Foxbatt
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2013
- Messages
- 14,297
Alright Souness, put your medals on the table and lets compare yours and Casemiro's
Alright Souness, put your medals on the table and lets compare yours and Casemiro's
Didn't he have a heart attack a while back? Maybe there was some brain damage too.
He did it. He really did it!
Harsh on @duffer
To be honest he seems to get skinned by the other two when he’s on. If you like watching him squirm then stick it on.
Has a pundit ever been “removed” for being so bad ?
Agbonlahor is a pundit! Make that of what you will!!!Has a pundit ever been “removed” for being so bad ?
A broken clock etcDid no one mention he also thought Ali Dia was good at football?
Best players have the highest football IQ with great technical abilities. Casemiro has great technical abilities with great IQ.I don't think he is that wrong about Casimero. Casimero have been very good and made our midfield more stabile. But he hasn't been worldbeater. He wasn't that in Real Madrid either and actually, that is not his role. He is there to give team balance and he has great football IQ. 7-7,5 of 10 every week? I'll have no problem to take that from a central (holding) midfielder. I think we need to ask us where line for good, very good and great goes.
When it comes to Martinez, I think he is wrong there. Martinez, with exception of game against Brentford, have been one of the top five signings in league so far. Brilliant.
Btw. Souness have great amount of medals. I don't think that should be talked about in this case.
I kind of agree with what you say. But we can’t say that he dominates games. Not that he needs to. He is good at what he does. He brings stability and as you say, he got high football IQ. I get what Souness want to say. And what he means. He is not negative at all against Casemiro. Neither am I. Casemiro is still learning PL game and how his teamates play.Best players have the highest football IQ with great technical abilities. Casemiro has great technical abilities with great IQ.
I don’t know which lines you are speaking about.
Everyone will say Messi is god compared to Casemiro and that’s kind of true as the most difficult job in football is to score goals and be a spectacular and efficient attacker, and no one was better than Messi for this job.
But Messi won’t be able to do the job Casemiro is doing. He won’t have the same presence, placement and defensive work. And that’s is a real skill requiring high IQ and technical abilities. Plus, he has very good passing abilities. He is a great player with high standards and has been the best at what he is doing for a long time.
Whilst I’m no fan of him at all, I don’t think age makes much difference in how good a pundit or coach you are in 2022 (if that was the case, fergie, wenger, ancelloti should have all retired in their 50s and given way to the likes of Rio etc).It seems hard to believe a guy who played 40 years ago and almost destroyed Liverpool as manager 30 years ago, may not have the sharpest views about 2022 football.
Don’t know what dominating games for a player means as it’s a team game and you dominate as a team when you press and pass well, suffocating the other team, playing your game while not letting the other team play.I kind of agree with what you say. But we can’t say that he dominates games. Not that he needs to. He is good at what he does. He brings stability and as you say, he got high football IQ. I get what Souness want to say. And what he means. He is not negative at all against Casemiro. Neither am I. Casemiro is still learning PL game and how his teamates play.
If you check what you have given him after his games, is he even above 7 -7,5 as Souness thinks he is every game? If you now give them rating points.
Can’t take this serious…he’s been fantastic. His positioning and 1/2 touch passing has transformed us.I don't think he is that wrong about Casimero. Casimero have been very good and made our midfield more stabile. But he hasn't been worldbeater. He wasn't that in Real Madrid either and actually, that is not his role. He is there to give team balance and he has great football IQ. 7-7,5 of 10 every week? I'll have no problem to take that from a central (holding) midfielder. I think we need to ask us where line for good, very good and great goes.
When it comes to Martinez, I think he is wrong there. Martinez, with exception of game against Brentford, have been one of the top five signings in league so far. Brilliant.
Btw. Souness have great amount of medals. I don't think that should be talked about in this case.
He actually said this? Why does he have anything against ETH? From a purely objective viewpoint, we're 3 points behind the third placed team and 1 behind the fourth placed team with a game in hand against both after having played all of the top 6 and Liverpool."No one will remember ETH as Manchester United manager five years from now"... This is the one that's going to come back to bite you in the arse, Graeme. Just like the other Scottish 'pool legend 27 years ago.
