The Impossible Draft R1 - idmanager vs Tuppet

With players at career peaks, who will win this match?


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .

Edgar Allan Pillow

Ero-Sennin
Joined
Dec 7, 2010
Messages
42,036
Location
┴┬┴┤( ͡° ͜ʖ├┬┴┬
lvg.png
VS
Impossible1-formation-tactics.png


....................................... TEAM IDMANAGER ............................................ ....................................... TEAM TUPPET .......................................



TEAM IDMANAGER:

Defense and Midfield:

The defense and midfield were built based on the profiles of the players in the opponent's attack.

Finney constantly liked to cut in from the right. Blokhin was a wing forward who liked to come from the left wing and score. He was far from being an orthodox winger. Ronaldinho I think will be expected to impact the game centrally.

An attack like this IMO would find it tough to break a well organized narrow defense setup. And that is what I am going to use.

In defense I have Tresor in the centre with Forster on the right and Zebec on the left. All three of them were considered great CBs of their times.

In the midfield I have Davids on the left, Smistik in the centre as the anchor man and Andrade on the right.

The idea is to always have at least 2 players to cover for the opponent's front 4.

Blokhin - Andrade to close him down and Forster to wait for him when he comes centrally to try and score
Finney - Davids to close him down and Zebec to wait for him when he tries to cut inside
Ronaldinho - All of Smistik, Davids and Andrade to help shutting him down depending on where the game is being played.

Smistik while being a great DM was also amazing at starting attacks with his excellent passing (especially long passing) after breaking the opponents attacks. Davids will carry the ball forward as well as he so often did. And Andrade was a more than decent passer who played as a hybrid of a midfielder and right back in the 1950 Uruguay setup.

Attack:

The attack is pretty straight forward.

We have two of the all time great wingers in Gento and Matthews. Both were great out wide and coming inwards to score as well. Both were good at starting attacks running from deep as well.

In the centre we have Cubillas, Peru's all time great player. He will be in his element in this setup. Cubillas will try to overload the left side of the pitch along with Gento. We will try to hit the relatively weaker side of the oppositions defense (Sensini and Campbell) as hard as possible.

Upfront we have Alberto Spencer, considered one of the greatest South American Strikers of all time.
He was an ambidextrous striker with lethal pace, off-the-ball movement, heading and balance skills, and excellent finishing, that tore defences to shreds for over a decade

FAQs:

Q. Who are your out balls from the back?

A. Smistik, Davids, Andrade, Tresor and Zebec

Q. Was Zebec a CB? I thought he was a left back?
A. Zebec started his career as an attacking player and played as a left winger. He occasionally played as a little bit defensive CF. In one game against France he played as defensive CF, who had assignment to go back to defense, and guard Raymond Kopa . He did that so successfully, that it seemed that Kopa didn't played at all. On the same game he also played very good in the attack, and journalists gave him 10, for his perfect game.

After all that, he was transformed into a CB and he was very good on that position. During one of the most important games for the national team (qualifications for World Cup 1958), in which Yugoslavia played against Romania he played as CB. Many claim that this was his best game for national team at that position. Every high ball was his (very superior in the air), he won every 1 on 1 play against opposite attacker, also during the game he was in every place in the defense. In one word: Perfection! One of the coaches came to him after the game, grab his shoulder and said: "Are you a man or are you a beast? I've never seen anybody playing the whole 90 minutes so perfect and without any mistake!".

After his stints for national team in CB position , many foreign journalists and football experts wrote that he's one of the greatest discoveries in CB and that he played in those positions even better than on his original position. Many journalists, football experts, coaches and players, from 1950s, agree that Zebec was the best center-half during that era. Some of them even said, that he should be among Best 11 squad of all times.

