wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 38,891
That's your real GOAT. Congratulations to Novak.
Seemed inevitable the minute Tsitsipas won the second set. You know whats comingSeemed so inevitable once he went up in that third set.
YESSSSS djokoooooo. Electrified.Yaaaaawn. Bring on grass.
Raging hahaYaaaaawn. Bring on grass.
He's bottling it.
He’s the best tennis player ever. Just needs to pass 20 grand slams to confirm it at this point.
Tsitsipas will win one eventually, he was incredible in the first two sets
Yaaaaawn. Bring on grass.
I think it was that Djokovic wasn't in it. Tsitsipas needs some work on his game - his shots don't look penetrating enough. To beat these guys in the slams you need to be able to hit winner after winner, against the angles knowing full well that Djokovic will manage to get it back in. Because as soon as Djokovic takes control of the rally, its pretty much over.
Its why Thiem has come the closest (and has a slam to his name for it)
Its why Thiem has come the closest (and has a slam to his name for it)
Injuries and he's also admitted he's struggled mentally since winning the US Open. Easy to see it as a springboard but quite often it doesn't work like that.Yeah what's happened to him? I love watching him play, the power he has and his 1h backhand. After he won the slam I thought it would be a springboard to bigger things but instead he's fallen off a cliff.
Yup can't wait for the surface where bang average players can rain down aces, have nothing in their game and still do relatively well. Can't wait!Sums up my feelings too, but given that grass can be effectively green clay nowadays, there's a decent chance it'll be more of the same non stop grinding.
He lost all motivation. Which just highlights the difference between the Big 3 and the rest. Winning 20 Slams and still have the motivation to win deep in their 30s.Yeah what's happened to him? I love watching him play, the power he has and his 1h backhand. After he won the slam I thought it would be a springboard to bigger things but instead he's fallen off a cliff.
I really don't think he even needs to 20+ Slams (even though he'll easily surpass it by January) to be confirmed as the GOAT. He already owns every important record there is.He’s the best tennis player ever. Just needs to pass 20 grand slams to confirm it at this point.
Tsitsipas will win one eventually, he was incredible in the first two sets
Or he will win after the Holy Trinity has retired.
Is it really, though? Djoko is a firm favorite with Federer probably right below and then Nadal. Everyone else in the Top 10 is rubbish on the surface.Congrats to Novk.
Congrats to Stefanos. He acquitted himself very well on his first Grand Slam final. There will be many more finals for him and at least a few wins.
Will be a very interesting Wimbledon.
The guy has a 8-7 career record on grass and has never gone past R4 at Wimbledon. Last time he was there, he lost in R1 to some random Italian. The guy, much like all of the Next Gen, is awful on grass.Great tournament. Some absolute cracking matches with that Nadal Nole 3rd set probably my highlight. Also great that Wimbledon is not too far away, hope we get to see Federer go deep. Wouldn't be surprised if Tsisipas is in the final of that tournament too. Then you got Zverev, Medvedev,Rublev, Musetti,Sinner all capable of beating anyone on their day. Hope Nadal doesn't withdraw.
You might be right but lets wait and see. I like the tennis games of all the guys I mentioned. If they serve well that week they have a chance I reckon. I also think this French open actually takes a toll on Djokovic mentally, I don't think he does the calender slam. He would be my pick to win the US open though.The guy has a 8-7 career record on grass and has never gone past R4 at Wimbledon. Last time he was there, he lost in R1 to some random Italian. The guy, much like all of the Next Gen, is awful on grass.
Here we go again. I'd take that over bang average players moonballing and grinding their way to success on dirt.Yup can't wait for the surface where bang average players can rain down aces, have nothing in their game and still do relatively well. Can't wait!
This may be true but just the complete lack of competition on grass means he's only going to need to step it up in one match vs Federer.You might be right but lets wait and see. I like the tennis games of all the guys I mentioned. If they serve well that week they have a chance I reckon. I also think this French open actually takes a toll on Djokovic mentally, I don't think he does the calender slam. He would be my pick to win the US open though.
What bang average players moon ball their way to success though? It's a really difficult Slam to win. Just ask Federer.Here we go again. I'd take that over bang average players moonballing and grinding their way to success on dirt.
Hyperbole aside, if you've ever played tennis, you'd know that grass requires serious skill. And it's a shame that the grass court season is non existent.
Here we go again. I'd take that over bang average players moonballing and grinding their way to success on dirt.
Hyperbole aside, if you've ever played tennis, you'd know that grass requires serious skill. And it's a shame that the grass court season is non existent.
Grass has long moved away from big serve and volley over the last 20 years. Being that Wimbledon is still the only slam on the surface, the skill is being able to adapt to a fast surface that deteriorates over the tournament.What bang average players moon ball their way to success though? It's a really difficult Slam to win. Just ask Federer.
Anyway, I don't believe you require lesser skill to play on grass but the whole big serve +1 shot to finish points really quickly? I find that a lot more boring than actually watching point construction and long rallies on clay and even hards.
Look at the list of French open winners pre Rafa. Plenty of players there who struggled on faster surfaces.What bang average players moon ball their way to success though? It's a really difficult Slam to win. Just ask Federer.
Anyway, I don't believe you require lesser skill to play on grass but the whole big serve +1 shot to finish points really quickly? I find that a lot more boring than actually watching point construction and long rallies on clay and even hards.
I do feel that a lot of players can beat the best on grass. It explains why we’ve had major upsets from lower ranked players over the years.This may be true but just the complete lack of competition on grass means he's only going to need to step it up in one match vs Federer.
The 08 final was the greatest match ever. It was akin to the Ali/ Frazier Thriller in Manila. I’m not sure Rafa ever recovered. I don’t think he’s won Wimbledon since has he?Look at the list of French open winners pre Rafa. Plenty of players there who struggled on faster surfaces.
Wimbledon has barely been like that in years now. With the slowing grass, better rackets and fitter players, it plays like a faster indoor court where you can have plenty of point construction along with net play. It's the greater variety of points which I enjoy. It's also why I feel the 08 Wimbledon final remains the greatest match in the modern era - the surface played a part.
It's a bit bizarre how you guys can't accept that people might not enjoy watching Djokovic.
It reminds me a bit of the Chelsea fans on here defending their most recent title winning team under Jose, and why it was actually really attacking football and everyone who thought otherwise was wrong, blind, stupid, biased, etc.
The thing everybody forgets when having this debate, usually due to being partisan, is that style, greatness, and entertainment factor is subjective, and not everybody enjoys the same thing.
Nadal won it in 2010, beating Berdych in the final.The 08 final was the greatest match ever. It was akin to the Ali/ Frazier Thriller in Manila. I’m not sure Rafa ever recovered. I don’t think he’s won Wimbledon since has he?
The 08 final was the greatest match ever. It was akin to the Ali/ Frazier Thriller in Manila. I’m not sure Rafa ever recovered. I don’t think he’s won Wimbledon since has he?
Yes it is quite funny when people say that considering Nole's matches are always exciting.it is moronic to find Djokovic not aesthetically pleasing, the shot making he has in his Arsenal is second to none. People acting like he’s the Atletico madrid of tennis are laughable.
Ok , was that against a much lower ranked player? I can’t for the life of me remember itWon it in 2010.
It’s subjective surely. What’s your definition of aesthetically pleasing in sport/ art/ dance?Yes it is quite funny when people say that considering Nole's matches are always exciting.
Yeah Berdych, though at the time he was pretty good. Believe he beat both Federer and Djokovic to make the final, with Nadal beating Murray in the SF.Ok , was that against a much lower ranked player? I can’t for the life of me remember it