1. I specified awards, not world titles. So that's that entire first paragraph reduced to nothing more than an insulting sentence. If you had changed it to Schumi winning German Sportsman of the Year then you'd have a point. However I think that him winning the world title repeatedly over such a long period means
he did deserve to be honoured with a few awards, despite his tax exile status.
So you've changed your own rule in the blink of an eye.
2. You've just disproved your own point. Hamilton is entirely reliant on his own, massively advantageous, car for his success. Yes, he needs to maintain incredible levels of physical fitness, adhere to a strict diet and personal fitness regime and is the product of an extensive team of workers - but this is no different to every other nominee, all of whom need to follow the demands of their chosen sport and have a lot to thank their personal groups of nutritionists, analysts, psychiatrists and coaches for. The point is that Hamilton has a huge advantage over all but one other of his competitors in his car. His achievement in winning the world F1 title is a lot less than, say, Charlotte Evans or Jo Pavey, who have won their titles on a much more level and even playing field. All the while without displaying the personality traits of a spoilt 7 year old girl and by overcoming greater personal obstacles than Hamilton. Let's not get stuck into the disadvantages these other athletes may face regarding funding, Governing Body support, training etc either.
And you missed the main point which was that Hamilton's skill as a driver/developer is a huge part of the car package.
3. I'll save you hearing any more of my rubbish by leaving this exchange here. Take comfort in the fact that the majority of the UK public are, like yourself, incredibly short-sighted and media-influenced when it comes to recognitions of sporting success.