peterstorey
Still not banned
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2002
- Messages
- 37,291
That's exactly what I was talking about before, a masturbatory set-piece nothing to do with supporting the team on the pitch.
That's exactly what I was talking about before, a masturbatory set-piece nothing to do with supporting the team on the pitch.
Well 3,000 of us made more noise than Celtic when the game actually started after their fanshow shite.
They had to ruin it with the gay poznan
Celtic were doing it before City
That kid Matthews looked really good for Celtic tonight. Healey and Lafferty are dirty bastards.
First time I've watched Scottish football in years, I actually enjoyed that match, was very exciting for many different reasons. Might watch a few more if I get the chance.
You know it hasn't been a great game when Samaras is one of the best performers.
If you say so ..... pile of shit in front of plastic fans.
Celtic were doing it before City
It was a lot more entertaining contest than watching Man Utd put 5 past 10 men.
Celtic were doing it before City
Also don't see why so many people feel the need to mention the standard of Scottish football being comparatively poor every time there is a thread on the subject. So are the Irish and Welsh leagues but most don't bother pointing it out every time a game is televised.
Thats because Irish and Welsh leagues have accepted that they are shit and that their top 2 teams shouldn't be anywhere near being touted as walk-ins to the English Premier League
Celtic and Rangers have yet to embrace the fact that they are shit, their league is shit and their players are mid-table players at best
Yes but given our money and 4/5 seasons in the premier league they'd be challenging for titles. They're two of the biggest clubs in the world.
my arse
With regards to what? Whether they're big clubs? Whether they'd compete given the money?
I don't understand why you're underestimating these clubs history or potential.
When thinking of the worlds biggest clubs i'd say these spring to mind right away:
Barcelona
Real Madrid
Man United
Liverpool
Arsenal
Celtic
Rangers
Bayern Munich
Inter Milan
AC Milan
Given the opportunity and the money they'd be amongst the biggest clubs in the premier league, easily. There's absolutely no question about it.
The best they could hope for is Europa League places (winning Carling/FA Cup)
The top 6 are light years ahead of them and would continue to be if Celtic & Rangers were in the PL.
Why would it? They're huge clubs with great history and support. There's nothing stopping them attracting players. I fail to see how they wouldn't compete given time.
They would be no bigger than Newcastle or Aston Villa
Both Clubs would need to invest about £250m just to challenge the top 6
They would be no bigger than Newcastle or Aston Villa
With regards to what? Whether they're big clubs? Whether they'd compete given the money?
I don't understand why you're underestimating these clubs history or potential.
When thinking of the worlds biggest clubs i'd say these spring to mind right away:
Barcelona
Real Madrid
Man United
Liverpool
Arsenal
Celtic
Rangers
Bayern Munich
Inter Milan
AC Milan
Given the opportunity and the money they'd be amongst the biggest clubs in the premier league, easily. There's absolutely no question about it.
Rangers brought 200,000 fans to Manchester in 2008.
Celtic took 85,000 overseas to Seville in 2003.
Yes but given the money they clearly would be challenging for titles. As was my inital point.
I genuinely wouldnt rate them in that company now.
Thats just like including Forest because they won the European Cup
Celtic and Rangers have; a better stadium, a bigger world wide fan base, a bigger stadium, more local fans, and more passionate fans. The only thing you could argue is that between the Scottish Clubs there are less people in the 90 minute radius, but that rule has gone now anyway.