Really not sure, what makes you so sure of that statement.
The games he played.
Really not sure, what makes you so sure of that statement.
The games he played.
I watch Lazio a lot and whilst he's a good player, he wouldn't be the best CM to partner Pogba and he's nowhere near Pogba himself so, even though I like him, I don't think it'd be the most sensible signing.SMS forgot all about that mug. I remember people saying we should swap Pogba for him.
You haven't seen him for Villareal then or certain games he played for Atletico. Otherwise this doesn't make sense at all.
I have and I don't think that there is a moment where you can say that he controls games.
Atletico don't play to control the game so its a weird conversation to be having. They play against teams like Leganes (14th) at home and have 44.6% of the ball
Thats their gameplan. To draw the opponents onto them and defend well then use the wide players and forwards to score on the break. So nobody controls midfield for Atletico because that would make them less effective.
Who would you compare him to?
Atletico don't play to control the game so its a weird conversation to be having. They play against teams like Leganes (14th) at home and have 44.6% of the ball
Thats their gameplan. To draw the opponents onto them and defend well then use the wide players and forwards to score on the break. So nobody controls midfield for Atletico because that would make them less effective.
They're quite good at adapting to their opponents. I've seen them control games with the opposition barely getting out of their half this season, and Rodrigo and Partey have both been key to that. Obviously that isn't their main gameplan, but they are capable of doing it.Atletico don't play to control the game so its a weird conversation to be having. They play against teams like Leganes (14th) at home and have 44.6% of the ball
Thats their gameplan. To draw the opponents onto them and defend well then use the wide players and forwards to score on the break. So nobody controls midfield for Atletico because that would make them less effective.
Saul is about 10 times better on the ball than Herrera. A bit of exaggeration maybe but i guess you get my point.Herrera mk2. don't need more workhorses. we're looking for good on the ball players.
Raid Germany. Someone who can play ball in the middle of the park and someone creative like Havertz/Brandt of Bayer Leverkusen. Prices never seem to be as bad buying from Germany either!
And that's pretty much my point, the CMs don't control games and in the rare occasion when it's needed neither Partey nor Rodri have been able to do it efficiently. All the playmaking relies on Saul, Koke, Griezmann, Correa or Lemar depending on who is on the field.
Though Gabi in his best years would do it.
There's just the problem of Bayern. Most German players prefer to play for them and clubs seem to prefer selling to them instead of abroad as well. Both Havertz and Brandt have been linked with Bayern.
Would Rodri really fix those issues? Is he really that kind of player? I’ve not seen a massive amount of Atletico and perhaps it can be difficult to see past how they look to play as a unit, but he seemed to be a gritty player who excelled defensively, who can also play a bit.
I've been underwhelmed whenever I had the chance of watching Rodri. Granted he's 22 and I might have caught him off his game. What is his buyout clause actually?
The idea of getting Rabiot for free is a good one that I share also. I think it would work with Herrera, Rabiot and Pogba.
I would rather we activate Rodri's buyout clause too. Would be such a jizz worthy signing that I can't quite explain in words.
To be fair, I was hoping we'd be trying to sign both last summer and given the choice between the two, I would have hoped we would have chosen Rodrigo. Otherwise I agree, I am just not sure, whether Rodrigo would want to leave after just one year there.
He's better on the ball than he often gets to show at Atletico, and his qualities defensively would be a huge plus point, he's like a more physical Busquets IMO, ideal at the base as it would allow us more flexibility in the other #8 role. Rodri's buyout clause is €70M. which I believe is around £55-60M.
He might not but he wouldn't be the first player to move after one season and I think we can offer him a tempting package, and with the buyout clause we can find out one way or another pretty quickly and move on if he's not interested. You'd have bought both Rodri and Ndombele?
LB: Alex Sandro
DM: Rodrigo
CM: NDombele
RB: Mukiele
De Gea/PereiraOut: Darmian, Shaw, Blind, Fellaini, Mata (unfortunately), Carrick
Ricardo Pereira/Valencia - Bailly/Jones/Lindelof - Rojo/Smalling - Alex Sandro/Young
Rodrigo/Matic
NDombele/Herrera - Pogba
Fekir/Lingard
Lukaku/Rashford - Alexis/Martial
They can have one we can take the other
Which one would you prefer? Havertz is more of a SS while Brandt is more of a winger from what I've heard (don't watch BuLi often)
Which one would you prefer? Havertz is more of a SS while Brandt is more of a winger from what I've heard (don't watch BuLi often)
They're quite good at adapting to their opponents. I've seen them control games with the opposition barely getting out of their half this season, and Rodrigo and Partey have both been key to that. Obviously that isn't their main gameplan, but they are capable of doing it.
Rodrigo, to me, reminds me of a mix of Carrick and Matic. He has that calmness Carrick brings to the team, and Matic's strength on the ball to resist the press.
It's called second season syndrome. Pogba, Ryan Sessegnon, Martial, Rashford, Leroy Sane etc It's a common thing for young footballers to go through especially after a World Cup in the summer.SMS forgot all about that mug. I remember people saying we should swap Pogba for him.
