Wonder Pigeon
'Shelbourne FC Supporter'
It is feeling the same now as when Dortmund top the table for a week and Bayern decide actually they've changed their mind and are going to win the next fifteen games in a row.
You're clearly in denial if you think he isn't. They will win titles without him, but not as much as they're doing with him and certainly not in such a dominating form.City will continue winning long after Pep leaves if they are allowed to keep on cheating. Pep has changed their culture but he isnt the difference between the other teams.
Arsenal bottling it is a big story because they were 8 points clear at one point. It’s nothing like Liverpool getting 97 points and still not winning it.
Having played a game more. Granted it was in their hands but we all knew Arsenal's form would dip at some point.City will continue winning long after Pep leaves if they are allowed to keep on cheating. Pep has changed their culture but he isnt the difference between the other teams.
Arsenal bottling it is a big story because they were 8 points clear at one point. It’s nothing like Liverpool getting 97 points and still not winning it.
Please do some research on club’s spending in the 90’s before posting shite.The PL is of course money driven. The challenge is who a) has the most b) spends it best. If you look at spending in the 1990’s, Manchester United were dominating as they were the richest and most famous club in the world. It allowed them to get the best players, pay amongst the highest wages and reputationally were untouchable.
Times have changed, but the issues themselves have not. Everyone has more money now because of TV and the globalisation of the PL, but there is still an enormous gulf in income/expenditure between say, Manchester City and Fulham. Or Manchester United and Brentford. Or Newcastle and Leicester.
The haves and have-nots is nothing new, it’s just the figures are higher and the entities have changed.
When Manchester United get their takeover, it will all look different again, Manchester United will become title contenders again, and the PL won’t be “shit” any more from fans of your club’s perspective.
In this time we won 4 leagues, 2 FA Cups.1992-1998 net spend
Newcastle: £40,570,000 (> 4000% more than United)
Arsenal: £31,070,000 (> 3100% more than United)
Liverpool: £29,625,000 (> 2900% more than United spent)
Chelsea: £27,705,000 (> 2700% more than United spent)
Spurs: £18,630,000 (> 1800% more than United spent)
City: £12,070,000 (> 1200% more than United spent)
United: -£40,000
Please do some research on club’s spending in the 90’s before posting shite.
This isn’t to say we didn’t spend.
In this time we won 4 leagues, 2 FA Cups.
Our spending did increase after 1998, but this was due to our success and coinciding with the globalisation of the premier league and Sky.
Sure - but take it over a 7-8 year period like the above. How much is it?The problem with net spend is it doesn’t show the full picture.City’s net spend this season was the lowest in the league and one of the lowest over the last few years. This was made by them dropping 1Billion then able to sell them players down the line to fund other top players
City - defending champions out in the quarter finalsThe real farmers league.
The league is very poor this year.City - defending champions out in the quarter finals
Arsenal - out in the quarter finals with a whimper
Newcastle - finished bottom of their group
Man United - finished bottom of their group
Brighton - absolutely destroyed in R16 of the Europa League
Liverpool- currently 3-0 down in the EL quarter finals
West Ham - currently 2-0 down in the EL quarter finals
Safe to say it has not been a vintage year for 'The best league in the world' TM
Best in entertainment not qualityBut Sky Sports are always telling me it’s the best league in the world and never been better!
Love it.I like it. I really like it. Overpaid players can now watch games from their chairs at home.
Between City, VAR, poor refereeing, incredibly poor and bias media coverage, it has become a bit of a bore.It used to be the best. I used to watch any match , whoever was playing, and loved it but the last few years it's become more and more boring.
Skill is disappearing and just waiting for someone to make a mistake.
VAR is killing the game as well which isn't helping.
Between City, VAR, poor refereeing, incredibly poor and bias media coverage, it has become a bit of a bore.
Canal + is terrible too thoughAt least I'm spared the Sounesses of this world with Canal+
Canal + is terrible too though
I still maintain despite all the money pumped in, it's never approached the relative dominance it had during 2007-2008.
Every single English team knocked out by another in the UCL. You can easily argue the 4 best teams in the world were the big 4 from the Premier League. A rebuttal that the traditional giants in Europe weren't at their best also holds true now.
Football was more fun then too. I loved counter attacking ping pong football games that were end to end rather than the methodical robot football that has slowly entered and taken over. It's why neutrals love teams like Luton coming up, they're a bit of a throwback to those days.
Agreed. The methodical style of play that nearly every team is trying to play is boring AF. Give me free flowing attacking football, smashing crosses with bullet headers, and rockets from miles out galore. Those were the days
Definitely. It was quite refreshing hearing Schweinsteiger in his interview with the Overlap speaking fairly similarly and how Pep and his style has seeped into clubs in the respective leagues he's managed and has had a detrimental impact in terms of watchability.
The phrase "shit on a stick football" was coined in response to a Chelsea-Liverpool game from back thenFootball was more fun then too. I loved counter attacking ping pong football games that were end to end rather than the methodical robot football that has slowly entered and taken over. It's why neutrals love teams like Luton coming up, they're a bit of a throwback to those days.