kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
New referees should have been hired for VAR. Fools will be fools
I get the anger over referees. As a supporter and a fornmer player, I used to get so wound up with referees who were, in my words 'shit'.
The criticism is never going to go away but until I started reffing, I had no idea just how tough it is. Something on the TV that looks so obvious can be missed by the ref for various reasons. I was doing a game towards the end of last season and missed (after watching it back) a blatant red card tackle. I actually gave the free kick the other way. Why? I was too close. I was less than a yard away and the ball was loose with 2 players coming into challenge for it. One player got the ball, the other hit the man but came worse off and in the split second with the almost blurred view I had, I was convinced that the player who actually won the ball, had caught the man instead.
The benches went mad as you can imagine and looking back, I was angry with myself for not being better positioned but actually I was perfectly positioned for where the ball was no more than 2 seconds earlier.
A referee like a player can get caught out and miss things that seem obvious. It still winds me up as a fan but I sympathise with referees at the top level where millions see a mistake each and every week
And VAR too....Yea, but they have 3 assistants now and they get paid the big bucks. You didn't.
I had two assistants, the one closest to the tackle was blinded by a player running in front of them and the other was too far away to be credible and as for money, it doesn't matter how much you get paid, sometimes as a human, you miss things.Yea, but they have 3 assistants now and they get paid the big bucks. You didn't.
Nor it should. But it is there specifically to step in for stuff like the martial penalty. That was such a clear and obvious mistake, it's unacceptable that they got it wrongVAR is there to help, but they don't step in for every single issue
I agree with that and I'm not sure why they didn't.Nor it should. But it is there specifically to step in for stuff like the martial penalty. That was such a clear and obvious mistake, it's unacceptable that they got it wrong
Because he plays for Palace.Wasn't the player who fouled Mctominay for the penalty on a yellow with a few fouls before that all game?
Why didn't he get sent off?
Yes, because they weren't suspicious, they were flat out objectively wrong and terrible.Would it be a stretch to suggest some of the refereeing decisions today were borderline suspicious?
Would it be a stretch to suggest some of the refereeing decisions today were borderline suspicious?
Cahil escaping a red, Martial penalty incident, James receiving a yellow for simulation were all incorrect decisions that should have been overturned by VAR, so why weren't they.
With the inclusion of VAR in the game now, refs have nowhere to hide when it comes to making decisions that affect the outcome of the game. Why aren't they being held accountable for their actions?
Would it be a stretch to suggest some of the refereeing decisions today were borderline suspicious?
Cahil escaping a red, Martial penalty incident, James receiving a yellow for simulation were all incorrect decisions that should have been overturned by VAR, so why weren't they.
With the inclusion of VAR in the game now, refs have nowhere to hide when it comes to making decisions that affect the outcome of the game. Why aren't they being held accountable for their actions?
Yes, because they weren't suspicious, they were flat out objectively wrong and terrible.
It definitely feels a lot more wrong. They had the technology to do the right thing and still chose to screw us over. What are we up against here?
I wouldn’t say suspicious as we wouldn’t have got a penalty on McTominay.
I do think some people have gone a bit overboard. The Cahill one would have been a very harsh red card, there was another defender right behind him.
The Martial foul was definitely a penalty and I can’t work out how VAR hasn’t given that one. Clear as day.
The Rashford one he was already going down when he got knocked.
As for the constant fouling by Palace I can’t comment as I didn’t watch the 90 minutes, courtesy of the stupid 3pm rule in this country.
I wouldn’t say suspicious as we wouldn’t have got a penalty on McTominay.
I do think some people have gone a bit overboard. The Cahill one would have been a very harsh red card, there was another defender right behind him.
The Martial foul was definitely a penalty and I can’t work out how VAR hasn’t given that one. Clear as day.
The Rashford one he was already going down when he got knocked.
As for the constant fouling by Palace I can’t comment as I didn’t watch the 90 minutes, courtesy of the stupid 3pm rule in this country.