Q. Why is Andrade playing there?
A. In the older setups, there were no dedicated full backs. There were half backs who were hybrids of defensive midfieders and full backs, who impacted both areas of the pitch. He is playing that same role here
11009.png

Q. Can you tell me a bit more about Smistik and whether this role suits him?
A. Smistik played mainly as centre half back (DM in modern setups) but also as defender. Smistik worked as an animal, always in perfect condition, was master in breaking the opponents attacks and starting offensive moves with his trademark long balls, but also good ball control and dribbling.
He was most known for his fantastic long balls and speed, fighting spirit, great vision and intelligence, as well as powerful play, great endurance and good technique.
He formed the core of the great Austrian Wunderteam along with Sindelar and Nausch. He is playing a similar role as he played in the wunderteam.
608723_Austria.jpg

Q. I know Davids is hard working as feck, but has he played a similar role before?
A. He played in a similar setup in the Ajax 1995 team
aSnqTUf.png

Q. Isn't Alberto Spencer the same guy whom Pele said had a better header than him and is widely known as Magic head? Was that all his game was about?
A. While he was amazing in the air, it was just a part of his game. You don't get to be considered in the top 20 greatest South American players of all time just for your heading skills. He was known to tear teams apart with his pace, dribbling, movement and shooting. He was very hard working as well. Below goal against Real Madrid in the 1966 Intercontinental Cup final shows what he was capable of.


TEAM TUPPET


We are playing in a lop sided 4-2-3-1 formation.

Attack:

Our attack is built around the genius of Ronaldinho, who at his peak is as good as any player in the draft. Ronaldinho is given a free role, starting in the center but allowed to drift all over the attacking third. He is also the main playmaker of my team providing unparalleled creativity and vision for my attack.

As striker we are sporting the greatest Italian striker of all time Luigi Riva. 3 times serie A top scorer and nominated for Ballon D'or ratings 4 times in his career finishing 2nd & 3rd in 69 & 70. Both powerful & technical Riva was a complete forward who can finish any chance but can also create for himself. Here he is instructed to play mostly on the shoulder of last defender, ready to utilize his pace and finishing.

On left side we have another Ballon D'or winner Oleh Blokhin, who is playing in a left forward role. A prolific forward with fantastic pace and dribbling, he would be instructed to cut in toward center, working the inside left channel.

Right winger position is occupied by Legendary Sir Tom Finney. One of England's greatest player ever and a gem of a winger who can play in all attacking positions, Sir Finney was a great dribbler. He'd be playing as an orthodox winger on the right side, providing width and crossing for Riva & Blokhin.

Midfield

Midfield is led by another Ballon D'or winner Josef Masopust who is playing as a B2B midfielder for us. Voted as the greatest Czech player of all time, Masopust was great in attacking, creating and defending. A complete midfielder he loved to go on runs on the left side, which would work well with Blokhin who can cut in when Masopust is with the ball.

Gerhard Hanappi is one of the most versatile player in football history, able to play any outfield position he spent most of his illustrious career in wing half position which roughly translate to defensive midfield in modern formations. He was a combative physical player with great anticipation but also good enough technical skills to qualify as a playmaker. Chosen as 3rd greatest Austrian player by IFFHS, Hanappi would be playing as the deepest midfielder, with disciplined defensive role.

Defense:

One of history's greatest defender in Daniel Passarella is leading the defense as the captain for my team. He'll be playing as a ball playing defende
r who is matched perfectly with Sol Campbell as the stopper partner. As a duo this partnership would be nearly unbeatable in air, which would come really handly against Spencer. Passarella helps us build the game from the back as well.

Both of my fullbacks are defense first player who are also instructed to mostly focus on defensive duties as they are facing two of the best wingers of all time. Schnellinger is probably the best defensive left back along with Maldini and should provide a good fight to Matthews. On the right side Sensini would be playing a conservative role, Sensini was a solid defender who played as center back quite a few times in his career and should be able to hold his own against Gento.

Finally I have an excellent goalkeeper in Mazurkiewicz, who is considered one of the very best to come from SA. Voted 12th in IFFHS world goalkeeper of century (5th in SA GK of century) he provide solid base for my defense to fall back in.
 