This still doesn't explain what happened at Villarreal last season. He was quite clearly the most influential player on a consistent basis in that team. I am also not sure what qualifies as playmaking for you. Everyone except Koke, that you named, has less influence on Atletico's overall play compared to Rodrigo and it's by a good margin. Are you talking about creativity? I could bore you with numbers, he's the only Atletico player, who has a pass completion rate that resembles that of a playmaker. Even if you want to say that doesn't matter and Atletico aren't set up this way, it's fairly easy to project Koke and Rodrigo in a possession based team and seeing both succeed.
Seriously? What the feck are we waiting for?! I thought it was something like 100m.
Controlling games and influencing them are two different things. Rodri doesn't control the rhythm of the game or its orientation, it's not a criticism, it's simply not the way he plays today or anyone else except sometimes Koke. And pass completion rate has nothing to do with playmaking, it's not because he has 90% completion that he is a playmaker or game controller. If for example you simply use pass completion rate and volume of passes Rodri and Casemiro are in the same range in both categories, Casemiro has more long passes and 0.1 less key passes per games. They are not exactly the same player but neither control the game.
The way Atletico control the game is by slowing it down without the ball, they defend deep, close the space and the opposition is forced to slow down. When games start getting crazy and fast, they tend to drown that's mainly because none of their midfielders are game managers, they are either destroyers or all-action players, no one has the tactical nous to actually control the game with the ball. When they themselves get the ball, the ball is quickly moved to playmakers which to answer your question are creative players.
Do you like Rodrigo Hernandez?
"He's a superb player, and he would be even better in a style like Barcelona's. He has both things, he is so good that he can play for Atletico, taking the ball, pressing and closing down spaces. He has the Barcelona profile, I see him as top class, like Busi [Sergio Busquets]. He lifts his heads up. Uff, he's great. I think Barcelona should have signed him."
I thought it was as well, maybe we will make that move now Ole is in charge. Interesting looking at your line-up there that you'd already felt the diamond was the way to go, you were ahead of the curve on that one mate.
That had mostly to do with us signing Sanchez and thinking that he's at his best closest to goal (and hoping he isn't past it), Rashford and Martial not necessarily being pure wingers, who would still be able to drift wide, if we lined up in that shape and not being as convinced by the options for the right wing compared to Fekir, I think. Edit: And thanks mate.
I can see where your logic was coming from, none of the forwards we have are really wide forwards (Martial being the closest) or wingers, and none are great as the lone #9 in a front 3, so the set up with 2 up top and a creative goal scorer in behind made sense, I think we were all hoping for a lot more from Sanchez. Is Fekir still your first choice for the role at the tip of the diamond, or just the most attainable?
Neves certainly has potential and is still young enough to improve further. But IMO should stay another season at Wolves to develop further..I want to see how both Moutinho and Neves do against City. I'm not saying you are wrong but I want to see them against better players than Pogba and younger ones than Matic. This would give a glimpse as to how they would fare in the CL (if we get there). My feeling is Neves is certainly good enough, I've seen less of Moutinho... but my feeling is he'll go to Spain
That's it. We are not buying him. The last player we got that was DM playing CB have not work out great, seeing that he's been chasing the ball head first ever since he came to OT.Declan Rice reminds me of a CB playing DM
Resembles Herrera, but maybe more technical and driven with the ball? At only 21, I think he's worth a shot, as longs as he doesn't totally bomb with Rodgers.Youri Tielemans is an exciting talent that may be available. He will develop well in Leicester city under Brendan Rodgers.
The latter, I think. IMO he'd still be a very good signing, but not as good as Dybala in that role for example, who might be available. Sancho has also emerged, who I'd prefer to both. What's your preference in terms of players? Where does Eriksen rank?
All the talks about creativity in midfield we still talk up the likes of Ndombele, Rodri et al.
I think a player like Ericksen or Verratti is a must buy for our midfield. With the later, we get an all action pack midfield player, but more attacking onus from the former. These are highly creative players capable of playing multiple positions and will share creative responsibility with Pogba.
Instead of adding more hard workers I suggest we add players that are comfortable with the ball at their feet more.
I'd we ship out Matic because I believe he's done here, get in Ericksen or Verratti at any cost, Rabiot on a free then we are done in midfield.
All the talks about creativity in midfield we still talk up the likes of Ndombele, Rodri et al.
I think a player like Ericksen or Verratti is a must buy for our midfield. With the later, we get an all action pack midfield player, but more attacking onus from the former. These are highly creative players capable of playing multiple positions and will share creative responsibility with Pogba.
Instead of adding more hard workers I suggest we add players that are comfortable with the ball at their feet more.
I'd we ship out Matic because I believe he's done here, get in Ericksen or Verratti at any cost, Rabiot on a free then we are done in midfield.
What type of CM do we need?
a) A deep-lying playmaker (Kroos, Pjanic)
b) A ball winner (Ndombele, Kante)
c) A creative midfielder (Eriksen, Fekir)
Eriksen would be my #1 choice for the role as he can also play in midfield and on the right, plus he's settled in and proven in the PL. My list of preference would be 1. Eriksen 2. Dybala 3. Isco 4. Joao Felix 5. Fekir.