Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 13,032
Peak CafeStruggling to get past this
Peak CafeStruggling to get past this
The keeper we bought looks woeful.?
What?!?
Surely this is bs? We're not that broke, right?
We really botched up in not selling Mctominay to West Ham for £30m. Would have given ample room to sign some players with regards to ffp.
FFP shoved a spanner right in the works. We can’t sell anybody, and city are getting 19m for a league 1 keeper, and 45m for a winger who hasn’t even scored in the premier league. Their FFP in its current state probably looks rosy!yeah we're fecked by FFP. Maguire refusing to leave really did us dirty. Also not being able to sell Donny. Years of overpaying and not selling anyone really killed us.
Dont quite understand, we got a decent fee for Henderson and his replacement is alot cheaper, Donny is going on loan.. did we already count those money?
It was on the MUFCMPBSource?
Dont quite understand, we got a decent fee for Henderson and his replacement is alot cheaper, Donny is going on loan.. did we already count those money?
It's all related and ties into the competence of how the club is run over time. Yes City skirted rules and cheated at the start. Probably understate wages though can't be proven. The last 5 years they've just gotten to a point where they don't need to do that though. They sell well. They scout well. They pull out at exorbitant costs. They sell players who aren't needed relative to their values. So they've always got the ffp room to do whatever they like now. It'll take time for that to turn around for us, but it starts with ruthlessly selling youth players the second they have value if you don't think they will become stars which we are doing tbf.FFP shoved a spanner right in the works. We can’t sell anybody, and city are getting 19m for a league 1 keeper, and 45m for a winger who hasn’t even scored in the premier league. Their FFP in its current state probably looks rosy!
100-120m net basically was our budget. We spent roughly 170m? Henderson is loan with buy obligation and not done yet, but overall I don't think we're at 50m or just about there once Henderson goes.Dont quite understand, we got a decent fee for Henderson and his replacement is alot cheaper, Donny is going on loan.. did we already count those money?
100-120m net basically was our budget. We spent roughly 170m? Henderson is loan with buy obligation and not done yet, but overall I don't think we're at 50m or just about there once Henderson goes.
We need people who can contribute now. I am interested in why people on here think we should spend on more unproven raw talents when we already have several very good kids who can’t get a game. It’s a romantic idea but the guys you mention are cheap because they are a risk and because nobody wants to pay to take that risk.In fairness, there's been a lot of money spent but its been spent very foolishly. That keeper we bought looks woeful and Cucurella has been thoroughly abject since leaving the Brighton eco-system. We make previous high performers like Sancho and Pogba looks awful so why would anyone think we can rehabilitate players that are downright terrible to start with.
We'll spend about ten million on the two short-term transfers/loans which serve no strategic purpose when we could sign Redondo for around that fee and someone like Valentin Barco seems to be available for 3.5 on transfermkt so double (or triple) that valuation and its still really cheap.
Not announced is it? Also haven't been looking today but yesterday they were saying it was a loan with a buy obligation and wasn't buy right away, did that change? Because if not then the funds don't apply right now.Hendo is permanent and it’s done.
ETH is being screwed over. Can’t afford any more signings. Chelsea can sign a billion players but we can only sign 3.
ETH is being screwed over. Can’t afford any more signings. Chelsea can sign a billion players but we can only sign 3.
Haha...should have clarified. I don't mean Onana, meant Altay Bayindir.Struggling to get past this
I’d like to see Mainoo come through but it’s going to be gradual. Say Casemiro gets injured just as Mainoo gets fit again, is it realistic to bring him straight in to play no6 in our system. Casemiro is struggling with it himself. And what happens if Case is unavailable before Mainoo gets fit?
I think we can bring a no6 in without closing the door on Mainoo. He’s still learning the game and was really more of a no8 than a no6 until very recently. He’s got the quality to push for a place before too long but it would be a big ask to lob him in now.
Mainoo is definitely liked by ten Hag. I think he'll go above McTominay in the squad player pecking order.I would like player development to be as smooth as possible consistent with the goal of amassing all trophies as possible. But if bring in Amrabat to support Casemiro that will stunt Mainoo's development. Amrabat is only 27 and if we were to sign him it would probably be on a three year contract. Despite the panic button merchants on the caf, Casemiro is far from done and will be a regular starter for us for at least two more seasons after this season. So how we do develop Mainoo under those circumstances? Perhaps on loan before September 1 for a half season with a decent Championship side and then we'll asses in January what's next for him.
But we can't have it both ways -- stocking talent with buys and developing our younger players at the same time.
This is no joke FSP 23/24 season states 90% of 2022/23 season can be spent on Wages, Financials, Net Transfer fee, Amortised transfer fees, Agent Fees, Expenses and incidentals. Our third quarter prediction was a final record Turnover of £630m which means the club can spend 90% of that value on all the above £567mI suppose this is a deliberate joke, if not, I think your figures may not be quite right.
Chelsea also sold what must be close to 90% of last year's squad and may actually be in the black this transfer window. Don't forget that. We on the other hand are well in the red and have been in the red in the transfer window for the last 10 years. That's is why we are broke.ETH is being screwed over. Can’t afford any more signings. Chelsea can sign a billion players but we can only sign 3.
Maybe. Alot of these journalists are full of sh!tMaybe the english press got it wrong?
has always been a waste of money.The Mount signing looks shitter by the minute...£50m wasted
Maybe the english press got it wrong?
Ok… we so we spent 200m on about 5 players. Chelsea spent that on 2…We've spent 70M for Hojlund, 60M on Mount and 45M for Onana... Last season 85M for Antony, 60M for Casemiro, 56M for Licha.
150-200M per season under Ten Hag. We've paid more than we should have for a lot of these players. How is he being screwed over? We're overspending, shouldn't be surprised it's hit us with FFP, some ridiculous prices here.
[...t]urnover of £630m which means the club can spend 90% of that value on all the above £567m
The Mount signing looks shitter by the minute...£50m wasted
He’s still being screwed over in the fact that our recruitment team and scouting team are so crap at there jobs he’s having to go to players he’s previously worked with… I read up something before that guardiola as signed like 1 player I think that’s he worked with previously. He tells his transfer team exactly the type of player he wants and I bet they give him a list and he’ll pick which one he prefers. We don’t get that luxury… either that or ETH is just dumb and thinks his previous players can do what they did for Ajax in the prem.Chelsea also sold what must be close to 90% of last year's squad and may actually be in the black this transfer window. Don't forget that. We on the other hand are well in the red and have been in the red in the transfer window for the last 10 years. That's is why we are broke.
Also, ETH is the last person being "screwed over" when he's spent close to £400m on players in two transfer windows. He has no excuse to not put out a good product on the pitch this season given that amount of money spent.
Ok… we so we spent 200m on about 5 players. Chelsea spent that on 2…
Maybe. Alot of these journalists are full of sh!t