FrankDrebin
Don't call me Shirley
Walid Cheddira.
We do not know how Martial will perform in this system and that is a risk. He was poor while on loan and is injury prone so an understudy will be important unless ETH rates Rashford in that role.Was thinking, a category of players that haven’t been discussed — in a way, wouldn’t getting someone on par with where Gakpo was last summer be more or less a perfect buy?
Like a 19-21 y/o who haven’t quite broken out yet?
Our top 4 is ‘set’ with Martial; Rash-Bruno-Antony, and if we aren’t getting someone really good, we are buying “depth”.
Jonathan Davis has been mentioned, but he seems to be one of those Fabrizio Romano pump n dump plays.
Youssoufa Moukoko is one, have only seen him a few times, haven’t really stood out but he is really young and was OK. Don’t know if he is “just” an early bloomer who might never be great or if he has a ton of development left, but he could be an option.
Perhaps someone like Adam Hlożek?
Dealing with Levy makes this deal virtually impossible.Go for Kane. Honestly, there isn’t a better striker out there than him. Last year into his contract, would be gettable for 60-70m. People say he’s 30, I say he was never reliant on his pace and he’s still got 3-4 yrs easily. Name me a better striker than him we can get. Not one. None.
Go for Kane. Honestly, there isn’t a better striker out there than him. Last year into his contract, would be gettable for 60-70m. People say he’s 30, I say he was never reliant on his pace and he’s still got 3-4 yrs easily. Name me a better striker than him we can get. Not one. None.
As I said last year of his contract doesn’t make him hold all the cards. He may ask for abit more money but he isn’t letting Kane go for absolutely nothing.Dealing with Levy makes this deal virtually impossible.
Don't knock him - one of only a handful of players to have scored over 100 goals with two different clubs.We been linked with Huntelaar yet?
1) last year of his contract after this season. He isn’t letting Kane go for free.1) Daniel. Levy.
2) He’s 30, and yes he is fantastic and has a few more years left but we can’t keep going out and getting 30+ year old forwards. At some point we need to nip this in the bud.
3) If Kane leaves Spurs now it’s only to a club where consistent silverware is nigh on guaranteed. He would quite happily be a one club man and a Spurs legend. He isn’t unhappy there, the only reason his head has been turned is for trophies. Why would he go to another club that while yes is looking on the up still isn’t looking like a Prem or European cup challenger for certain for the next few years.
Obviously I’d love Kane but there’s challenges blocking that, and there’s downsides. It just isn’t happening.
Now Haaland is at City for potentially 2-3 years I don’t see Kane leaving Spurs (unless he goes and has a one off season somewhere in his last year).
There are a lot of decent options on that list, certainly decent enough that if we signed them we could be hopeful they'd be good buys and improve us. There just isn't a super-obvious stand-out buy. All depends on what type of player ETH wants and what prices they're available for. Be interesting to see what direction we go in.
1) last year of his contract after this season. He isn’t letting Kane go for free.
2) 30 isn’t old. Posters need to let go of this thing. There’s a difference between signing Kane at 30 and the likes of Cavani, Ronaldo etc at 35-36. Literally a world of difference. Strikers these days play well into their 30’s. Kane isn’t going anywhere till 33-34. Never reliant on pace and still chasing Shearer’s record.
3) Lack of options. City, Liverpool aren’t gonna sign him. He won’t sign for Arsenal or chelsea. He desperately wants Shearer’s record so he isn’t going to la Liga or bundesliga. If we do well under ten hag and get top 4 and want him then we are always a better bet than spurs for trophies. It’s not even an argument. Plus massive rise for him in wages and most possibly under new owners we could land him easily.
There is no way that Toney will sell for 50m or less, more likely at least 70m.
I am sure that ETH is keeping tabs on Kudos at Ajax.
I would agree if spurs finish higher than us and especially we don’t finish even into the top 4.I think it's too much of a risk for Kane to leave for us. Spurs are 10 up on goal difference from us (better indicator long-term) and they're not an old team. They can definitely upgrade at LCB, CB, add a creative midfielder and their wingbacks (the key players in the Conte team) aren't good enough. Apart from a #10 to come off the bench, those aren't the most expensive positions to sign so Spurs spending 30-40M on 4/5 of them and getting a breakout from one of the younger players (Sessegnon, Spence, Devine, Royal, Udogie) to plug the 5th hole actually seems quite reasonable.
