MJJ
New Member
Don't understand how Kroos-Cambiasso is even with Moutinho-Carrick.
Cambiasso is better than Carrick, while moutinho edges out kroos. Individually not a lot in it, although as a partnership I probably prefer Skizzo's duo.
Don't understand how Kroos-Cambiasso is even with Moutinho-Carrick.
Mine would be 6-5 to @crappycraperson but if he wants my vote he needs to convince me that Martin Caceres isn't a liability. The only thing about him I can recall it's that he often gets sent off.
Don't understand how Kroos-Cambiasso is even with Moutinho-Carrick.
Because most rate carrick higher than you do.Don't understand how Kroos-Cambiasso is even with Moutinho-Carrick.
I think even cambiasso also only edges out carrick. It is a classic case of underrating your own. Both have similar CVS in terms of cl wins. Carrick main criticism is that he could not mix it up with likes of xavi and inesta. Cambiasso did better against barca with inter due to Jose set up. Swap in carrick for Motta in that team and carrick would also have been part of a team that won against that midfieldCambiasso is better than Carrick, while moutinho edges out kroos. Individually not a lot in it, although as a partnership I probably prefer Skizzo's duo.
Picking Gerrard/Lampard/Terry/Drogba (any Chelsea/Pool legends really) means you lose the draft crappy.So Gerrard is a factor
I hate 'pool as much as anyone , heck I even hate Owen even when he was with us! But peak Gerrard > peak Silva for me. I am fine if others disagree but peak gerrard in right set up is better.
I got nothingIt's a decent start, and could lead to vote buying. What's your offer @crappycraperson ?
I think even cambiasso also only edges out carrick. It is a classic case of underrating your own. Both have similar CVS in terms of cl wins. Carrick main criticism is that he could not mix it up with likes of xavi and inesta. Cambiasso did better against barca with inter due to Jose set up. Swap in carrick for Motta in that team and carrick would also have been part of a team that won against that midfield
That's my fault - I've edited the title which may help.Plus it's harsh on Skizzo that he was leading by seven votes only for the votes to be resetted.
No arguments here, while I think Cambiasso is better there isn't a lot in it. I would probably prefer Carrick at his best due to his passing range and creativity. i did forget Gerrard influence, I actually think with him you will win the midfield battle. .
Underrating Cambiasso's passing there. over the last 200 or so games...Carrick has 12 assists, and averages .7 key passes a game.
Cambiasso 11 assists, and 1.1 key passes a game.
Cambiasso seems to be type cast as some brute who just runs around. He isn't a bad passer by any stretch.
Mine would be 6-5 to @crappycraperson but if he wants my vote he needs to convince me that Martin Caceres isn't a liability. The only thing about him I can recall it's that he often gets sent off.
I don t believe he is a liability. @antohan who watches him for Uruguay commented that he is a handy defensive option. He was a part of Uruguay team that won the cops. Plus he is playing next to 2 excellent defenders in vidic and varane. He is also not being asked to do a tough job. He will mostly be playing as a defensive full back.
Carrick's assist stats don't give the full picture since often he kicks off the attack from the deep playing the pass to someone out wide. Cambiasso can contribute to attacks but he is more likely to do that by his forward runs rather than playing deep lying playmaker role ala Carrick. Problem here is that if you want to afford your Athletico defense the same protection as their club then you need Cambiasso in a pure holding role, especially since his midfield partner is Kroos.
Crappy has a pretty much perfect setup for peak Gerrard and Aguero. That attack outscores skizzo's, IMO. Skizzo's defensive 4 is better but crappy's defense is better protected and has the better keeper behind it. The midfield is even, simply because I don't think Silva will be that effective without Kroos also playing higher up/Muller playing closer and centrally.
I just think crappy would win by a goal's margin.
Agreed about Cambiasso, and I should have clarified, as a duo Moutinho and Carrick offer better protection IMO.Cambiasso offers more protection than anyone in his midfield.
Muller drifts in throughout the game, and will always be available for passes. As will sterling and Lewandowski. Silva has plenty of options to link up and five an available player.
