The comprehensive Ronaldo thread

Just to clarify we are feeling sorry for this guy?

Ronaldo confession from Spiegel:

"I fecked her from the side. She made herself available. She was lying on her side, in bed, and I entered her from behind. It was rough. We didn't change position. 5/7 minutes. She said that she didn't want to, but she made herself available. The whole time it was rough, I turned her onto her side, and it was fast. Maybe she got some bruises when I grabbed her. (...) She didn't want to 'give it to me,' instead she jerked me off. I don't know any more exactly what she said when she was jerking me off. But she kept saying no. 'Don't do it' -- 'I'm not like the others.' I apologized afterwards."
This has been discredited and the case dismissed. Better be careful, and the Caf better be careful about bandying discredited documents, which were part of the reason the case was dismissed.
 
When you take into account his once in a hundred years talent, his trophy cabinet is ridiculously low. When you put things in perspective and actually watched the guy play however, you understand why he's rightfully up there with the top 5 footballers of all time. You could make the same case with R9 and he got two career ending injuries on top of that. That's why I'll never understand people who only swear by stats.

For all his incredible numbers and achievements which I fully acknowledge, Cristiano Ronaldo never made me dream like the former two did. He's the most accomplished athlete in the game and the best header of the ball I've ever seen though.

Well, Maradona never played for a super team, so his trophy cabinet is as full as you would expect.

80s football had great teams, but there wasn't Bosman ruling to build super teams yet.

Cristiano played for stacked United and stacked Real Madrid.
 
Well, Maradona never played for super team, so his trophy cabinet is as full as you would expect.

80s football had great teams, but there wasn't Bosman law to build super teams yet.

Cristiano played for stacked United and stacked Real
That's what I meant with putting things in perspective.
 
This has been discredited and the case dismissed. Better be careful, and the Caf better be careful about bandying discredited documents, which were part of the reason the case was dismissed.

The documents weren't discredited as far as I know? The reason the case was dismissed was because of the way that the documents were procured right?

Fruit of the poisonous tree or something?

If they were discredited .. how much did Ronaldo sue DER Spiegel for printing that document?
 
counting the Nations League as a major trophy is the funniest bit
I swear I thought I had lost it. Kept thinking 2 , how is it 2. Was thinking it have been some Fifa continent tourney or something.
Then I read nations league :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
The documents weren't discredited as far as I know? The reason the case was dismissed was because of the way that the documents were procured right?

Fruit of the poisonous tree or something?
Yep. Cristiano's camp did try to discredit it obviously and did a good job of it in the court of public opinion, but the court only dismissed it on the basis of how it was obtained, not because it was declared fake or not-reliable iirc
 
Yep. Cristiano's camp did try to discredit it obviously and did a good job of it in the court of public opinion, but the court only dismissed it on the basis of how it was obtained, not because it was declared fake or not-reliable iirc
Yep, the fanboys like to pretend that it was disproved but this was never the case, as you say how it was obtained wasn’t legal so it wasn’t admissible evidence.
 
Which doesn't mean it wasn't fake or not-realiable, just that the court didn't even get to the point of ascertaining whether it was or not because it was inadmissible in the first place

For the record: I believe Kathryn Mayorga. It's the reason i dislike the guy nowadays
 
Yep. Cristiano's camp did try to discredit it obviously and did a good job of it in the court of public opinion, but the court only dismissed it on the basis of how it was obtained, not because it was declared fake or not-reliable iirc
But wasn’t it client / attorney privilege? So it didn’t matter how it was obtained really.
 
But wasn’t it client / attorney privilege? So it didn’t matter how it was obtained really.
Dunno mate, i'm going by memory here, no intention to look it up. Possible i might be wrong
 
Yep. Cristiano's camp did try to discredit it obviously and did a good job of it in the court of public opinion, but the court only dismissed it on the basis of how it was obtained, not because it was declared fake or not-reliable iirc

His PR team must have worked well since I'm being admonished for quoting it :lol: along with (unfounded) claims of the leak being discredited (along with vague threats of potential lawsuits).

Not saying that he definitely should have been convicted based on that evidence in a court of law ( Breaching attorney client privilege/ Fruit of the poisonous tree etc) but it's a weak defence for his actions considering the content of the leak.
 
His PR team must have worked well since I'm being admonished for quoting it :lol: along with (unfounded) claims of the leak being discredited (along with vague threats of potential lawsuits).

Yeah you'd have to be a total apologist not to realise what kind of person he is.
 


She basically wants him to do the Piers meme :lol: :lol:

FizavkaUUAAeggr

:lol:

So it's not just Cristiano, his whole family are bunch of weirdos it seems.
 