My recollection of the incident was this, Martial turned Cahill inside out and left him for dead, leaving him clean through on goal, on his favoured left foot no less. That's a goal-scoring opportunity any way you slice it. I didn't see any other defender close to Martial.
Rashford's wasn't a penalty, I agree.
I watched the entire game and can say, without any shadow of a doubt, that the Palace players were fouling non-stop. James was getting kicked all over the park.
Would it be a stretch to suggest some of the refereeing decisions today were borderline suspicious?
Cahil escaping a red, Martial penalty incident, James receiving a yellow for simulation were all incorrect decisions that should have been overturned by VAR, so why weren't they.
With the inclusion of VAR in the game now, refs have nowhere to hide when it comes to making decisions that affect the outcome of the game. Why aren't they being held accountable for their actions?
The FA rules state:It definitely feels a lot more wrong. They had the technology to do the right thing and still chose to screw us over. What are we up against here?
Relevant explanations from the FA:SENDING-OFF OFFENCES
denying a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity to an opponent whose overall movement is towards the offender's goal by an offence punishable by a free kick
Q11: Can a DOGSO offence outside the penalty area be punished with a caution (YC)?
NO – unlike a penalty kick, a free kick is not an obvious chance to score a goal so it does not ‘restore’ the obvious goal-scoring opportunity that was denied by the offence - the disciplinary sanction for all DOGSO offences outside the penalty area remains a sending-off (RC).
: Is every DOGSO offence in the penalty now only a caution (YC)?
NO – the Law has only changed for those DOGSO offences in the penalty area where the offender makes an attempt to play the ball or challenge an opponent for the ball. The sending-off (RC) remains for: handball holding, pulling and pushing (as these offences are not an attempt to play the ball) making no attempt to play the ball e.g. a deliberate trip an offence when there was no chance/possibility of the ball being played
Exactly, behind him. He wasn't catching Martial or covering Cahill. If Cahill doesn't foul there, Martial gets a shot away.
Martial scored from the same position on Monday. Denying a clear goalscoring opportunity is a red card. I don't think it would have been harsh at all. If the role was reversed, I'd be lamenting how utterly stupid our centre back was to commit a foul like that.
James also got booked for getting kicked in the knee, possibly his worst decision.I wouldn’t say suspicious as we wouldn’t have got a penalty on McTominay.
I do think some people have gone a bit overboard. The Cahill one would have been a very harsh red card, there was another defender right behind him.
The Martial foul was definitely a penalty and I can’t work out how VAR hasn’t given that one. Clear as day.
The Rashford one he was already going down when he got knocked.
As for the constant fouling by Palace I can’t comment as I didn’t watch the 90 minutes, courtesy of the stupid 3pm rule in this country.
That's to be expected when the players realise they can get away with murder here. They are going to push the limit as much as they possibly can. These are cut-throat top professionals.I watched the entire game and can say, without any shadow of a doubt, that the Palace players were fouling non-stop. James was getting kicked all over the park.
Yep, loads of times we should have seen a card. When Martial was brought down by the last defender just outside the box. Definite yellow, if not a red. James got a yellow for diving when he didnt dive. What is VAR for?We were kicked all over the pitch today and it was absolutely shambolic.
My recollection of the incident was this, Martial turned Cahill inside out and left him for dead, leaving him clean through on goal, on his favoured left foot no less. That's a goal-scoring opportunity any way you slice it. I didn't see any other defender close to Martial.
Rashford's wasn't a penalty, I agree.
I watched the entire game and can say, without any shadow of a doubt, that the Palace players were fouling non-stop. James was getting kicked all over the park.
Unfortunately the rules have changed. Denying a clear goal scoring opportunity no longer warrants a certain red card.
https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36047575
Those include holding, pulling or pushing, not playing the ball, serious foul play, violent conduct or deliberate handball in order to deny a goalscoring opportunity.