Reiver
Full Member
I watch the six Star Wars movies at least once per year.
Also: the Royal Tenenbaums, The Terminator and Shawshank.
Also: the Royal Tenenbaums, The Terminator and Shawshank.
Wait, what? How can you have watched the first one but not the last one?
That's like watching half a movie?
I wish I could go back and watch them for the first time again in the cinema.
That game flopped because it was a pile of shite, not because of the Gollum character, who is fascinatingDid the recent gollum video game which flopped hard not teach them that nobody cares about that gammy little feck?
They did. Rated 6/10 on steam and costs $50. Saw some gameplay videos back then. Feck that, it was awful. They didn't learn. How interesting can a game be when the character is not interesting (on top of the game being dogshit quality).Did the recent gollum video game which flopped hard not teach them that nobody cares about that gammy little feck?
The film won't be about Gollum. I bet he'll have less than 10 minutes screen time.Did the recent gollum video game which flopped hard not teach them that nobody cares about that gammy little feck?
Speaking of 6 Star Wars movies, those last 3 crap ones have really given me an appreciation of the prequels.I watch the six Star Wars movies at least once per year.
Also: the Royal Tenenbaums, The Terminator and Shawshank.
Well they are searching for himThe film won't be about Gollum. I bet he'll have less than 10 minutes screen time.
I'm sure they're shitter technically, but the new ones (bar maybe the first one a little bit, as copy pasting episode 4 is hard to feck up) just dont resonate with me at all. I dont even remember most of the characters names.No, no, no. The prequels are by some distance shitter than the sequels, which were just a mess.
this is a false statementNo, no, no. The prequels are by some distance shitter than the sequels, which were just a mess.
I bet it'll be about people hunting for the ring way before the events of The Hobbit.Well they are searching for him
Will it be set after Hobbit when he loses the ring, to when they catch him and torture him taking us to the "BAGGGGGGIINNNNS, SHIIIIIRE" bit at the start of Fellowship?
The prequels do not have charm.The prequels have a charm the last three simply don't have. I don't love star wars but I have seen them all and the most recent ones are arguably better films but have absolutely no magic, they are worse star wars films if that makes any sense at all.
My kids are into star wars now and they love the prequels, watch them all the time, they watched the sequels once and don't talk about them or watch them ever.
Anyway, who the feck wants a film about follum. Wish they would leave lotr alone if they can't do anything decent with the franchise. That Amazon show was very shit.
The prequels do not have charm.
They were made in a warehouse because GL couldn't get off his fecking backside.
Ask the actors and crew members their experiences on set of the prequels. Nothing charming and wonderous about the production of those films.
Also, GL ruined Jake Lloyd's life, so screw him.
But he only turned from Smaegol to Gollum after he found the ring and murdered his mate, so it wouldn't make sense that way.I bet it'll be about people hunting for the ring way before the events of The Hobbit.
I'd assume it'll be about Aragorn and Gandalf, etc trying to track down Gollum in the time period between Bilbo leaving the Shire and Frodo leaving which is (if I remember correctly) 17 years. There's an appendix on this, which they have the rights to, and there was a fan film years ago on this exact subject with a similar, or perhaps, identical title.I bet it'll be about people hunting for the ring way before the events of The Hobbit.
The target audience wants to watch plodding, incoherent boring lazy ass space politics with some unlikable characters and cheap looking special effects? Sure.
Anyone that thinks the prequel trilogy in retrospect has been made better by the sequel trilogy is mad. They're both absolute shite bollocks.
Just stick with the first 2 I say.
In the book it's 17 years, in the film it's a few months.I'd assume it'll be about Aragorn and Gandalf, etc trying to track down Gollum in the time period between Bilbo leaving the Shire and Frodo leaving which is (if I remember correctly) 17 years. There's an appendix on this, which they have the rights to, and there was a fan film years ago on this exact subject with a similar, or perhaps, identical title.
It'll probably be shit.
I'm mad, let's go!The target audience wants to watch plodding, incoherent boring lazy ass space politics with some unlikable characters and cheap looking special effects? Sure.
Anyone that thinks the prequel trilogy in retrospect has been made better by the sequel trilogy is mad. They're both absolute shite bollocks.
Just stick with the first 2 I say.
Oh, yeah. That's inevitable.In the book it's 17 years, in the film it's a few months.
Feels like they're getting people used to recasting so they can reboot the trilogy.
It'll probably be shit.
There's 100s of years of time between him murdering his mate and the events of The Hobbit. Plenty of scope to tell a new story about some new characters trying (and failing) to find the ring.But he only turned from Smaegol to Gollum after he found the ring and murdered his mate, so it wouldn't make sense that way.
The target audience wants to watch plodding, incoherent boring lazy ass space politics with some unlikable characters and cheap looking special effects? Sure.
Anyone that thinks the prequel trilogy in retrospect has been made better by the sequel trilogy is mad. They're both absolute shite bollocks.
Just stick with the first 2 I say.
That's all Silmarillion, rights won't be sold for a while.Actually, quite a few stories from Tolkien have seen zero interest in being made as films, which really surprise me:
1) Beren and Luthien would be a perfect movie length and has an arctypical fairytale type
2) Turin Turambar would also make excellent films
3) Tale of Earendil the Mariner
4) Fall of Gondolin