I was thinking this very thing. I'll take a midfielder that gives us 7-7.5 every game. When was the last time we had a player that did that? Probably Bruno when he first came. You'd have to go back to Fergie to find anyone else.How anyone is letting ‘He’s no world beater, he’s never a 9 or 10, he’s just a 7.5 in every game’ just slide away is mad.
8 talented players that are 7.5 in every game and you’ll win the league. It was literally Alex Ferguson ultimate compliment that he used for Denis Irwin.
He actually said this? Why does he have anything against ETH? From a purely objective viewpoint, we're 3 points behind the third placed team and 1 behind the fourth placed team with a game in hand against both after having played all of the top 6 and Liverpool.
Maybe it's not amazing but at the very least it's steady. To top it off, all his signings seem to have settled. Granted, it's early days and may look different come the end of the season but given the evidence at hand I don't see how you make such a statement without having some agenda against the man.
He did it. He really did it!
I was recently reading a relatively new Roberto Baggio's interview (the guy rarely speaks about football these days). He said something that is top notch about pundits.
«Non guardo le partite, non mi divertono quasi mai. Mi mette a disagio dare giudizi sugli altri, non vado in TV. Vedo colleghi che sentenziano da professori, ma me li ricordo incapaci di fare tre palleggi con le mani».
"I don't watch games anymore as I rarely enjoy them. I feel uneasy to pass judgement on others which is why I never go on TV. I've seen former colleagues that try to pass themselves as professors of football. Yet I do remember them playing and they weren't even capable of doing three 3 juggles even if they used their own hands instead"
Which really makes me wonder. Why on earth is football punditry is filled with absolute donkeys (technique wise) such as Carragher, the Neville brothers and Hargreaves? In Italy things seem to have improved with the introduction of Fabio Capello, Del Piero and Di Canio but it still gave space to absolute idiots like Adani
What grinds my gears further is how they try to make themselves look so professional these days with touchscreen tv, and drawing lines and showing easy plays as if they know better. When I was young, watching football was just that, you watch your games, and then go home. Now there are endless hours of shallow punditry with these old farts who know jackshit about analytics or tactics, having to pretend they are experts simply because they are paid to do so. Just takes the soul out of the game.
Good post.This is what happens in my opinion. The likes of Carra and Gaz had lived in the shadows of far more talented players such as Giggs, Scholes and Gerrard since their childhood. What comes easy for the likes of Giggs would sound incredibly difficult for the likes of Gaz. When its time to burst into first team football, the talented players tend to attract the fans (and women), they end up making more money, they are treated better by the club (its more difficult to replace Scholes then Gaz) and due to their talent they achieved all of that with a style of football that is often less taxing on their body. This reverence towards these players is often hardcoded in them as they know very well that if there's a spat between Gerrard and Carra to an extent that the club will have to choose one between them then that choice will be quite natural for them. This reverence survive to this day with Carra refusing to criticise Gerrard even though he's a shit manager and with our own players struggling to criticise Ronaldo's form.
Once these players retire they notice that fans tend to forget about them quite quickly. Not to forget that the new generation of players are making far more money then they do. Thus they end up in punditry pouring their sourness and making themselves look like the football geniuses that they never were.
You rarely see real top talented players who had attracted the love of fans being so sour as pundits (I am referring to the likes of Cantona, Baggio, Totti, Ronaldo (Brazilian) etc). For them football was a fabulous chapter in their life, they came in and out of it with their ego satisfied for the rest of their life.
I was recently reading a relatively new Roberto Baggio's interview (the guy rarely speaks about football these days). He said something that is top notch about pundits.
«Non guardo le partite, non mi divertono quasi mai. Mi mette a disagio dare giudizi sugli altri, non vado in TV. Vedo colleghi che sentenziano da professori, ma me li ricordo incapaci di fare tre palleggi con le mani».
"I don't watch games anymore as I rarely enjoy them. I feel uneasy to pass judgement on others which is why I never go on TV. I've seen former colleagues that try to pass themselves as professors of football. Yet I do remember them playing and they weren't even capable of doing three 3 juggles even if they used their own hands instead"
Which really makes me wonder. Why on earth is football punditry is filled with absolute donkeys (technique wise) such as Carragher, the Neville brothers and Hargreaves? In Italy things seem to have improved with the introduction of Fabio Capello, Del Piero and Di Canio but it still gave space to absolute idiots like Adani