Fellaini is the squad player along with herrera, we need a 3rd player who can start (hence why we might sign Fred). Pogba, matic and 1 more starters, herrera and fellaini as squad players is fine tbh.What really confuses me about this, is that not long ago he said that midfield is an area where we need to improve and extending Fellaini isn't going to achieve that.
Fellaini is the squad player along with herrera, we need a 3rd player who can start (hence why we might sign Fred). Pogba, matic and 1 more starters, herrera and fellaini as squad players is fine tbh.
What really confuses me about this, is that not long ago he said that midfield is an area where we need to improve and extending Fellaini isn't going to achieve that.
So by your theory we're just going to let Carrick retire and not replace him?
What really confuses me about this, is that not long ago he said that midfield is an area where we need to improve and extending Fellaini isn't going to achieve that.
I just don't get it. What do the rest of the top teams do when they need a plan B and don't have a Fellaini?So, new contract for Fellaini and signing Fred, sounds about as underwhelming as it gets..
In before the #fredthered unveiling
I just don't get it. What do the rest of the top teams do when they need a plan B and don't have a Fellaini?
Yeah but my point is this,
All you see on these pages are people clamouring for us to sign the ‘next big thing’ - Carlos Kickaballos from Gremio, Slobbadon Mihalahalahalavic from Red Star, Anthony Le van Der von De Belgian from Anderlecht. How many of the players you see splashed all over the transfer rumours pages at 19/20 ever go on to get anywhere near the level of a player like Matic?
You sign a player like Matic at 28 for £40m. You get into 5 seasons of quantified PL winning, European CL calibre football. You sign these “wonderkids” and it’s a season for them to settle, followed by second season syndrome, followed by the inevitable gnashing of teeth when they get left out after failing to hit the heights consistently.
When we have 16/17 CL/World Level players in our squad in their prime, THEN I might be interested in taking a couple of punts, but right now we don’t have that luxury
Just for arguments sake, look at the line-ups of the four teams in the CL semi’s. How many U23s? I bet it’s not many and I bet they don’t play CB/CM or CF
Yeah but my point is this,
All you see on these pages are people clamouring for us to sign the ‘next big thing’ - Carlos Kickaballos from Gremio, Slobbadon Mihalahalahalavic from Red Star, Anthony Le van Der von De Belgian from Anderlecht. How many of the players you see splashed all over the transfer rumours pages at 19/20 ever go on to get anywhere near the level of a player like Matic?
You sign a player like Matic at 28 for £40m. You get into 5 seasons of quantified PL winning, European CL calibre football. You sign these “wonderkids” and it’s a season for them to settle, followed by second season syndrome, followed by the inevitable gnashing of teeth when they get left out after failing to hit the heights consistently.
When we have 16/17 CL/World Level players in our squad in their prime, THEN I might be interested in taking a couple of punts, but right now we don’t have that luxury
Just for arguments sake, look at the line-ups of the four teams in the CL semi’s. How many U23s? I bet it’s not many and I bet they don’t play CB/CM or CF
The "old" Pirlo had more to his game than long diagonal passes out to the wings. Yes it's just a highlights video, and Neves isn't a bad player, but I'd need to watch him more often to see what his passing range is really like.
Show me where I mention Carrick.
You implied that extending Fellaini ends any hope of the midfield being improved.
Yet replacing a midfielder who can barely contribute anymore (Carrick) with a new signing will blatantly improve our midfield choices.
I didn't come to the conclusion that not extending Fellaini would mean that we won't replace Carrick, you did. I am very much in favour of signing a replacement for Carrick, a player who should be replaced, unlike Fellaini, a player we can afford to let go.
You came to the conclusion that extending Fellaini would mean that we don't improve our midfield. It's possible to improve the midfield whilst keeping Fellaini as a squad player, by signing a replacement for Carrick.
Fellaini is 1 of about 10-12 squad players that are not good enough to be first team players for United, but we simply cannot turn over and replace 10 players a summer. It's got to be gradual and Fellaini is an experienced PL player that can do a job from time to time.
What really confuses me about this, is that not long ago he said that midfield is an area where we need to improve and extending Fellaini isn't going to achieve that.
Again, that's not what I said. I don't agree that extending Fellaini is going to help our midfield.
Again, that's not what I said. I don't agree that extending Fellaini is going to help our midfield, replacing him with someone better is going to help IMO. Darmian, Blind, Shaw and Fellaini are the only ones I want us to let go. 4 out and 4 in would be a good summer IMO. Specifically a LB, RB and 2 CMs.
Its not supposed to, replacing Carrick with someone who can actually play a few games will.
Extending Fellainis contract doesn't weaken us compared to this season.
Its not rocket science.
I don't get it either, Mourinho has Beer goggles on when it comes to Fellaini. I thought this summer we'd buy a top CM and add another quality younger CM option to the squad to understudy Matic, but there wont be the squad space now.
So with:
1 - Pogba
2 - *New world class CM signing*
3 - Matic
4 - Hererra
5- McTomminay
.... to occupy 2/3 positions, what would the point be with swapping and experienced reliable Premier League player in Fellaini as the 6th member of midfield with an inexperienced one?
The player in this slot will get 20 games a season and usually an option when we need an urgent goal - would a young inexperienced CM be able to provide that with 10 mins to go? Because Fellaini will.
This is what Mourinho has spent 2 years trying to move away from, inexperienced unreliable players. As a result we're playing more consistently and progressing up the table.