If that was meant as Sarcasm, sorry. I wanted to include that part some how :lol:
Yeah, it was a joke — but aside from that it is a brilliant OP.
 
Last edited:
I'll put a few initial thoughts about Tuppet's team before heading out for dinner.

Firstly, its once of the best teams in the draft, no questions about that.

My concerns:

Sir Finney was a great dribbler. He'd be playing as an orthodox winger on the right side, providing width and crossing for Riva & Blokhin.

Finney was a great dribbler agreed. But his game from the right hardly involved crossing. He would constantly like to cut in, even if there was a cross on, he would not usually whip the ball in unless of course he was inside the box and there was a simple tap in or header. His first thought most of the times was to dribble his way through or past it to someone.

Below is one of his best games. You can see he hardly crosses from the right even when there is a player in there to head it in if whipped through.



Next would be Hanappi. From what I have read, he was pretty similar to Masopust in being attack minded who could also do his bits with the defensive side of things in the midfield.
I don't think the role given to him here works. Sure, he wouldn't do a terrible job considering he has played full back as well, but his midfield game was not able playing so deep almost as a DM.
Masopust/Hanappi is not an ideal midfield IMO and would be caught out more often than not..

Lastly, I think this game hardly has any mismatches in terms of match ups.
Except 1. And that is Sensini vs Gento. I don't think Sensini has the pace or ability to put up with him all game long and he will be constantly beaten.
With Cubillas favoring the left side as well, if they gang up on him, he is in for a rough game.
P.S: I know he wasn't a bad defender but I think the gulf in class is huge. Especially when an all time GOAT (Top 2 easily) Gento was all about Pace and beating the best of defenders with ease, while Sensini was certainly not the fastest.
 
I am still trying to wrap my head around the idmanager's tactic. But so far the key ingredient seem that since my wingers would always cut in so your don't need wing backs or full backs ? Which I think is wrong and assuming some of the greatest players are going to act like robots who when seeing that there is no space in midfield are still going to cut into it instead of finding space in wings outside.

There is also the 2 players covering all my players all the time thing which seem wrong and disregards off the ball movement of my players. E.g. When Ronaldinho has ball and we are attacking, is Davids helping Smistik or covering Finney's run? If he is on Finney then he is acting as wingback/fullback and you basically have a one man midfield against Ronaldinho and Smistik has no chance to win that battle. If he is indeed helping Ronaldinho which I think he should then you have no presence on left side to counter Finney. I think Zebec would have to move to the left which stretches your defense. Now how far higher up the pitch would Zebec do that ? would he do it when Finney has crossed the halfway pitch or when he is close to the attacking third etc ? This would decide how Zebec is playing and whether he is acting as a full back or center back.
 
I'll put a few initial thoughts about Tuppet's team before heading out for dinner.

Firstly, its once of the best teams in the draft, no questions about that.

My concerns:



Finney was a great dribbler agreed. But his game from the right hardly involved crossing. He would constantly like to cut in, even if there was a cross on, he would not usually whip the ball in unless of course he was inside the box and there was a simple tap in or header. His first thought most of the times was to dribble his way through or past it to someone.

Below is one of his best games. You can see he hardly crosses from the right even when there is a player in there to head it in if whipped through.
I mean he was a pretty complete player and could play on both side but saying that he couldn't cross is just weird. He often played as outside wingers on both side in W-M formations and he likes to cut in, in a way George best would like to. But saying that one of the greatest winger would not know how to play on wing and always cut in is wrong.
 
Didn't Zebec and Finney faced off each other quite a lot in the 50's? From memory there were a lot of games between Yugoslavia and England at the time.
 
I am still trying to wrap my head around the idmanager's tactic. But so far the key ingredient seem that since my wingers would always cut in so your don't need wing backs or full backs ? Which I think is wrong and assuming some of the greatest players are going to act like robots who when seeing that there is no space in midfield are still going to cut into it instead of finding space in wings outside.