Fair enough though, thanks for the input
Sorry, real life got in the way - had to delete and start again because once votes are cast you can't change the public setting.
How's that now?
Agreed about Cambiasso, and I should have clarified, as a duo Moutinho and Carrick offer better protection IMO.
I'm not sure Muller would actually drift in much, with Ribery and Coentrao on that wing. I really wish you had either a genuine winger on the right and/or someone more box to box in midfield. Then, Silva would really thrive like he does at city. Here, he isn't completely ineffective, just not peaking, is my concern.
I give the Atletico trio a lot of credit, but I'm not sure they'll be enough to stop the superb Gerrard-Ribery-Aguero trio without a better DM to support them.
I really don't like Cacares vs Sterling for crappy though.
Though call, goals will be scored at both ends imo
Seldom has a player had to play on his wrong side in draft games as poor old Cambiasso. Reckon Sterling's getting over-rated in the context of this pool, for all his flourishing talents he's clearly the weakest winger / attacking midfielder on the pitch.
Ribery-Coentrao wouldn't let him, IMO. Sure you've got Cambiasso on that side as well, but that kind of overloading on that side is exactly what Gerrard will look to exploit I feel. How about switching Sterling and Muller, getting Sterling to run at Vidic?Muller drifts in an out throughout games. Why do you think he suddenly wouldn't?
He also has the worst full back up against him. I'd back him to have the right skill set to flourish against someone known for rash tackles and errors though.
Ribery-Coentrao wouldn't let him, IMO. Sure you've got Cambiasso on that side as well, but that kind of overloading on that side is exactly what Gerrard will look to exploit I feel. How about switching Sterling and Muller, getting Sterling to run at Vidic?
That would actually be a great call. Müller is precisely the sort of player that Cáceres would struggle with and Sterling attacking the space between Coentrao and Vidic is exactly what you need to get Lewandowski out of Vidic's pocket.
Yes, Sterling hype is high right now so no surprise I guess.Seldom has a player had to play on his wrong side in draft games as poor old Cambiasso. Reckon Sterling's getting over-rated in the context of this pool, for all his flourishing talents he's clearly the weakest winger / attacking midfielder on the pitch.
antohan has pretty much covered why Carcares wont be a liability. Besides I think you are giving Sterling too much credit if you think he will be the one deciding this match up.I give the Atletico trio a lot of credit, but I'm not sure they'll be enough to stop the superb Gerrard-Ribery-Aguero trio without a better DM to support them.
I really don't like Cacares vs Sterling for crappy though.
Though call, goals will be scored at both ends imo
antohan has pretty much covered why Carcares wont be a liability. Besides I think you are giving Sterling too much credit if you think he will be the one deciding this match up.
Joaquin is also getting grossly overlooked here. He is the exactly the type of winger who can skin Evra out wide and make him think twice about those forward runs.
Didn't say he would decide the game. .. just that he would have a lot of luck against that style of defender.
The fact you followed up that content by saying Joaquin is now skinning Evra all game. ..is bs quite frankly.
You have the two weakest fullbacks....arguably by a good distance. If anyone needs to think twice about attacking, it's Coentrao. He leaves and Muller has even more space to ruin riot.
I do not get where this absurd overrating of Juanfran is coming from. Coentrao has proven himself in the Portuguese set up many a times. He is not a defensive liability in any sense. Even if he is caught upfield, Vidic-Varane are good enough to take care of Muller-Lewandoski duo.
And yes.. if Lennon can skin Evra then prime Joaquin most definitely can as well.
Müller is not on the peak with 25 now. And maybe we should tell that he completed the 25 CL goals last weeks - half a year prior to the time a CR7 did... And he scored a lot of them in final stages and/or against teams out of the top nations...
Agreed. Muller alone almost made a deciding factor for voting for you. I'm surprised with how underrated he is.Agree. Of all the talk of players being underrated...I think Muller is getting the worst deal here. He's a handful for any full back, and can find space against some of the best defences...and here he is up against a full back who has been given pretty much a free reign to attack. He'd do all kinds of damage with that amount of freedom. Especially with Lewandowski occupying most of Vidic's attention.