Rednotdead
New Member
Daily Mail was saying £7m. Either way, best for both Man Utd and the player that they go their separate ways.
Having an English passport goes a long way.
No, I agree with you and was at first mighty surprised we were even getting money for him, let alone £9m. All I'm saying is similar shite/average players like McCormack and Livermore have gone for similar amounts or more. I can sort of now understand why Villa and Hull are interested in paying for a PL-winning England international.
That was the risk we took in leaving our business until the last few days of the window.We could go to Burnley with only Fletcher available in CM.
For big clubs yes because they have to keep homegrown quota in Europe. I'd say Villa's chances of making serious impact in Europe are non-existent and they have a pretty solid English backbone as far as I remember so another English player isn't worth as much to them as he'd be to City or Chelsea. £9m is ridiculous for a player who has been out of form for a long time and generally isn't all that. £5m would probably be maximum I'd pay in their position.
I guess the new TV deal has made PL clubs more eager to spend money.
He's Vice Captain. Not going to be sold any time soon.If we're selling Cleverley what does this mean for Fletcher? He shouldn't be playing either.
I think we could be on the verge of seeing the smaller top flight clubs up their spending, to conincide with the increase of what 50 million could get you years ago, compared to now. 11m for ROSS MCCORMACK ffs...
He is beyond the point of reparation. The quality just isn't there.I'm actually quite disappointed. I wanted LVG to improve some of the homegrown lads. I guess Welbeck is next.
Maybe can do that with the next batch.I'm actually quite disappointed. I wanted LVG to improve some of the homegrown lads. I guess Welbeck is next.
I'm actually quite disappointed. I wanted LVG to improve some of the homegrown lads. I guess Welbeck is next.
True. It is a matter of a couple of years before the likes of Villa, Southampton etc. start spending £25m on a player. Everton paid £28m for Lukaku, twice their previous record.
Fletcher's okay to keep around the place, he's got a great attitude and everyone respects him.
Even if he doesn't add any value on the pitch, he adds some off it, unlike Cleverley.
Yeah, it's a bit unfair, I agree.The hate for Cleverley is unbelievable. He never became the player we all wanted him to be but some of the flack he gets...you'd think he played for Liverpool. I don't even think Daniel Sturridge gets the same level of abuse of the CAF as Cleverley.
Yeah according to SSN, we also got £2.5m for Bebe and £4.4m for Buttner. Sold Tom, Buttner and Bebe to cover for Rojo's fees.Well done Ed, pays too much for playes but also gets too much for players it seems, wish Tom the best but he is just no United quality.
Yeah according to SSN, we also got £2.5m for Bebe and £4.4m for Buttner. Sold Tom, Buttner and Bebe to cover for Rojo's fees.
If we keep all the deadwood, we can't even promote from within the club. Fletcher was never going to be sold due to his seniority in the club and after that being name vice captain.You're all quite cringeworthy. Getting all giddy over £9m.
At this point out of Fletcher and Cleverley, I'd rather Cleverely stayed.
I wish him luck though. Hope he does well at Villa.
You're all quite cringeworthy. Getting all giddy over £9m.
At this point out of Fletcher and Cleverley, I'd rather Cleverely stayed.
I wish him luck though. Hope he does well at Villa.
We're not going to sell a guy a week after he's been appointed VC, and on top of that one of the few CMs we have left.If we're selling Cleverley what does this mean for Fletcher? He shouldn't be playing either.
It was only ever going to be a matter of time really, the inflation in football only for a time seemed to be happing to world class or top class players, not it's begging to filter down.