Ecstatic
Cutie patootie!
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 13,787
- Supports
- PsG
I thought Leo Junior was a LB
Yes - and something similar was true at both A. Madrid and Inter. He was defensively excellent, but not actually a holder: He moved about, covered lots of ground, hounded and intercepted, etc.
Francisco Maturana Colombian Coach at the time said:[he dribbled around Gary Lineker at Wembley] as if it was a park game back home. "And if Higuita could play his normal, natural game, then the others had to follow his example. And we started playing our football."
I still can't decide here. I feel like Julinho is going to have much joy on that flank especially since Junior is the 30+ year old vintage so slower and less athletic. But at the same time I am not at all convinced Zabaleta can handle Joya especially with Valderrama (not known to be industrious) on that side .
A game with many 3-4 goals
I still can't decide here. I feel like Julinho is going to have much joy on that flank especially since Junior is the 30+ year old vintage so slower and less athletic. But at the same time I am not at all convinced Zabaleta can handle Joya especially with Valderrama (not known to be industrious) on that side .
Agreed but I'll score more due to a better defence and greater creativity.
I feel like Julinho is going to have much joy on that flank especially since Junior is the 30+ year old vintage so slower and less athletic.
I actually disagree there. One of the first things I thought when I looked at the team sheets was Physio's right flank doesn't quite have enough 'oomph' about it when you consider they are up against a defensively minded Pavoni with Junior helping out. I don't see Zabaleta supporting Julinho too much either bearing in mind his defensive requirements. I do like Physio's midfield very much though, Valderrama and Simeone are great partners for Cubillas and not too dissimilar from Velasquez/Cueto/Cubillas IMO.
Also like Physio's left side up against Forlan, even with Rattin helping out there could be some danger there. Likewise Skizzo/Pats left side against Zabaleta. It's bloody tough to decide really, will need to read through the thread one more time I think
I actually disagree there. One of the first things I thought when I looked at the team sheets was Physio's right flank doesn't quite have enough 'oomph' about it when you consider they are up against a defensively minded Pavoni with Junior helping out. I don't see Zabaleta supporting Julinho too much either bearing in mind his defensive requirements. I do like Physio's midfield very much though, Valderrama and Simeone are great partners for Cubillas and not too dissimilar from Velasquez/Cueto/Cubillas IMO.
Also like Physio's left side up against Forlan, even with Rattin helping out there could be some danger there. Likewise Skizzo/Pats left side against Zabaleta. It's bloody tough to decide really, will need to read through the thread one more time I think
I'm not sure it would change something.
I've read this thread many times and always change my mind
I'm not sure it would change something.
I've read this thread many times and always change my mind
Junior/Joya link which would be deveastating. I think they'd definitely have the upper hand against Zabaleta/Delgado and should be a good route to goal.
Im confused because I can't decide so I think draw. But then I see votes and think I should vote to make it draw because I can't decide. Then I think I am overthinking things and its a bit unfair to vote just to make it a draw as thats too meta. So I think Ill just abstain here and take some herbal medicine.
You shouldn't do that though. If you think that it's a draw, abstain from voting - but by doing what you did you've nullified someone's actual vote.The same. That is why I voted for Pat/Skizzo in order to get penalties
You shouldn't do that though. If you think that it's a draw, abstain from voting - but by doing what you did you're nullifying someone's actual vote.
Agreed. Draw is a draw. If you think one of the teams would get the edge then makes sense to vote, voting for a draw is doing exactly the opposite.You shouldn't do that though. If you think that it's a draw, abstain from voting - but by doing what you did you've nullified someone's actual vote.
Yep. There needs to be a way to get this bug out of the way in future games. @Chesterlestreet we need to brainstorm!You shouldn't do that though. If you think that it's a draw, abstain from voting - but by doing what you did you've nullified someone's actual vote.
Volunteers for pens duty (doing the whole routine) may sign up here.
If nobody wants the gig, there won't be a show – I'll just post the overall result.
Well it has already been suggested couple of time to vote without seeing the actual result. I think this is the best way to escape a voting for a draw situation.Yep. There needs to be a way to get this bug out of the way in future games. @Chesterlestreet we need to brainstorm!
Since that cursed day I put forward the idea of penalties instead of a commonly agreed voter deciding the tie this problem has plagued the drafts. It was okay at the start when people were excited to watch these 'penalties' but it's just a chore now. In fact we probably need a new way to decided ties now, but one thing at a time.
Yeah I'll have a crack if nobody else wants to (assuming the game does end in a draw).
Yep. There needs to be a way to get this bug out of the way in future games. @Chesterlestreet we need to brainstorm!
Since that cursed day I put forward the idea of penalties instead of a commonly agreed voter deciding the tie this problem has plagued the drafts. It was okay at the start when people were excited to watch these 'penalties' but it's just a chore now. In fact we probably need a new way to decided ties now, but one thing at a time.
Yeah that is a discussion for another day. I am fine with the penalties as long as people don't actively vote only to take a game to the penalties, which happens a lot.I understand the problems it can cause and why some don't like it, but personally I prefer the penalties system to one random person coming in and deciding the tie after voting has finished. The latter seems too much like the golden goal rule which I always hated.
Sent. I assume when I say the keeper dives right and the opponent hits it right it would be saved? Jayvin doesn't have to reverse the directions.
That's how I used to do them.Ooh good point. I was thinking the opposite. e.g. you shoot left, and Skizzo/Pat dive right then it's a save.
That's how I used to do them.
Keeper dives to HIS left/right.
Player shoots to HIS left/right.
So e.g. Shoot Left & Dive Right = Save.
Ooh good point. I was thinking the opposite. e.g. you shoot left, and Skizzo/Pat dive right then it's a save.
Clarification would be good @Chesterlestreet