spiriticon
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 7,674
It's Andy Murray's time
It's amazing, isn't it?Back to tennis, I think we're finally going to get some new winners in the Australian open now that Novak is out and Nadal is out of form.
The last winner not from the big 3 was Wawrinka in 2014 and before that was Safin in 2015.
The big 3 dominance in men's tennis is borderline ridiculous.
Be brilliant to see Nadal have one more big year, is he on 20 slams too right? Or is be one behind?Tsitsipas seems like the new 'nearly' guy. Zverev capitulates in big GS matches and for Medvedev, his greatest enemy is his own mind. Karatsev has a good game, but I don't think it's enough to win.
Nadal's hard draw is actually a good thing. He can look at playing himself into form. It's the big servers that will be difficult for him, and usually who he loses to. But I hope he can pull it through. The win earlier will help immensely.
Rafa, even if he were in form, would have had a difficult time. This time, given he's been woeful all of last year and also short of proper match sharpness, is going to really struggle imo. He's got Kokkinakis in Round 2 who is in great form right now. That is followed by Karatsev or Khachanov in R3, Hurkacz or Shapovalov (who always gives Rafa a tough match) in R4 and then Zverev in the QF. If anything, his semi will probably be his easiest match after R1 with the withdrawal of Novak. I'd love to be proven wrong but I don't see Rafa making it to the second week also. If he does make it to the semis though, then I'd back him to beat Medvedev in the finals.Yeah, by no means will this be an easy ride for Nadal. Just thinking that, when you consider who's missing the AO, he couldn't ask for a better chance to leapfrog Federer and Djokovic.
As well as the two you mentioned, there's Tsitsipas and I agree with @Berbasbullet above - Karatsev looked very impressive yesterday. Monfils is apparently in good form, too, which I love to see.
All three of them are on 20. Nadal should be favorite at RG and might just beat Novak to 21.Be brilliant to see Nadal have one more big year, is he on 20 slams too right? Or is be one behind?
This is such a stupid post.A lot of bitter people here.
Australia have been hilariously bad here and should be embarrassed.
Most of us have probably had our last vaccine now anyway, so we're months away from being at the same level of immunity as the unvaccinated, yet we treat them like neo nazis... I think it's pretty blooming odd. But hey, whatever makes you happy.
A lot of bitter people here.
Australia have been hilariously bad here and should be embarrassed.
Most of us have probably had our last vaccine now anyway, so we're months away from being at the same level of immunity as the unvaccinated, yet we treat them like neo nazis... I think it's pretty blooming odd. But hey, whatever makes you happy.
I'm puzzled.
Honesty, I'm obviously apart from mainstream views on the topic. People are offended because there's a person somewhere on the planet who doesn't want a vaccine (like around 10-15% of people on this forum), has some weird world views (so what) and was (apparently wrongly) given exemption by an incompetent government to play a tennis tournament.
I really don't get it. Boris is being bumped for a soap opera that people are actually taking seriously
I agree. Especially given now that it's well established that the vaccines do not protect much against Omicron, what is the point of mandating vaccines(which I am against regardless) especially for professional athletes? The baseline population risk due to such high community transmission is so high with Omicron that vaccinated vs unvaccinated in this context for incoming travelers is meaningless.
The risk calculus for vaccines for professional players is not being considered either where there are reports of myocarditis -- I'd be curious to know what the implication of that is for a professional athlete aged 20-35 vs getting COVID for supremely fit people.
Djokovic has been stupid and I think they're entitled to not allow him to play - it's their tournament.. but the whole thing has been a circus and Australia have somehow managed to look worse than a guy who claims he found out about gluten intolerance by placing bread on his stomach.
You’re trying too hard now.I'm puzzled.
Honesty, I'm obviously apart from mainstream views on the topic. People are offended because there's a person somewhere on the planet who doesn't want a vaccine (like around 10-15% of people on this forum), has some weird world views (so what) and was (apparently wrongly) given exemption by an incompetent government to play a tennis tournament.
I really don't get it. Boris is being bumped for a soap opera that people are actually taking seriously
I'm puzzled.
Personally I'm on tenterhooks, eagerly anticipating how the poster can once again write the same post, worded differently, without addressing any of the replies or points raised to him/her.You’re trying too hard now.
Good point.Personally I'm on tenterhooks, eagerly anticipating how the poster can once again write the same post, worded differently, without addressing any of the replies or points raised to him/her.
Believe Karstsev is a potential R4 opponent and Shapo in the QFs instead.Rafa, even if he were in form, would have had a difficult time. This time, given he's been woeful all of last year and also short of proper match sharpness, is going to really struggle imo. He's got Kokkinakis in Round 2 who is in great form right now. That is followed by Karatsev or Khachanov in R3, Hurkacz or Shapovalov (who always gives Rafa a tough match) in R4 and then Zverev in the QF. If anything, his semi will probably be his easiest match after R1 with the withdrawal of Novak. I'd love to be proven wrong but I don't see Rafa making it to the second week also. If he does make it to the semis though, then I'd back him to beat Medvedev in the finals.