I don't think they will act as robots.
I want them to find space in the wings. Its what they do with that space is what matters.
If you remove the central runs from Blokhin's game, that's more than half the battle won.
If you can neutralize Finney coming inside and restrict him outside, that is again a huge plus.

There is also the 2 players covering all my players all the time thing which seem wrong and disregards off the ball movement of my players. E.g. When Ronaldinho has ball and we are attacking, is Davids helping Smistik or covering Finney's run? If he is on Finney then he is acting as wingback/fullback and you basically have a one man midfield against Ronaldinho and Smistik has no chance to win that battle. If he is indeed helping Ronaldinho which I think he should then you have no presence on left side to counter Finney. I think Zebec would have to move to the left which stretches your defense. Now how far higher up the pitch would Zebec do that ? would he do it when Finney has crossed the halfway pitch or when he is close the attacking third etc ?

Its all about closing down when they get the ball mate. If Ronaldinho has the ball, he won't be given any space centrally to run or find a pass.
He will eventually have to play out wide to Finney or Blokhin.
Whoever gets the ball shall then get the attention of the players mentioned and get closed down.
I don't expect either Finney or Blokhin to impact the game too much staying out wide. They will have to eventually cut in to have the impact they are capable of.
That gives enough time for their designated markers or observers to cover them.
 
Didn't Zebec and Finney faced off each other quite a lot in the 50's? From memory there were a lot of games between Yugoslavia and England at the time.
Think this is the only game where Zebec was playing in midfield and Finney is playing as forward

 
Think this is the only game where Zebec was playing in midfield and Finney is playing as forward



I don't think Zebec played this game.
I checked earlier and Zebec never faced England even in a friendly
 
I mean he was a pretty complete player and could play on both side but saying that he couldn't cross is just weird. He often played as outside wingers on both side in W-M formations and he likes to cut in, in a way George best would like to. But saying that one of the greatest winger would not know how to play on wing and always cut in is wrong.

Cutting in is also part of wing play mate. I mentioned what he didn't do from the right. Not that he couldn't play from the right.
I have shared the 1954 final video which has 10 minutes of Finney footage to justify my claim.
 
I don't think they will act as robots.
I want them to find space in the wings. Its what they do with that space is what matters.
If you remove the central runs from Blokhin's game, that's more than half the battle won.
If you can neutralize Finney coming inside and restrict him outside, that is again a huge plus.
On Finney seriously where did you get the idea that he has to always cut in and score, he was an absolutely awesome crosser of the ball. So you are just going to let them run the wings with no opposition ? and try to stop them at the end when they try to cut in ? Thats a recipe for disaster, there is a reason that we have full backs / wing backs in all modern tactics/formations. You need them to close down the wingers higher up the pitch. otherwise you are just asking for something like this -


Yes your players would stop cutting in most of the times, but if allowed to run the wings time and again one of my player is going to find a way to cut it.

Its all about closing down when they get the ball mate. If Ronaldinho has the ball, he won't be given any space centrally to run or find a pass.
He will eventually have to play out wide to Finney or Blokhin.
Whoever gets the ball shall then get the attention of the players mentioned and get closed down.
I don't expect either Finney or Blokhin to impact the game too much staying out wide. They will have to eventually cut in to have the impact they are capable of.
That gives enough time for their designated markers or observers to cover them.

So not checking the off the ball runs from my players then ? And also Ronaldinho would not be given space to find a pass ?
ANwe1r.gif
 
On Finney seriously where did you get the idea that he has to always cut in and score, he was an absolutely awesome crosser of the ball.

From the right? Maybe you should share a few of his quality crosses from the right mate.
 
Think this is the only game where Zebec was playing in midfield and Finney is playing as forward




Aye, cheers.

Seems they've also faced off each other 2 years later:

https://www.11v11.com/matches/yugoslavia-v-england-11-may-1958-227076/

When Yugoslavia routed them 5-0, but Finney was 36 at the time and again Zebec was playing in midfield.

