Physiocrat
Has No Mates
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 9,569
TBF i didnt criticize Enrique, think he is a brilliant well-rounded player that can play across the whole offensive line. I rate him as the second/third best offensive(strikers included) player at the pitch behind Zidane as i cant decide between him and Rui Costa.
Just dont think in this scenario he wouldnt be used to best of his abilities....as i said earlier, a very tight game(very small advantage pnut) that will be decided with injuries.
Could you please take the tactical changes and post at 2130? I don't think I'll be able to do it until 2230.
The changes are sent to me, Sjor and GSCan whoever is doing the changes drop me a message please
One for each team.@harms,
how are two players injured at the same time? I thought one will be injured at the 8th hour mark and the other at 16th?
speedy harmsito
As i thought, injuries changed a lot! All my comments about Enrique now go down the drain and he turns from a passenger to a game changer with Arce providing the width so he can play his natural role. Of course that means the problem just switches sides but Lucho is a bigger game changer then Forlan, he is against much weaker opponent then Forlan was + Zidane likes to drift on the left so that helps a little bit, but literally a little.
Pnut got fecked, i liked Carrick behind Keano and Vieira because he "allowed" the team to have proper wingers in the team, without that safety net you have to account their defensive game and Ginola certainly doesnt fit the bill and IIRC nor does Super Mario even though i might be wrong on that one. Pnut was winning because of his defensive unit and now he lost that, yes he upped the offensive side but it probably wont be enough + he is out of subs now so one more injurie and he is playing with 10 men(thats irrelevant for now though)?
I see, so we're definitely losing 2 players at every game one at 8th hour and one at 16th hour mark.One for each team.
P-Nut made a sub because he had to drop Carrick due to the Carragher substitutuion
I see, so we're definitely losing 2 players at every game one at 8th hour and one at 16th hour mark.
aye, must've misread it myself.I thought the same as you. The way it was labelled as each team should lose 1/2 a player each game meant that there was 1 injury per 8 hour slot with a 50% chance of it being your team in each.
Ah right. Can you send the 8 hour injuries please as I'll be asleep when they are done.The probability is for 1/4 of an injury per team per randomisation. It just so happened that two players were injured from both teams were injured at once. So on average we should just have 1 per game (0.5 per team).
Ah right. Can you send the 8 hour injuries please as I'll be asleep when they are done.
Just done
Well I guess I am obliged to tell you that Carrick got subbed out after 30 minutes, if that makes any difference for you.Carrick, Keane, Vieira. That actually works as far as I can tell, and easily dominates an opposition midfield which has Ince in it.
Carrick, Keane, Vieira. That actually works as far as I can tell, and easily dominates an opposition midfield which has Ince in it.
Weakens his midfield a bit, but overall I'd still back that team to dominate the ball. Vieira and Keane is still a solid pairing.Well I guess I am obliged to tell you that Carrick got subbed out after 30 minutes, if that makes any difference for you.
Schweiny - Ince too. Not quite as good but I actually think that they'll dovetail betterWeakens his midfield a bit, but overall I'd still back that team to dominate the ball. Vieira and Keane is still a solid pairing.
Maybe, but it would depend a lot on how well Ince is allowed to play, imo. With Vieira and Keane about, I'm not sure he'll be seeing much of the ball. He won't be able to impose himself much on the game here, and I think Vieira and Keane are both a level above Schweinsteiger. That will be blasphemy to many people in the draft crowd, but both impressed me more than Schweinsteiger during their careers.Schweiny - Ince too. Not quite as good but I actually think that they'll dovetail better
Not sure it is an injustice. I mean Keane (almost single handed) dominated a midfield that was comprised of Deschamps, Zidane and Davids. Pair him with a peak Vieira, and I think that domination is only furthered.I think it is a bit of an injustice to Ince and Schweinsteiger to say they won't even compete. Neither would shy away from the challenge at all, and they'd make it a game for sure.
Not sure it is an injustice. I mean Keane (almost single handed) dominated a midfield that was comprised of Deschamps, Zidane and Davids. Pair him with a peak Vieira, and I think that domination is only furthered.
Not sure it is an injustice. I mean Keane (almost single handed) dominated a midfield that was comprised of Deschamps, Zidane and Davids. Pair him with a peak Vieira, and I think that domination is only furthered.
I really don't think I am. I've watched that game about twenty times, and Butt put in an excellent shift, but Keane was all over the pitch -- he was the decisive player. But even if we concede that Butt played an important ancillary role, just imagine how much better Vieira at his peak does.Keano is one of my favorite players but feck me you are overblowing the facts. Keane was fantastic in that game but so was his midfield partner Nicky Butt and the whole team played really well.
I really don't think I am. I've watched that game about twenty times, and Butt put in an excellent shift, but Keane was all over the pitch -- he was the decisive player. But even if we concede that Butt played an important ancillary role, just imagine how much better Vieira at his peak does.
Exactly, I think there's a reluctance to imagine them working well together due to their hatred for each other but they put it aside in the best of enemies documentary so they can do it on the field.
That duo is all time level, both at their peak there isn't too many number 10s I see having any joy against them.
I agree, Butt had a great game. One of the most under appreciated players we've ever had. Still, Keane was a level above (not just Butt, but a level above every player on the pitch that night). Keane was made for the big games.Well, i dont disagree that Keane was the best player on the pitch nor that he didnt play a great game im just saying he didnt do it single handed, not even close because the others played very good as well, specially Nicky Butt.
Anyway here are two examples Lucho scoring from right side, and there are countless examples of him working both the outside and inside right channels -
Vieira led Arsenal through an unbeaten league campaign, won a World Cup and European Championship with France. If Schweinsteiger is better than Vieira, it's very marginal. I'd still go for Vieira over Schweinsteiger, though.Schweinsteiger is getting incredibly under rated here. He is right up there with Keane and is a better midfielder than Vieira. A key player in a Treble win for Bayern and was Germany's talisman in a world cup win. Ince I agree that is not as complete as either Keane and Vieira, since they are better dribblers and passers but in a purely defensive sense he is also very good and probably fits better.
I don't think they'll struggle with Zidane, who is obviously better than his counterpart in Costa. I just think Costa will have more of an impact here because Keane and Vieira will provide him with a far better platform, and Zizu was quite often a passenger in games. True, his moments of brilliance could often win matches, but I think he could be stifled and frustrated here.Keane and Vieira are better but they are also facing much tougher opposition in Zidane, who is a superior player than Costa. There is no way my midfield could be considered a weakness in any way. I also have a superior defense and a batter overall attack.
They might lose another player if the randomiser draws out numbers assigned to their players. If not, then the teams would not get any injuries.Still abit confused about how injury system works tbh. Are both teams going to lose yet another player or is that it now.