Firstly the idea that vaccines don’t work vs omicron is just flat out wrong. So better to get educated in that to start with.
Having said that, if he doesn’t want to take it that’s his choice. I don’t have an issue with that. Do I disagree? Yes. But does it really bother me? No.
Which brings me to my second point. Who has mandated he has a vaccine? No one. So that’s a plainly false point you make. No one has said he must be vaccinated to play. Indeed it appears the tennis authorities were fine with it. However, that’s different for rules to enter a country. Novak has a choice. So does Australia about which foreign citizens they let in.
What you’re failing to understand is people aren’t particularly annoyed about his vaccine status on its own. It’s the way he has behaved and his actions over the last month or so.
You’re either purposely being obtuse, or you’re just a bit dim and/or unable to read. Quite clear that people don’t SOLELY hate him for being anti - vax. Didn’t see anyone say anything much about his vaccination status before this saga occurred.
It’s when you add in how he has behaved, tried to bend rules, either faked and infection or actually had it and knowingly put lives at risk. Sure plenty of people don’t like or understand those against the vaccine. But let’s not pretend that’s the only reason why Novak has garnered some hate here.
All of this is crystal clear in many posts over the last few pages alone. So I ask again, are you being obtuse? Or are you just writing idiotic posts? Either way, that’s what is really puzzling.
But I wasn’t debating your opinion. I was just challenging you on your view that you can’t understand why people are upset. My view on the nature of your post stems from the fact that since your first post, you had several people explain why (and in particular why it isn’t just about being anti-vax. When you then repeated your initial bemusement, with the notion that people are upset because he wasn’t vaccinated, I felt right to challenge you on it because it seems to me you ignored all those posts. If after reading those posts you’re still puzzled - sure, that’s your choice. But still keen to understand why you can’t understand why people might be upset with someone who either faked having covid or had it and put others at risk. You might disagree with being worked up about it - that would be your opinion and we could agree to disagree. But being puzzled about why those who disagree with you to do so? Hmm.Just a different point of view, not hard to understand.
I'm not getting my knickers in a twist about a Serbian tennis player and an incompetent government. It's pretty clear. And from my point of view on that, I don't get you. Much like you don't get me. Which is fine.
Best to remember that your opinion on the matter isn't the "correct" opinion though... Or perhaps not you specifically, but whoever it is on here who acts like someone has walked into their living room and taken a shit whenever anyone thinks differently.
You suggested vaccines don’t protect much VS Omicron. Which, sorry, is wrong. They are very effective against illness and, at least in the short term, in transmission too. Now, I understand your argument that if transmission is high, the risk of someone travelling in with it is somewhat irrelevant. I agree with that.On vaccines vs omicron from the NHS:
https://ibb.co/p3FXPxx
Feel free to educate me. EDIT: I left the word 'symptomatic infection' out in my original post out I see.
Second point - the Australian government has mandated vaccines for entry and that is also part of what I wrote my post against re baseline risk vs risk of someone new coming in, in context of omicron.
Third point - there are no laws against 'behaviour' and 'actions', otherwise a lot of professional sports persons wouldn't be playing. Feel free to be annoyed - that is not what my post is about.
For Nadal to win it the 2nd time would be great but I don't see it. Medvedev and Zverev are too strong right now.
However, Nadals big hope should be that French Open will require vaccination as well, which would give him an excellent shot at winning there.
Tsitsipas had an elbow injury at the back end of the year and had surgery prior to the tournament. He only played on full match in the ATP Cup which he lost to Schwartzman.Bookies suggest this is a bigger big 3 than the big 3/4 ever were....
the drop off in odds after Nadal is massive. What's up with Tsitsipas for him to be such an outsider odds wise?
Everything else forgotten, at a very basic level he’s just a monumental twat.
I agree. Especially given now that it's well established that the vaccines do not protect much against Omicron, what is the point of mandating vaccines(which I am against regardless) especially for professional athletes? The baseline population risk due to such high community transmission is so high with Omicron that vaccinated vs unvaccinated in this context for incoming travelers is meaningless.
The risk calculus for vaccines for professional players is not being considered either where there are reports of myocarditis -- I'd be curious to know what the implication of that is for a professional athlete aged 20-35 vs getting COVID for supremely fit people.
Djokovic has been stupid and I think they're entitled to not allow him to play - it's their tournament.. but the whole thing has been a circus and Australia have somehow managed to look worse than a guy who claims he found out about gluten intolerance by placing bread on his stomach.
Everything else forgotten, at a very basic level he’s just a monumental twat.
He's improved since the Olympics I reckon. I think even the odds makers have him second favorite behind Medvedev.Despite the fact that he tries to serve donkeys instead of tennis balls in big matches?
The lad that beat Murray the other day has a great chance I reckon, a semi finalist last year as well I hear? Hit the ball very nicely on the surface and defended well too.
Calm down you imbecile. It was a typo I corrected in a later post.Well established? Sorry but what the feck are you on about? Educate yourself before going around posting stupidity.
Now that really would be something!It's Andy Murray's time