All in all two quality sides and can't really separate them at the moment.

Probably the wing play would decide the tie, hence delving into the wingers/wing forwards against the fullbacks
 
On my defense as well, Passarella - Campbell partnership is really good fit against Idmanager's attack as both are brilliant in air. Both my fullbacks are asked to stay back and defend against wingers, and both were good defenders first.

From the right? Maybe you should share a few of his quality crosses from the right mate.
I'll try and find, its hard to find videos from Preston. You usually find Finney in English set ups where he is playing on left to accommodate Stanley Matthews but he had a club career and played on right wing there.
 
Zebec and Finney did face each other several times.

Not prime Finney, though. The one mentioned above is from 1956, they also both featured in a 1958 friendly, towards the very end of Finney's England career (he was 36 at the time).

Finney was a brilliant crosser, fwiw. Not a typical crossing machine, of course, but he wasn't a typical winger to begin with.
 
@idmanager I still don't understand the defending from your team. You have a brilliant OP but I still have questions.

Because the lack of of wide defenders I am not sure who is in charge of picking my wide players. And it is an important detail, since checking the run of opposing attacking player is an important concept. In pretty much all the modern formations the defenders know who they are defending against or the zone they are defending. Fullbacks take on their wingers, DMs take on their AMs etc, not just in man marking but because they are both operating in the same areas.

In your tactic though I am not sure who is responsible for Finney for example. Is it Davids or Zebec ? And whats the role of Davids ? Lets say an attack begin with Ronaldinho on the ball and both Blokhin and Finney running down the wing to stretch the defense, what is Davids remit ? is he supposed to go defend against Ronaldinho since he has the ball and allow Finney unchecked deep in your half before Zebec comes in ? or is he checking the run of Finney while leaving Smistik to defend against Dinho ? and same on the other side. I think this should be a clear instruction so Davids know his role on the field, is he a left defender or Defensive midfielders ?
 
Finney was a great dribbler agreed. But his game from the right hardly involved crossing. He would constantly like to cut in, even if there was a cross on, he would not usually whip the ball in unless of course he was inside the box and there was a simple tap in or header. His first thought most of the times was to dribble his way through or past it to someone.

Below is one of his best games. You can see he hardly crosses from the right even when there is a player in there to head it in if whipped through.
It's actually one of his worst games :lol:
Tom Finney said:
My display in the FA Cup final against West Bromwich Albion at Wembley was my worst in a North End shirt

I'm sure that he is slightly overreacting, but still.
 
Finney was a great dribbler agreed. But his game from the right hardly involved crossing.
FWITW I don't think that it's true. I've watched pretty much everything there is to watch of Finney and when he played on the right he crossed more often than not — and when he played on the left he was more prone to cutting in, although he was comfortable doing both regardless of the wing he was playing at. He wasn't a Matthews-like winger, but he fits fantastic in Tuppet's set up.

Plus his England performances are more apt than his Preston ones, since his Preston team was shocking and he had to everything himself (hence the amount of dribbles in the FA Cup finals). He was a bit different when he played for England with the likes of Mortensen etc.
 
From the right? Maybe you should share a few of his quality crosses from the right mate.
I'll try and find, its hard to find videos from Preston. You usually find Finney in English set ups where he is playing on left to accommodate Stanley Matthews but he had a club career and played on right wing there.

There are tons of crosses from the right as well
 
No idea what VR Andrade is doing in that role and why that formation was chosen.

What's wrong with?

..........Davids......Smistik..........
Zebec...Forster...Tresor...Andrade

I recall Zebec being quite adventurous in attack and this formation esp with Davids ahead doesn't seem ideal.
 
This draft is very interesting with many creative tactical systems.

Will participate in the discussions later as I need to watch some central midfielders here
 
No idea what VR Andrade is doing in that role and why that formation was chosen.

What's wrong with?

