I''ve never actually liked Lingard, but I'm surprised how most of you criticise him for talking to Scholes and not Scholes for saying he got this from Lingard on TV!
It's more that Lingard is currently employed by the club, and has a direct obligation to the club, including the coaching staff, and team mates.
Scholes has left the club,and while we fans might still love him, and he might have certain connections with the club, he isn't bound by any duty of confidence to Manchester United. If anything he has more of a duty to whoever he is working for currently, who happen to be a media organisation.
Lingard may think Scholes had some form of obligation to him not to reveal the information, but that still doesn't constitute Scholes having an obligation to Manchester United not to say anything.That's why it would be a fallacy to think the leak is from Scholes. The leak originated with Lingard, it was magnified by Scholes.
Of course I might tell my partner about stuff at work (for the sake of this lets say she had worked for my employer a few years earlier and was held in high regard), and I do that because I can trust her not to tell anyone, but if I was wrong about that, and she said something to one of her friends and it got back to my employer then the responsibility would be entirely mine. I might feel betrayed by my partner, but she didn't have a duty to my employer.
Not to say that as a fan I can't be annoyed at Scholes.
The good thing is that surely this isn't exactly news. It's irritating, but it's only some degree of confirmation on what everyone already knows. It could have been a throwaway comment, or it could have been intended to be leaked but the club aren't going to do anything about it. Best to just get to the end of the season and focus on fixing things so things are changed by the time next season starts.