Leonard17
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 394
People just don't understand how annoying City is. Their scouts were at our matches at every level. Even in some of our away games so we just can't stop them. It's pretty predictable who they will approach as well, basically they were into the ears of every parent on the best players in the U9s-U12s age group or even those U7s-U8s who technically were too young to "sign" for the club and could train/play for everyone. At those age the compensation fee is low and kids only sign one year deal. Not just with us though they regularly poached the best talents of the academies around the area (Liverpool,Blackburn,...). Anyone really think we wanted to boycott playing against them just because we lost some matches? We were fecking terrible in the Marveld Cup in the last few years and we never missed a year.
I have no insider info on this (well I'm not that "obsessed" about City's academy, just our of pure curiosity) but looking at their "team" in those U14s-U16s level it seems that they're trying to build a "team" already at that level with a quite balanced "XI" (I saw a teamsheet of them in the U15s cup and it's a very good side but what strikes me is they have almost nobody playing out of position at all). You can see their U18s first year intake this year. They have 1 goalkeeper, 4 defenders, 2-3 midfielders, 3-4 AM/wingers and 1-2 strikers. What does it look to you? Not a criticism but it's a huge difference in their approach compared to us and no wonder they won a lot of tournaments at those lower age groups, I mean it's not a rocket science looking at those facts.
So you think they're targeting specific players or have stopped their aggressive recruitment?