..........Davids......Smistik..........
Zebec...Forster...Tresor...Andrade

I recall Zebec being quite adventurous in attack and this formation esp with Davids ahead doesn't seem ideal.

out of all people you were the last person id expect this comment tbh
personally i love it, something new and in theory i can see it work, only problem is that tuppet also has a great team
 
out of all people you were the last person id expect this comment tbh
personally i love it, something new and in theory i can see it work, only problem is that tuppet also has a great team

Not on the formation, but more on the personnel.
Zebec/Davids in that formation have too many overlaps.
As for Andrade, that role is perfect for Jose Leandro and not for Victor Rodriguez.​
 
Okay, am back. Firstly, since I have not seen any response or discussion around the below 2 players, I am requoting what I posted earlier.

Next would be Hanappi. From what I have read, he was pretty similar to Masopust in being attack minded who could also do his bits with the defensive side of things in the midfield.
I don't think the role given to him here works. Sure, he wouldn't do a terrible job considering he has played full back as well, but his midfield game was not able playing so deep almost as a DM.
Masopust/Hanappi is not an ideal midfield IMO and would be caught out more often than not..

Lastly, I think this game hardly has any mismatches in terms of match ups.
Except 1. And that is Sensini vs Gento. I don't think Sensini has the pace or ability to put up with him all game long and he will be constantly beaten.
With Cubillas favoring the left side as well, if they gang up on him, he is in for a rough game.

P.S: I know he wasn't a bad defender but I think the gulf in class is huge. Especially when an all time GOAT (Top 2 easily) Gento was all about Pace and beating the best of defenders with ease, while Sensini was certainly not the fastest.
 
No idea what VR Andrade is doing in that role and why that formation was chosen.

What's wrong with?

..........Davids......Smistik..........
Zebec...Forster...Tresor...Andrade

I recall Zebec being quite adventurous in attack and this formation esp with Davids ahead doesn't seem ideal.

Feck, should have posted a bit more info in the OP about the players you mention.
Stupid me, I don't deserve your vote EAP.
 
tbh the issue here imo is tactical. in any 3 man defensive formations you usually take 1 person from attack and add it to defense thus making your 3-4-3, 3-5-2 or 3-4-2-1 etc. Now Idmanager's formation has both 4 attackers and 3 defenders it would mean either there is only 1 midfielder or no full backs. The only tactic I know that employ similar setup was LVG's Ajax but that was a typical Van Gaal's team which require the wingers to work really hard and you would never associate Matthews or Gento with that tactic.

I think this tactic would never work consistently in real life. Idmanager has put arrows on both Davids and Andrade to make it seem like they are playing in two positions but it not only doesn't work but confuses the defenders of their prime duty as well. It needs to be clear what role they are playing. I also thought that a simple 4-2-3-1 would work much better here as Andrade and Zebec as full backs and Davids & Smistik in midfield.

His current defensive setup against 3 Ballon D'or winners in Ronaldinho, Blokhin & Masopust as well as two legendary attackers in Finney & Riva seem very inadequate to me.
 
Okay, am back. Firstly, since I have not seen any response or discussion around the below 2 players, I am requoting what I posted earlier.
Hanappi was a defensive player first and foremost. He was versatile and sometimes played as a striker as well as a center back but he was mostly the defensive partner to Ocwirk in Austria setup. You can see his defensive positioning in this game where he is playing as a defender

 
Ok, time to address a couple of things:

1. Davids - He is given the responsibility to track the movement of two players based on the game situation. Not the first time someone is using this tactic. Its not rocket science. Not every setup uses man marking to every player on the pitch. Its a team game where players are expected to help each other out and adapt as per where the ball is and who has it. Finney is his primary responsibility and Dinho his second.
As an example and not blue fecking print, if Ronaldinho is moving towards the Finney flank, Andrade shall help out Smistik while Davids can cover Finney. Vice versa on the other side.

