U.S. beef farming practices often contravene with EU regulations due to several key differences in food safety, animal welfare, and environmental standards. Some of the main points of conflict include:
- Hormone-Treated Beef – The EU bans the use of growth hormones in beef production, whereas the U.S. widely uses hormone implants to promote growth efficiency. The EU considers hormone-treated beef a health risk, while the U.S. argues there is no scientific basis for the ban.
- Use of Ractopamine – Ractopamine, a beta-agonist used to promote lean muscle growth in cattle, is prohibited in the EU due to animal welfare and food safety concerns, but it is commonly used in the U.S.
- Antibiotics in Farming – The EU has stricter regulations on antibiotic use in livestock, primarily to combat antimicrobial resistance. The U.S. allows more extensive use of antibiotics for growth promotion and disease prevention.
- Animal Welfare Standards – The EU has higher standards for animal welfare, including space requirements, access to pasture, and transportation conditions. U.S. industrial feedlots (CAFOs) often do not meet these standards.
- Traceability and Food Safety – The EU requires detailed farm-to-fork traceability for beef products, while U.S. traceability systems are less stringent.
- Environmental Regulations – The EU enforces stricter environmental rules regarding greenhouse gas emissions, manure management, and land use in livestock farming, while U.S. regulations are often more lenient.
Because of these differences, U.S. beef does not easily meet EU import standards, leading to trade restrictions and disputes between the two regions
As for other things, like GM crops, not a chance the EU will allow that and it shouldn't either. The US has the worst standards of industrialized nations (not sure about China but seen some terror stories there too) when it comes to agriculture. It is known that the EU wins the agricultural race (between the two) because the standards are just much higher.