support Barcelona, i am Man Utd through and through. If you look at my top 10 list, I have Cristiano at 5th but it baffles me whenever anyone says Cristiano is equal to or better than Messi because I have watched them both.
Infact, during his early years when Cristiano was on the recieving end of alot of stick, i used to defend him on forums, amogsr fans and in banter with fans of rival teams insisting that he'd come good which he did. Majority who support Cristiano are those who support Man Utd, Real Madrid, Juventus, and the Portuguese national team. Also, like Beckham, Cristisno is a celebrity/brand beyond football far more than Messi. That would explain the cult like following and millions claiming he is greater. My own family are Cristiano fans only because they are all United fans and the arguments are generic.
OK
His lifestyle without the injuries wouldn't have prevented him from having at least a decade of high level performances, because he was so good. We've seem plenty of other players with bad lifestyles be good for a decent amount of time (Best, Maradona etc.). The issue was the injuries, not the lifestyle. He missed almost 2 years due to the knee injuries, and when he came back, he wasn't the same.Secondly, R9 is also on my top 10 list rationale being the success with Brazil and 2 great seasons all of which occured within 5 years. My argument against putting him near the top is his lack of longevity; some put him as high as fourth which I believe is based on "what could have been", a very difficult prediction to make given his very bad lifestyle.