The Trump Presidency - Part 2



Very predictable.

Having worked in the public sector, there's for sure plenty of ways that things could be optimised. However, in my experience this usually involved an external audit which resulted in major changes which in turn made things worse - because they didnt really understand how things worked, and sought only for an immediate result in the couple metrics they were measuring, without proper consideration of all the other impacts. It's bad enough paying a small fortune to consultants, but even more batshit insane to have a quick fire review and widescale terminations by people with little to no knowledge of how things operate.

Genuine improvement in public services requires MONEY to improve upon ancient systems that aren't fit for purpose. Perhaps some (careful) cutting of red tape/restrictions. Some strucutral and policy changes. Recruitment and training needs tweaking. Staff retention and progression needs improving. Pay people shit, and don't provide them routes of progression which BUILD upon their existing experience, and they don't stay. For example, a big problem is that many "promotions" in the public sector can't stipulate that you need specific knowledge/experience in that line of work. So people jump from one department to another because its the only/best option for promotion, which means the department loses a ton of experience, the employee now has wasted knowledge they no longer need, the new department has to train the new employee, and then people beneath them in the hierarchy have a superior who isn't familiar with the line of work and is going to make mistakes.

Edit (UK specific I'm talking about)
 
What's stunning for me is that those who supported Trump are not actually inclined to backtrack on their support at all. Pretty much anyone that I know who I had known to like Trump before that I have spoken with since Jan 20 is very happy with his work so far, and most of them are impressed with the job Musk has done as well. Basically these people seem to have no perspective at all. Spoke with my co-worker the other day and he was banging on about how Musk is going to save the US and lay out a template for other countries to follow.
They backtrack when it finally impacts them. For example, when their meds are now extortionately priced again or when they lose their federal jobs.
 
So many leopards. they always meant for others to be shafted, not their precious daughters and sons. Obviously her daughter is not DEI, only other daughters. Me likes a bit of Schadenfreude
There's one or two of us in here that will "enjoy" it
 
They backtrack when it finally impacts them. For example, when their meds are now extortionately priced again or when they lose their federal jobs.
They won't. I have MAGA in my family and they will make excuses and blame woke dei transgender illegal aliens all the way until they die of diabetic shock, unemployed and shivering in their unheated shack while soullessly staring at Fox News.
 
That's gone now. The one thing he was convicted for has amounted to no punishment at all. The others have been dismissed apart from the Georgia case, which will get dropped soon.
Not quite so, the charges can be brought again, though probably unlikely
 
They won't. I have MAGA in my family and they will make excuses and blame woke dei transgender illegal aliens all the way until they die of diabetic shock, unemployed and shivering in their unheated shack while soullessly staring at Fox News.
I can think of 1 or 2 in my extended family where exactly that will happen!
 

The amount of actual and potential security breaches under Trump's first term and this one will be epic when it's all said and done. Once again, imagine if a Dem had but one of these stories. Imagine Obama or Clinton storing government docs in bathroom for instance. Or don't forget the clandestine officers who were exposed in his first term.
 
Last edited:
There's one or two of us in here that will "enjoy" it

I don't enjoy people losing jobs, I enjoy people that voted for it thinking that they were special and it was not going for them

- People that said about government waste
- People that believe that women, other races, sexual orientation, gender dysphoria, etc... don't deserve positive discrimination like DEI and then they claim when they are sacked that they were not hired because DEI
- People that voted because "too much immigration" and then they deport them, or their family or their friends
- etc

All this people that believed that their vote would not affect them but other people with their exact profile. Just because they are special and it doesn't go with them. They one to feck others and they get feck.
 
I don't enjoy people losing jobs, I enjoy people that voted for it thinking that they were special and it was not going for them

- People that said about government waste
- People that believe that women, other races, sexual orientation, gender dysphoria, etc... don't deserve positive discrimination like DEI and then they claim when they are sacked that they were not hired because DEI
- People that voted because "too much immigration" and then they deport them, or their family or their friends
- etc

All this people that believed that their vote would not affect them but other people with their exact profile. Just because they are special and it doesn't go with them. They one to feck others and they get feck.
That's why I had enjoy in quotes - I don't disagree with what you say
 
They were always going to do this. Run on waste (expenditure) and then reveal that what they mean by waste are things which are crucial for poor people as they give tax-cuts to the billionaire class. It's the same old neoliberalist shite with a totalitarian bent to it.
 
Looks like a totally fake account. But probably happening everywhere.

i don't think it's fake. there are tweets going back months, talking about meeting the daughter (who voted for kamala) for thanksgiving.
 
Very predictable.

Having worked in the public sector, there's for sure plenty of ways that things could be optimised. However, in my experience this usually involved an external audit which resulted in major changes which in turn made things worse - because they didnt really understand how things worked, and sought only for an immediate result in the couple metrics they were measuring, without proper consideration of all the other impacts. It's bad enough paying a small fortune to consultants, but even more batshit insane to have a quick fire review and widescale terminations by people with little to no knowledge of how things operate.

Genuine improvement in public services requires MONEY to improve upon ancient systems that aren't fit for purpose. Perhaps some (careful) cutting of red tape/restrictions. Some strucutral and policy changes. Recruitment and training needs tweaking. Staff retention and progression needs improving. Pay people shit, and don't provide them routes of progression which BUILD upon their existing experience, and they don't stay. For example, a big problem is that many "promotions" in the public sector can't stipulate that you need specific knowledge/experience in that line of work. So people jump from one department to another because its the only/best option for promotion, which means the department loses a ton of experience, the employee now has wasted knowledge they no longer need, the new department has to train the new employee, and then people beneath them in the hierarchy have a superior who isn't familiar with the line of work and is going to make mistakes.

Edit (UK specific I'm talking about)
They are literally deleting websites with the word diversity (so, biodiversity is gone too), firing everyone on probation (which means they got the job or promotion less than a year ago), and tried to offer retirement/buyouts to anyone who would take them.

Exactly the opposite of what you said. Broadest most crude methods possible - horrible to make things efficient, perfect to make things so dysfunctional they will be privatised.
 
They are literally deleting websites with the word diversity (so, biodiversity is gone too), firing everyone on probation (which means they got the job or promotion less than a year ago), and tried to offer retirement/buyouts to anyone who would take them.

Exactly the opposite of what you said. Broadest most crude methods possible - horrible to make things efficient, perfect to make things so dysfunctional they will be privatised.
SES employees probation can be longer than that. As much as 3 years - to make it even more fecked up.