Bwuk
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2012
- Messages
- 18,151
His best performance here by an absolute mile.
What the data doesn't tell you though is that he was fecking awful...I havent seen all of the 2nd half so im not going to insist this was the case in the 2nd, but this was my impression as well. In the first half he was in the right place to pickup a couple of loose balls, but actually didnt win any tackles or interceptions. I think one of the loose balls he picked up was like a long interception so its semantics on that one. He was caught on the ball and tackled and another time he played a suicide sideways pass straight into a Chelsea counter. He did play at least 1 or 2 good passes forward into players into good positions so, other than being simple with the ball and picking up a couple of loose balls he did have those couple of good forward passes to give some positives to his half. But it was a bad half.
2nd half I havent seen enough of so I'm just looking at the data and I can see he made 3 tackles in that half, which is 2nd only to Reguilon who was only on for 45 mins and made 4. Caicedo made 6 with more passes and touches. Amrabat had 2 dribbles
I'll watch it later but yeah it looked like he went from poor in the first half - with a couple of better moments, to a better more solid 2nd half
That pass back could have gone a lot worse only it was mudryk that was played inHe started off terribly and I thought I’d made my mind up on him but he was excellent in that second half.
Not sure what game you were watching. Easily his best performance. A real presence second half particularly. Even when he wasn't winning clean ball, he was right on his man, forced errors, disrupted and his passing was much more forceful and crisp. Big contributer out there tonight.What the data doesn't tell you though is that he was fecking awful...
What the data doesn't tell you though is that he was fecking awful...
I agree. I actually am still suprised, that Poch didn't manage to find a way to exploit the space we opened up with our press today. Many forward players were engaged and quite high, a ball in behind and things could have been rough. As they were on a couple of occasions. But to be perfectly honest - if that press thing is what ETH is going for, so be it. I am happy to see 5:3 or 3:2 wins all the time, at least this makes sure theres entertainment.Same, although this could be said of all the players.
I think on an individual level, most played quite decently, even good. The issue is that this was such a bad Chelsea side that if they had a bit more composure, they could have scored 4-5 or even more past us. So many transitions and spaces to exploit. This one man midfield thing is not it.
Yeah same here. Chelsea became weaker (I think) in the 2nd half so he had a few more moments to win balls and passing forward was good - but also aided by the fact that todays setup helped him as actually most players joined the press so he had many options in front of himself. In 1st half I was actually wondering how this player was able to rack up those passing stats on fbref because it looked so average to bad.I havent seen all of the 2nd half so im not going to insist this was the case in the 2nd, but this was my impression as well. In the first half he was in the right place to pickup a couple of loose balls, but actually didnt win any tackles or interceptions. I think one of the loose balls he picked up was like a long interception so its semantics on that one. He was caught on the ball and tackled and another time he played a suicide sideways pass straight into a Chelsea counter. He did play at least 1 or 2 good passes forward into players into good positions so, other than being simple with the ball and picking up a couple of loose balls he did have those couple of good forward passes to give some positives to his half. But it was a bad half.
2nd half I havent seen enough of so I'm just looking at the data and I can see he made 3 tackles in that half, which is 2nd only to Reguilon who was only on for 45 mins and made 4. Caicedo made 6 with more passes and touches. Amrabat had 2 dribbles
I'll watch it later but yeah it looked like he went from poor in the first half - with a couple of better moments, to a better more solid 2nd half
I agree, Mainoo and Amrabat together in midfield is something we'll see soon enough. Mainoo is a natural #6/#8 type of player who should be encouraged to get forward. But that doesn't mean he can't come deeper and form a two with Amrabat when building the play.Mainoo is a talented kid. I don’t think we’ll ruin him by giving him some licence to get forward from time to time. For his development that would be helpful. I agree he is best suited to the no6 area but he looks comfortable moving forward. He has some qualities in common with FDJ - he’s a natural all-round footballer.
It will be interesting if Amrabat goes on a solid run of form. We’ll see then if they are really competing for one spot or whether EtH tries getting them both in.
I agree. I actually am still suprised, that Poch didn't manage to find a way to exploit the space we opened up with our press today. Many forward players were engaged and quite high, a ball in behind and things could have been rough. As they were on a couple of occasions. But to be perfectly honest - if that press thing is what ETH is going for, so be it. I am happy to see 5:3 or 3:2 wins all the time, at least this makes sure theres entertainment.
It must be pointed out that a) Dalot had a pretty fine day today and b) that Dalot was actually tucking into midfield today. A lot. Obviously it helps to have matched numbers in this area of the pitch.
Yeah same here. Chelsea became weaker (I think) in the 2nd half so he had a few more moments to win balls and passing forward was good - but also aided by the fact that todays setup helped him as actually most players joined the press so he had many options in front of himself. In 1st half I was actually wondering how this player was able to rack up those passing stats on fbref because it looked so average to bad.
Read the post. Not amrabat, the poster was using Caicedo’s stats to say he was better, but Caicedo was awful and dominated by our midfield.Not sure what game you were watching. Easily his best performance. A real presence second half particularly. Even when he wasn't winning clean ball, he was right on his man, forced errors, disrupted and his passing was much more forceful and crisp. Big contributer out there tonight.
Caicado that is not Amrabat for clarity! Amrabat was great, his best performance in a Utd shirt.You thought so? I can see why you would have that opinion from the first half. He reminded me a bit of Fred in that he made some silly mistakes which could be very costly, but he also made a couple of fairly good passes so he wasnt complete and utter trash.
2nd half again I havent seen it properly. When I do I'll give an overall rating
This is where I'm at. Such a hard game to gauge our team by. Chelsea were so appallingly bad that I'm reluctant to use them for a measure of anything.Much better but Chelsea gave him the freedom of the pitch. I don't think we learned much, he is a tidy player when given time and space on the ball as we saw at Fiorentina.
Why won't it be the norm? All he needs is regular game time. Can't bench someone 5 games straight and expect instant performance. Game speed is not training speed.He played well, but this won’t be the norm for him.
Not sure what game you were watching. Easily his best performance. A real presence second half particularly. Even when he wasn't winning clean ball, he was right on his man, forced errors, disrupted and his passing was much more forceful and crisp. Big contributer out there tonight.
Read the post. Not amrabat, the poster was using Caicedo’s stats to say he was better, but Caicedo was awful and dominated by our midfield.
My bad, lads.I think he meant Caicedo was awful.