2. Finney and the wing play - Again, I have time and again said his game play involved a lot of cutting in. Crossing from the right was not what defined him as winger on the right side or something which he used extensively (as in average number of times he used it per game). Sure,across a long career, he might have had a few assists using crosses from the right, but that is not sufficient. Again, it does not mean that he will never cross. Its just that if his impact is limited to crossing, I would be very glad with it considering he was not a great crosses or something with his weak foot and considering I have enough strong centre backs to deal with the balls in.
 
As for Sensini vs Gento I would hold my hands up and agree that it is the best route for you. I feel the same way about Ronaldinho vs Smistik btw. The only saving grace for me is
1. Sensini was a very defensive player playing as CB, Sweeper & DM in his career. He would do his best to contain Gento, would fail sometime but still work hard.
2. Gento's best weapon in his crossing to Spencer would be somewhat subdued with my awesome central defense with both Passarella and Campbell working brilliantly in air.
 
Hanappi was a defensive player first and foremost. He was versatile and sometimes played as a striker as well as a center back but he was mostly the defensive partner to Ocwirk in Austria setup. You can see his defensive positioning in this game where he is playing as a defender



Next would be Hanappi. From what I have read, he was pretty similar to Masopust in being attack minded who could also do his bits with the defensive side of things in the midfield.
I don't think the role given to him here works. Sure, he wouldn't do a terrible job considering he has played full back as well, but his midfield game was not able playing so deep almost as a DM.
Masopust/Hanappi is not an ideal midfield IMO and would be caught out more often than not..

Playing as a defender is very different from playing as a DM alongside another attacking B2B midfielder whose credentials were majorly attacking and decent while defending.
His games in midfield majorly involved him in a similar game style as Masopust.
I have already mentioned in my quote above he played as a defender.
 
Ok, time to address a couple of things:

1. Davids - He is given the responsibility to track the movement of two players based on the game situation. Not the first time someone is using this tactic. Its not rocket science. Not every setup uses man marking to every player on the pitch. Its a team game where players are expected to help each other out and adapt as per where the ball is and who has it. Finney is his primary responsibility and Dinho his second.
As an example and not blue fecking print, if Ronaldinho is moving towards the Finney flank, Andrade shall help out Smistik while Davids can cover Finney. Vice versa on the other side.

2. Finney and the wing play - Again, I have time and again said his game play involved a lot of cutting in. Crossing from the right was not what defined him as winger on the right side or something which he used extensively (as in average number of times he used it per game). Sure,across a long career, he might have had a few assists using crosses from the right, but that is not sufficient. Again, it does not mean that he will never cross. Its just that if his impact is limited to crossing, I would be very glad with it considering he was not a great crosses or something with his weak foot and considering I have enough strong centre backs to deal with the balls in.
1. It is less of rocket science and more of magic when the two people he is defending against are Finney and Ronaldinho and he somehow manage to defend against both. I would ask again if Ronaldinho has ball in my attack would Davids check the run of Finney or defend against Ronaldnho ?

2. Their is not much to add Harms has posted a video showing Finney's work as a winger. He was a width of the pitch player like George Best just because he was able to cut in does not mean that he would not utilize the width of right side and throw in crosses. And if he is allowed unchecked deep in your half do you believe that He could be stopped from cutting in every time ?
 
As for Sensini vs Gento I would hold my hands up and agree that it is the best route for you. I feel the same way about Ronaldinho vs Smistik btw. The only saving grace for me is
1. Sensini was a very defensive player playing as CB, Sweeper & DM in his career. He would do his best to contain Gento, would fail sometime but still work hard.
2. Gento's best weapon in his crossing to Spencer would be somewhat subdued with my awesome central defense with both Passarella and Campbell working brilliantly in air.

Gento scored plenty of goals as well and crosses don't always have to be on the head.
I can see him beating time and again, almost with every move. I can see a chance being created everytime Gento gets the ball at his feet considering Sensini not being fast enough.

Not to forget, Spencer and Cubillas is a great partnership who would both revel from service from Gento both at the feet and head.

As far as I can see, Gento is in for putting a MoTM performance here.