:lol:

So it's not just Cristiano, his whole family are bunch of weirdos it seems.

Didn't his other sister "threaten" Ten Hag the other day by saying karma exists? His mother, sisters, girlfriend are all super weird.
 
Absolutely not. This is the problem with Messi vs Ronaldo debates, they get reduced to singular stake points in order to sell this narrative that they are close and fighting tooth and nail to see who is the better player. In order to make the Messi vs Ronaldo a debate, the discourse has been focused solely on goals, that way the comparison and illusion of them being close to each other is maintained because that's the only metric Ronaldo goes toe to toe with Messi.

As football players, not just goal scorer, meaning the whole package no one has come close to Messi among his peers. He's simply been the best player for the duration of his peek/prime. Ronaldo has challenged him as a goal scorer but that's where it stops.
Haha but Ronaldo has the Euro Cup with Portugal, 3 x Consecutive Champ League trophies. And he's likely to win the World Cup. You cannot ignore these.
 
Yep, the fanboys like to pretend that it was disproved but this was never the case, as you say how it was obtained wasn’t legal so it wasn’t admissible evidence.

Out of court he paid her a fortune to drop it and go away. It’s generally not something innocent people do.
 
I also saw him a couple of times and he was on the losing side both times as well, the United-Barca game was one but I also saw him play for Argentina against England at Wembley in 1980, a certain Ray Wilkins played in both matches and definitely had something to do with the fact that he didn't do a whole lot in both games
That’s the only England match I’ve ever been to! I was in London on a training course for my first job and someone in the office had secured a few tickets.

Much as I enjoyed it, I felt dirty cheering two goals from evil scouser David Johnson. He died last month :(

Wilkins was at the top of his game then, having nearly just led United to a league title. He spent nearly all the following season injured, and I reckon was never the same player afterwards.
 
It’s generally not something innocent people do.

Also sued DER Spiegel about the tax leak articles (and lost) but not the rape accusations leak articles (despite threatening that he would).. that's abit strange.

Personally I'd prefer to be known as an alleged tax dodger than an alleged rapist!
 
That’s the only England match I’ve ever been to! I was in London on a training course for my first job and someone in the office had secured a few tickets.

Much as I enjoyed it, I felt dirty cheering two goals from evil scouser David Johnson. He died last month :(

Wilkins was at the top of his game then, having nearly just led United to a league title. He spent nearly all the following season injured, and I reckon was never the same player afterwards.
It was my first England match at Wembley, saw them a few years rearlier at Hampden against the Jocks
 
I think title of this thread should be slightly modified. "The comprehensive end of Ronaldo thread" sounds more up to date considering what's happening.
 
This has been discredited and the case dismissed. Better be careful, and the Caf better be careful about bandying discredited documents, which were part of the reason the case was dismissed.

it wasn’t discredited, it was the way that information was obtained that they couldn’t use it in court
 
I hate these type of stats. It's as if the likes Pepe, Ricardo Carvalho, Moutinho, Deco and a few others didn't play a massive role in Portugal becoming a balanced and savvy team. Ronaldo was great but this need that some have to make everything about is offensive. The same was done with Real Madrid which was even more baffling when you consider the amount of additions required between Ronaldo signing and the peak years of Real Madrid.
Sure, but I’d say having scored 118 goals in 195 caps over that period would means he will naturally get most of the credits. It’s similar to how people giving most credits to Pele in helping Brazil won 3 WC, when in fact it was a super team comprised of many great players too.
 
Sure, but I’d say having scored 118 goals in 195 caps over that period would means he will naturally get most of the credits. It’s similar to how people giving most credits to Pele in helping Brazil won 3 WC, when in fact it was a super team comprised of many great players too.
He's had a fantastic career and he's been the best player in a very good Portugal team, just like he was the best player in a fantastic Real Madrid and the last couple of years in his first stint with us. He deserves a lot of praise for what he's done on the pitch throughout his career, really extraordinary stuff. He wouldn't have the same lagacy without a lot of fantastic footballers around him along the way though. The ESPN poster with the championship stats for Portugal with and without him is extremely unbalanced, too simplistic and without context at best.
That said: He's become an intolerable character and the football he's been bringing the last few years has been a burden too heavy for the teams he's played for to lift. There's not a top club in the world he wouldn't make worse with his presence. He's like the definition of a charmless man, and it's becoming more embarressing to watch him by the minute, without him showing even the faintest glimps of selfawareness or humility. It's a bit sad to watch him implode into a laughing stock, but it is 100% his own doing.