The inclusion of the Korean GP is crazy.
Korea's circuit is in the middle of nowhere and they aren't particularly bothered about F1 anyway so they had no fans at every race they staged. It's also not a particularly interesting or engaging circuit so the races have been dire as well.
21 races is far too many and sticking an Asian race just a week before a European race is likely to be a logistical nightmare. Not to mention the added costs of so many races when we've had two teams die this year plus others struggling (Lotus, Force India, Sauber).
Ridiculous.
Could this amazing explanation be true? From the BBC:
Next year, the rules say that the number of engines drivers can use in a season is to be cut from five to four. But that presupposes there are no more than 20 races.
The rules say each driver will be allowed five engines "if the number of events in the championship, as originally scheduled, exceeds 20".
The key phrase being "as originally scheduled".
The calendar announced on Wednesday is the "confirmed" schedule. Yet one of the 21 races on it - Korea - is "to be confirmed".
So, now the Korean Grand Prix is on the calendar, teams can use five engines again in 2015. And that does not change even if the race drops off at a later date.
Meanwhile, at least one engine manufacturer has been pushing to keep the limit on engines at five for next season, because of the complexity of the engines, reliability problems suffered in 2014 and the need of Mercedes' rivals to push development to try to close the gap to the new world champions.
Putting a fantasy race on the calendar, that no-one believes will happen, only to withdraw it at a later date is a painless way of ensuring this happens without the usual arguments over rules, a cynic would say.
Knowing all that, do you think there will be a Korean Grand Prix next year?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/formula1/