How about the player Mourinho just named his Managers Player of the Season? Or don't you support the promotion of our academy players?The point is to add a young understudy to a pretty slow and immobile DM who will be 30 at the start of next season, so we can rotate and prepare beyond the current,
rather than resorting to garbage football with a huge lump in depseration constantly,
How about the player Mourinho just named his Managers Player of the Season? Or don't you support the promotion of our academy players?
Slighty exaggeration there. We play bland football, but we still score plenty of goals, and concede very few. It's a very astute way of creating a winning machine, and we're firmly the 2nd best PL side right now. Such a huge jump compared to the broken team he took over.
How about the player Mourinho just named his Managers Player of the Season? Or don't you support the promotion of our academy players?
Slighty exaggeration there. We play bland football, but we still score plenty of goals, and concede very few. It's a very astute way of creating a winning machine, and we're firmly the 2nd best PL side right now. Such a huge jump compared to the broken team he took over.
Our midfield needs a lot of work to compete with Europe's elite. Watching Real - Bayern and the level of the midfields on display and then watching us is very depressing. The speed of play, the movement, the technical quality. We are light years away from competing with them. Only midfielder we have that can reach that level and compete with these teams is Pogba. Everyone else can and should be upgraded. We need more control in our midfield. Our success solely depends on the quality of the players we have. We don't have a manager like Klopp who can coach average players like Milner/ Henderson to a probable CL final so the best route is to buy the best players whilst we have Mourinho in charge.
Looking at the numbers we have and knowing what the manager thinks of certain players, I’m starting to question whether we’re going to sign a midfielder.
1. Pogba (going nowhere)
2. Matic (manager favourite)
3. Herrera (not a starter but comes in to do a job)
4. Fellaini (manager begged to stay and likely will)
5. McTominay (manager went out of his way to give an award to. He clearly rates him)
I didn't come to the conclusion that not extending Fellaini would mean that we won't replace Carrick, you did. I am very much in favour of signing a replacement for Carrick, a player who should be replaced, unlike Fellaini, a player we can afford to let go.
I'm guessing there was some awards thing tonight and he named McTominay his player of the year? I've never heard of that category before and If people can't see that for the bullshit pandering it is, well....McTominay doesn't look anything special.
It's not an exagerration to say we are garbage to watch most of the time, even moreso when Fellaini is in the team. We have ground our way to 2nd but at a great cost IMO, we don't even resemble a Manchester United team at this point.
I support it when they're ready and we have a space for them. McTominay is not right now. At the moment all he does is keep the ball with safe sideways passes and we have Matic starting who already does that for us. Cleverley wasnt good enough either and he did the same thing but got on the ball more. The only real difference and probably why he's a Mourinho project, is he's tall. Hopefully he's being groomed to learn from and take over from Matic in a few years, not play next to him week after week
Funny that, because you are disregarding McTomminay at the age of 21, 1 year into his Manchester United senior career, yet you're harping away on here that we don't resemble Manchester United, a side who are famous for promoting youth. We're also in our 3rd cup final in barely 2 seasons, as side famous for being in cup finals.
I thought Manchester United promoted youth, scored late goals and won trophies? Sure the football isn't as attacking as many would like, but Mourinho is getting the results and winning trophies. We haven't won the Premier League yet, but if you can't see the re-building and progress he has made in the Premier League then you need to take a much closer look. We're going to break the 80 points barrier, are you ignorant to that? The way you described us in your last post you make us sound like a 15th place Pulis side. We're firmly in 2nd place, have recently beaten every side around us and are in yet another cup final. Yet you're throwing your toys out of the pram because we haven't scored 100 goals and got 95 points.
United fans that 'expect' us to play scintillating football, winning the Premier League every year 'because we're Manchester United' and 'because we once had Fergie' are simply spoilt. Born in 1987, all I've ever seen is United dominate, but I'm also a realist and know that we have no divine right to win anything. You're comparing Mourinho's United to Fergies finest and you should be comparing it to the one he took over, LVG's which had Rooney as a central midfielder, Depay on the wing, Schneiderlin and Schweinsteiger as our central midfielders, Darmian and Rojo as our wingbacks and ask yourself why we are 'only 2nd' in the Premier League. See the progress.
Funny that, because you are disregarding McTomminay at the age of 21, 1 year into his Manchester United senior career, yet you're harping away on here that we don't resemble Manchester United, a side who are famous for promoting youth. We're also in our 3rd cup final in barely 2 seasons, as side famous for being in cup finals.
I thought Manchester United promoted youth, scored late goals and won trophies? Sure the football isn't as attacking as many would like, but Mourinho is getting the results and winning trophies. We haven't won the Premier League yet, but if you can't see the re-building and progress he has made in the Premier League then you need to take a much closer look. We're going to break the 80 points barrier, are you ignorant to that? The way you described us in your last post you make us sound like a 15th place Pulis side. We're firmly in 2nd place, have recently beaten every side around us and are in yet another cup final. Yet you're throwing your toys out of the pram because we haven't scored 100 goals and got 95 points.
United fans that 'expect' us to play scintillating football, winning the Premier League every year 'because we're Manchester United' and 'because we once had Fergie' are simply spoilt. Born in 1987, all I've ever seen is United dominate, but I'm also a realist and know that we have no divine right to win anything. You're comparing Mourinho's United to Fergies finest and you should be comparing it to the one he took over, LVG's which had Rooney as a central midfielder, Depay on the wing, Schneiderlin and Schweinsteiger as our central midfielders, Darmian and Rojo as our wingbacks and ask yourself why we are 'only 2nd' in the Premier League. See the progress.
If Chelsea don’t get Champions League football next season then would a move for Kante be a good idea ?.