He's constantly resisted playing a 3 man midfield that everyone knows is what Pogba needs, and instead has tried to force a square peg into a round hole and thus Pogba has faltered, it has zero to do with needing Pirlo.
No, you were portraying that Pogba has digressed because of Mourinho. I believe it's because he's signed for a team with less ability than the peak-Juventus side winning Leagues and Champions Leagues. Quite unfair to compare the two.
No, I am saying that it's typical that he'll have issues with a CM like Pogba and that the CM he "created" is a dog solider, he'd have 11 of them if he could.
If he would have 11 dog soldiers then why would he sign Pogba who you've gone on to explain, isn't a dog soldier and play him in a midfield three? Why didn't he spend that 90m on 3 of these dog soldiers that you keep banging on about?
You're insinuating that Mourinho is holding Pogba back, why is he? He gets to play in his coveted 3 man midfield, he gets license to bomb forward and influence attacking play, and he only produces 1 game in every 4. Consistent tactics, inconsistent player performance. Not the managers fault.
Yes, he was a kid from Brazil, there's a dozen new Neymar's every year coming out of there, and most of them fail when they get to top leagues, Pep has nurtured and coached this kid into being a top PL forward, that's not comparable to taking a 24 year old giant who has been in this league for 5 years and getting a few more goals out of him, and yes, lets not ignore what Guardiola has gotten out of Sane with patience and support in compared to what Mourinho has done to Martial.
He was scoring for fun in Brazil, quite easy to send some scouts to Brazil and find a 19 year old top scorer and think "lets take a punt on him"
And anyway, he's scored 12 goals all season, Wayne friggin Rooney has got 10 goals and he can barely jog. Hardly turned him into a world beater has he.
Martial is another, who walks around the pitch looking like he can't be bothered, produces 1-2 moments of brilliance every now and then and then vanishes in games. He was doing that before Mourinho arrived here. You should be grateful we have a manager who weeds out these types of personalities.
You don't need to feel bad, and I don't give a shit about how Inter or Porto fans felt, or a oil daddy club like Chelsea, all of whom were despereate for a sniff of some glory. I've seen United win 13 PL titles and 2 CL's, I can die happy on that, I don't need another one to enjoy my club, I enjoyed my club when we were well in Liverpool's shadow because I enjoyed watching us play.
I insist on feeling bad, honestly, because I'm a content fan right now. Not content with the style of play no, it could be much better. But content completely at the progress made, and you're bitterly dissapointed.
So did you celebrate when we got to the FA Cup final? Won the Europa Cup? Not my preference of trophies to be winning, but it's the start of his reign and he's the first United manager to ever win something in his first year. And would you celebrate if he took us to our 21st Premier League title??? Or would you, like you said "react the same way if we won drew or lost"? This is intriguing, it's actually like you don't currently support the club. I am actually baffled i'm speaking to a Man United fan who doesn't care if we win or lose because of our manager.
There are no positives because I don't value winning at all costs, that is the bottom line, Liverpool may well win a CL in a couple of weeks with a lot less investment than us, a poorer squad and having had to sell their second best player halfway through the season, and they have done it while playing brilliant football, this notion that we have to accept having shit shoveled down our throat by Mourinho because he might get you a PL trophy is just a complete falsehood, we don't have to compromise the club to his whims to get back to the top.
Ask Arsenal fans if they value winning at all costs after the last 10 years they've had to endure under Wenger and his refusal to win at all costs. They would have loved to have Mourinho at Arsenal this past few years.
So on Liverpool being in a CL final and it being Mourinho's fault apparently - So did you want Fergie out when Arsenal got to a CL final? When Liverpool got to 2 CL finals, with far less investment and poorer squads, selling their best players? Na didn't think so.
And Liverpool have won nothing under Klopp, they may very well lose to the favourites. He doesn't have the ability to win cup finals, he bottles it because his very 1 dimensional naive attacking football gets them into trouble in the end. They've also been extremely lucky that Salah went full beast-mode on him following the sale of Coutinho. Without Salah they'd probably be about 5th in the PL and no CL final.
They can't keep up with us in the league and will likely finish 4th. They also couldn't beat us recently despite being in the form of their lives, and Salah was in Ashley Young's pocket for 90 minutes. A player completely re-born under Mourinho - again, I expect you won't credit him for that.