matic huh... why would they need another mid
But we just signed someone 6 years old that him
He's a very good goal scorer but that's all. Goes missing when the going gets tough which was the case for Newcastle for most part of last season. That's why they didn't like him even though he scored around 10 goals I think.Newcastle fans think he's not very consistent, like Sissoko. So on their judgement, this would be a bad signing for them.
Perfect for almost every side, really.He'd be perfect for us.
So they have moved away from Stones?
But that's what the report says "release clause of 34m". Also, They aren't compulsory like in Spain, but its not like there aren't release clausesThere are no release clauses in France.
But that's what the report says "release clause of 34m". Also, They aren't compulsory like in France, but its not like there aren't release clauses
Technically different, but at the end in case of buyout, the club does pay the player to pay buyout his contract, so the flow of money is the same with an additional step, if I'm not mistaken. And the report says release clause, which is what I was pointing outBuyout clause is not the same as release clause
whose main attributes are not based on energy or speed
He's a very good goal scorer but that's all. Goes missing when the going gets tough which was the case for Newcastle for most part of last season. That's why they didn't like him even though he scored around 10 goals I think.
I bet the supplements testers were out in force that day.plus 4 were in one game.
I bet the supplements testers were out in force that day.
No idea why you would want that. Matuidi is the better player and far less chance of him spending the entire season injured.Would much rather keen Bastien than bring in Matuidi.
No idea why you would want that. Matuidi is the better player and far less chance of him spending the entire season injured.
He'd fly over to Germany to do itzero chance of passing that medical