ivaldo
Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 28,725
That would make one sexy kit.
That would make one sexy kit.
Hate to say it but it's quite lovely. They've had nice kits for a few years now.
Targaryen? feck that. Stannis the Mannis the rightful king.
Targaryen? feck that. Stannis the Mannis the rightful king.
Under Armour, pure shit.Who the hell is that shirt manufacturer on the Tottenham kits? Not only have I not seen that logo before, it's the worst set of kits I've seen in a long while.
AIA sponsored Spurs' shirts in Europa League last season IIRC.Wait, so HP only sponsored Spurs kit for one season?
Hate to say it but it's quite lovely. They've had nice kits for a few years now.
It ain't bad, but what that picture isn't showing are the shorts; they got rid of the white shorts, and replaced them with sky blue to match the shirt. Not sure if the all blue looks as good.
Whats the FIFA rule? I remember hearing the thing about Spain but Brazil still wore their usual yellow shirt, blue shorts and white socks.Fed up of teams doing this, one colour is boring. Need a contrast on the shorts and/or socks.
Plus the FIFA rule for national teams being similar so all the traditional colourways have gone. Spain wearing all red wasn't just unsuccessful but it looked crap too.
Whats the FIFA rule? I remember hearing the thing about Spain but Brazil still wore their usual yellow shirt, blue shorts and white socks.
Tottenham away leak/rumour:
Tottenham home leak/rumour:
Something about only being allowed to have two colours per kit.
Brazil wore white shorts more often than they wore blue and it made no sense.
Similarly Brazil vs. Holland in the final, why did Brazil wear white shorts and socks and Holland have to wear the away kit when in the 1998 semi they both wore the normal home kits and it looked so much better.
The designs for the new Arsenal kits are nice but the skin tight shirts kill them for me. It looks so bad in my opinion.
Not so good for the lardboys in the crowd.I like the skin tight shirts. It makes the players look stronger/more athletic. Plus more eye candy for the female population is only good for the popularity of the sport. However I agree that Arsenal's shirts don't look that good, probably because the contrasting colour of the sleeves.
I just think they look dumb. Especially when some clubs have the skin tight shirts yet the shorts are baggy and huge.I like the skin tight shirts. It makes the players look stronger/more athletic. Plus more eye candy for the female population is only good for the popularity of the sport. However I agree that Arsenal's shirts don't look that good, probably because the contrasting colour of the sleeves.
I like the skin tight shirts. It makes the players look stronger/more athletic. Plus more eye candy for the female population is only good for the popularity of the sport.
Compare these almost identical pictures of Cavani. I know which shirt makes him look strong and athletic.No, it makes them look ridiculous.
It's a pretty big brand in Denmark. They don't have a lot of teams they do kits for though.Hummel are still around? They were only known for the Denmark kits.
What's up with the weird badge?
It's a pretty big brand in Denmark. They don't have a lot of teams they do kits for though.