If he goes it's for guaranteed trophies at Bayern Munich or to replace Lewandowski or Benzema for say 2 years in Spain, or even to Italy where he'll age best and can even be the best player in the league and win the title as a star like Lukaku did.
1) last year of his contract after this season. He isn’t letting Kane go for free.
2) 30 isn’t old. Posters need to let go of this thing. There’s a difference between signing Kane at 30 and the likes of Cavani, Ronaldo etc at 35-36. Literally a world of difference. Strikers these days play well into their 30’s. Kane isn’t going anywhere till 33-34. Never reliant on pace and still chasing Shearer’s record.
3) Lack of options. City, Liverpool aren’t gonna sign him. He won’t sign for Arsenal or chelsea. He desperately wants Shearer’s record so he isn’t going to la Liga or bundesliga. If we do well under ten hag and get top 4 and want him then we are always a better bet than spurs for trophies. It’s not even an argument. Plus massive rise for him in wages and most possibly under new owners we could land him easily.
2) 30 isn’t old. Posters need to let go of this thing. There’s a difference between signing Kane at 30 and the likes of Cavani, Ronaldo etc at 35-36. Literally a world of difference. Strikers these days play well into their 30’s. Kane isn’t going anywhere till 33-34. Never reliant on pace and still chasing Shearer’s record.
He’s just moved to Milan not so long ago and I don’t think he’s really the profile United need. Not really a nine but more of a second striker/wingfielder type. Very promising but l thought I’d read he’d been having a tough transition at MilanCharles De Ketelaere is amazing on FM23, not sure about real life though, anyone any thoughts or views on this lad?
Vlahovic would be another good choice, uncertainty over Juve even remaining in Serie A, potentially him wanting to leave and we could be the destination for him.
Yeah he looks like the best option overall for January. Should be available and with the price on Ramos rising Vlahovic is looking better and better.Vlahovic would rank quite highly for me. No idea how gettable he would be, especially in January, but I would hope we might be able to exploit Juve's financial situation at some point.
Go for Kane. Honestly, there isn’t a better striker out there than him. Last year into his contract, would be gettable for 60-70m. People say he’s 30, I say he was never reliant on his pace and he’s still got 3-4 yrs easily. Name me a better striker than him we can get. Not one. None.
Another 30 something year old in decline, really you would take that?
Yeah, Sesko is the No 1 for me if I could chose any striker in the world except Haaland. For various reasons, he gets underrated. If you haven't seen him much I recon its only natural to be a little skeptical about another RB Salzburg striker, how good is his competition really? But he hasn't just done it in Austria, he has also performed in the CL and especially been absolutely spectacular in the Nations League for Slovenia. I saw Slovenia play both against the Serbs and Norway the last fall, and in both games he was the MOTM among the outfield players at least. He and Oblak really carries that team.
He just got it all. 6'4. Really fast. He is 6'4, but just like Haaland, it doesn't at all show in his speed. He gets to top speed really fast. Looking at guys like Vlahovic and Schmacca and the likes, they move well -- for someone their size. Sesko moves well, period. Excellent in the pressing game. Great in the air. Finishes really well with both feet. Check out the below goal with his weak foot, its just what he does:
When he plays, he just does all the right things, definitely reminiscent of Haaland. When he takes runs against a defensive line, he immediately catch your attention just like with Haaland because its with the exact same type of fury. Just like Haaland, he shots really well with both feet even when he is running at absolute full speed. Its something they must be focusing a lot in the RB academy. Like we all know how it is when someone is storming down on the goal at full speed with a defender hanging on and they try to get of a shot despite literary losing the angle by the milli-second, odds are that the shot won't hit anything close to the net. Not with Sesko.
He is not Haaland 2.0. But he is from my POV clearly the best alternative out there.
I agree he's strong, fast for his size, a good finisher and has a good header in him, but he doesn't have the goalgetter instinct of the best strikers. He just doesn't get into good goalscoring positions often enough and lacks that position awareness. 7 goals in 25 games for a dominant Salzburg side this season just isn't good enough, especially when he's not particularly good at bringing his teammates into play high up in the field either.
I'm still convinced Moukoko should be our main target. Just turned 18 and is the most natural #9 and finisher out there not named Haaland. Will score shitloads whereever he goes even though he's still far from the finished article.