WeasteDevil
Guest
Even Manchester United isn't in bloody Manchester!
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Even Manchester United isn't in bloody Manchester! </strong><hr></blockquote>
Concepted in Manchester. Shaped by Salford. Envy of the world.
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Even Manchester United isn't in bloody Manchester! </strong><hr></blockquote>
that I know.. i was there once, went the Mega store (the newest one i believe). too bad the stadium was closed so i couldn't get in.. it was before the season started.. did catch the Charity Shield between United and Newcastle tho.. was in Wembley, the last feckin row of the stadium (pitch side, not behind the goals). i could only see about the first 10 rows of the Newcastle fans on the other side, 'kinhell. but it was all worth it anyhow!
Originally posted by RUnited:
<strong>you study the Atlas? </strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
No, I just happen to know a little bit about the area where I was born (That was in Trafford BTW to be exact Urmston).
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
No, I just happen to know a little bit about the area where I was born (That was in Trafford BTW to be exact Urmston).</strong><hr></blockquote>
so you were what? 5, 10 minutes away from the stadium?
Originally posted by RUnited:
<strong>
so you were what? 5, 10 minutes away from the stadium?</strong><hr></blockquote>
10 yes, 10!
Originally posted by reelworld:
<strong>This is just stupid.
The boy had just outplayed perhaps the only CM comparable to Keane and now you ask if he's worth a place in the squad or not??
CM isn't even his prefered position, but he played there like he played there for years. Give credits when it's due. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Agree with this. Phil's had his best season in years. He's shown he can do a good job in central midfield, and not just in the Arsenal game either. When he does shite, people say he should be sold. When he does great, people say he sould be sold. The Nevilles get enough grief from ABUs as it is, can't we at least close ranks around the lads so long as they continue to do their best, and let Fergie make decisions whether their best is good enough for United or not?
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>A Manutd's level player,is a player that gives his soul to the team. He may be a reserve but he knows that he may be utilised any day and is capable to play equally well like the first team.
His class is seen everytime he enters the pitch, and he plays regulary WELL because that is why he is paid. Every player can give a good game ever now and then, but that is not enough if you to satisfy Manutd's demands.
You may be a reserve but PPL love you. They put their trust in you and wont worry if a player gets injured because they know that you are capable.
Do you think that P Nev is at Manutd's level?
You decide</strong><hr></blockquote>
You ask us to decide if Phil Neville is good enough. The answer on this thread is an almost unanimous yes. If Keane had kept Vieira that quiet we would be talking about Keano's best performance of the year. What more can Phil, a back up player, do?
I know this will upset you but Phil Neville is Man Utd's level because he can probably cover defensive midfield AND full back better than anyone else in the country.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Last week ppl accused me that I am always against Blanc, before that against G Nev, before that Barthez and before that Giggs and May.
Critising is one thing, hating another</strong><hr></blockquote>
Serious question. Do you have anything positive to say about any of the players at the club you claim to support?
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>
2 He is too old now to drastically improve
</strong><hr></blockquote>
I don't think drastic improvement is needed. I have been very happy with him so far this season.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong> when we know that he will never be at our level.</strong><hr></blockquote>
When you say 'we' who do you mean? A couple of months ago you would have had many agree with you. After seeing his performances this season many realise Phil is a lot better than he was given credit for. Most people are less blinkered than you.
We have seen (hopefully) the early stages of a great defenders career (O'Shea), the realisation of promise from another (Brown) and the emergence of a quality utility player (P Neville). These three bonus players plus, possibly, Forlan and Fortune mean we have much greater depth than most of us realised.
Be grateful that all we need is a bit of tinkering (ie 1 or 2 signings) and we are back on track.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Then answer me this.
If he is so good then why SAF uses him as cover of the cover of the cover?
Either SAF is not good enough
ORRRR</strong><hr></blockquote>
Or Phil Nevillei is a squad player. Not good enough to dislodge any of the first team players, but good enough to prove capable cover for several positions.
Keeping on crying this guy gets 30k a week is poorer than looking at Seba's pricetag all the time.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>
P Nev is not a utility man. As stated The list of players before him is endless</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yes he is.
Originally posted by devilish:
So you pay a 4 tier player a 30 Grand a week?<hr></blockquote>
Rather than looking at the figure in isolation, try looking at it in comparison to what the others might be paid. If our if Tier 1 players are paid £90-100,000, Tier 2 £60-80 grand, Tier 3 £50-30 grand etc then it's surely only logical that a Tier 3/4 player would be on £30,000. FFS, Mark Bosnich collects £40,000 sitting on his arse; at least Phil earnt his money on Saturday!
And you keep going on and on about us getting an Escude or whoever but the point you keep missing is that even if we did indeed buy Escude, he would be a 1st or 2nd tier player and we would still need tier 3/4 players as covers for him - if not Phil Neville then someone else. And that someone else would not be world class - he would be a utility man just like Phil Neville!
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>
And after all O Shea can give a better job.After all He was more effective on the left in the past few weeks than P Neville in a life time. </strong><hr></blockquote>
Obviously you were not around in 1995/96...
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Let us bring a young player that has hopes of winning a place and provide some competition(ppl like escude) rather than P Neville.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
And before long, either 'competition' or the player 'competition' replaced, wants out. Then what?
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Well Im sorry but P Nev is not our level. Any decent player (as we seen it in the past) can take his place and I care too much for him to see him end like that
He is a non hoper at OT</strong><hr></blockquote>
You can't replace a Red heart with a bought player. Phil Neville earns his 30 grand a week, he doesn't sit on his arse like Bosnich.
You've contradicted yourself by saying a "United level" player is one whose soul belongs to the club, and then saying that we should sell Phil Neville because "he is not our level". Which is it?
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Our level when? Even SAF himself rate him low. He prefar to play his dog rather than P Neville <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
I guess I missed that game starring SAF's dog...
Is Phil Neville Manchester United level? What the feck is that anyway? People like you didn't want Gilberto Silva this Summer because he wasn't our level, now they say it was a great Wenger signing and moan about it and curse our scouts.
Do you mean is he RVN/Scholes/Faerdinand standard? Obviously not. He is not regular first team material. You will always be able to think of a better option in any position.
That said, the whole point is that he can perform to a decent (yet rarely world class) standard in many positions. That makes him very handy to cover many eventualities as a sub during a game or during an injury crisis.
After all, he has been stand-in as LB, RB, RW and CM this season as and when the injury list required.
An alternative of his standard for each of these positions would work out at a lot more than 30k.
And, well, he IS a red if it counts for anything in your view of football. It does in mine.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>A utility man is a player who plays when the senior player get injured. He has an identity and a position</strong><hr></blockquote>
A utility player does NOT have a set posiyion. If he did he would not be a utility player.
Originally posted by devilish:
<strong>Then answer me this.
If he is so good then why SAF uses him as cover of the cover of the cover?
Either SAF is not good enough
ORRRR</strong><hr></blockquote>
He is cover of the cover of the cover because we have an injury crisis. When Keane, Butt and Fortune are out what do you expect to do? Play with ten men or send on Fergie's dog?
I am convinced that Phil is a better player than Fergie's dog. I am not sure who knows more about football, you or the dog.
Originally posted by dicko:
<strong>
I am convinced that Phil is a better player than Fergie's dog. I am not sure who knows more about football, you or the dog.</strong><hr></blockquote>
My money's on the canine...