Yeah, he’s obviously not comfortable there but was doing a decent job. Lost concentration when he got tired and, frankly it’s bound to happen when you’re playing out of position.There were times and periods where he looked completely fine and comfortable playing leftback for us tonight. But then he was suddenly making mistakes at the back. The Gala 2nd he was involved pulled out of position which had a chain reaction needing his defenders to cover him and they failed. It was a normal thing to happen to a fullback so is something that can happen with our actual fullbacks.
However, the final goal is from a hopeful long ball forward that wasnt on and then playing the player onside. That one is all him
Yia might as well play with a CB there. Lindelof at LB with Evans or Harry partnering Varane.Yeah, he’s obviously not comfortable there but was doing a decent job. Lost concentration when he got tired and, frankly it’s bound to happen when you’re playing out of position.
EtH didn’t have too many palatable options but with hindsight it looks like it was a mistake to play him there.
I think we have to start making some safe, solid selections (if any exist), to pick up some sort of result.Yia might as well play with a CB there. Lindelof at LB with Evans or Harry partnering Varane.
Thats probably a very exclusive perspective.MOTM after Højlund, even with that mistake.
Well I share some of your concerns but I don’t think it is a stretch to imagine he will play better in his regular position. He did pretty well for the most part and looked decent in his other games for us. People have said “he’s not a left back” and I would agree with that.Thats probably a very exclusive perspective.
I am a bit discouraged that he seems as timid as he does. Where is all the bulldog'ness that was described before? I think, latest when Casemiro went off, he should have been moved to midfield, but he didn't impress today because he was playing a traditional LB role. He looks like a player who a) doesn't look like physically ready for this and b) like player who is used way more time on the ball. Both things could get better over time, lets hope so, but if that isn't happening, I am glad, it is only a loan. But very early days, lets hope he improves and gets more accustomed to his team mates and the competitions. And lets lower the expectations, it doesn't help anybody when some are now trying to continue their songs by insisting that he will be so much better only by getting a starting position that is a little further up and more central.
He for sure isn't but he also isn't asked to play like a traditional leftback. He is already moving into the center, interchanging with the CBs to support 1st phase play and generally being a pivot in the buildup. That is not going to change dramatically when he plays where Casemiro plays. He won't get more space and time there, he won't be expectated to cover less ground and to add some steele. I think, he is doing just fine for now, right to the level that can be expected from a new player in a new league. But until today, I am yet to see some of the steel, bite and especially the kind of progressive passing that has to be in there somewhere. Don't get me wrong, he was ok, but the biggest selling point was that he is at least(weird choice of words but I am sure you understand what I mean) exceptional with progressive long passes but by now, he wasn't able to show it.Well I share some of your concerns but I don’t think it is a stretch to imagine he will play better in his regular position. He did pretty well for the most part and looked decent in his other games for us. People have said “he’s not a left back” and I would agree with that.
Read the effusive comments in his debut match thread. He showed a lot. I think you are underestimating the effect the responsibility of being the left back would have on your general play. Playing no6 knowing you have a left back with you is different to playing no6 when you also have to BE the left back.He for sure isn't but he also isn't asked to play like a traditional leftback. He is already moving into the center, interchanging with the CBs to support 1st phase play and generally being a pivot in the buildup. That is not going to change dramatically when he plays where Casemiro plays. He won't get more space and time there, he won't be expectated to cover less ground and to add some steele. I think, he is doing just fine for now, right to the level that can be expected from a new player in a new league. But until today, I am yet to see some of the steel, bite and especially the kind of progressive passing that has to be in there somewhere. Don't get me wrong, he was ok, but the biggest selling point was that he is at least(weird choice of words but I am sure you understand what I mean) exceptional with progressive long passes but by now, he wasn't able to show it.
Lindelof and Varane were hopelessly out of position for the winner.Get Lindelgod as RB, put Dalot as left back and get this guy in the middle where he belongs.
Was hopelessly out of position for the winner, looks tidy on the ball though, so get him in the middle influencing things.
No,Lindelof and Varane were hopelessly out of position for the winner.
No,
Amrabat was playing Icardi onside.
Ten Hag then.Shaw, Malacia, Regulion. How many clubs have three strong left backs, and yet none of them available and forced to play a midfielder as a left back? Not to mention that our right back AWB is also injured, otherwise we'd have played Dalot on the left.
We need somebody to remove whatever curse was put on our club this season
He doesn't step up, the CBs have stepped up, Amrabat is dawdling and too deep, he should be in line leaving Icardi in. He had time to do so.Think thats harsh. Hes dropped a bit deeper to play the pass, its a poor pass. The CBs are not in position to protect against a transition e.g if the pass is intercepted.
Amrabat makes a poor pass.
The CBs are in the wrong position in relation to Amrabat.They left Icardi on his own
He doesn't step up, the CBs have stepped up, Amrabat is dawdling and too deep, he should be in line leaving Icardi in. He had time to do so.
The CBs shouldn't be in line with the LB, it should be the CBs leading the line and so the LB should be the one stepping up.
There's a reason Lindelgod and Varane had stepped up together.
I think had that been the first half he probably would have stepped up, but he switched off momentarily and it cost us.
Thats probably a very exclusive perspective.
I am a bit discouraged that he seems as timid as he does. Where is all the bulldog'ness that was described before? I think, latest when Casemiro went off, he should have been moved to midfield, but he didn't impress today because he was playing a traditional LB role. He looks like a player who a) doesn't look like physically ready for this and b) like player who is used way more time on the ball. Both things could get better over time, lets hope so, but if that isn't happening, I am glad, it is only a loan. But very early days, lets hope he improves and gets more accustomed to his team mates and the competitions. And lets lower the expectations, it doesn't help anybody when some are now trying to continue their songs by insisting that he will be so much better only by getting a starting position that is a little further up and more central.
Disagree entirely, no CBs would drop deeper in that situation, they are leading the line.The CBs stepped up when we had the ball. He dropped deeper with the ball to make the pass. At that point they needed to drop
Everything you are saying relates to when the opposition has the ball. When we have the ball its about rest defence and being able to stop transition. They should be aware we have the ball deeper and our players should be able to see the CF
He's not a LB and I'm certain Ten Hag sees that, he's playing him there because he wants to be smart with inverted fullbacks joining midfield.
We need to play simple midfield base of Amrabat and Casemiro together. Play Dalot LB and whoever on RB, Lindelof, even feckin McTominay. It's not like we're doing anything offensively on right hand side anyway, so at least let's have more threat on the left and seal the midfield.
Disagree entirely, no CBs would drop deeper in that situation, they are leading the line.
Amrabat should have stepped up and didn't.
The ball was played forward, Amrabat should have the awareness to step up, leave Icardi offside, alas he didn't. Not entirely his fault, that's not his natural game but he should still know and do better.
Just one snippet from a write-up on the game last night: Victor Lindelöf stepped up and watched the ball bounce past him and Icardi was through, Amrabat having played him onside
Hard to judge a player being played completely out of position. But I still believe he's far too slow with the ball and will be caught out in midfield
He can step up, quite easily. Anyone that's played the game or follows the game should know he needs to step up there, a simple glance across the line would tell him thatHe can't step up that quick though. It's impossible. He launched the ball and a second later its headed back and Icardi is through.
The pass was the problem.
But ETH can't complain, he's clearly asked his players to go long and this is what you get as a result
What else was he supposed to say? That he can't play fullback but that's the only option left? I wouldn't pay much attention to what ETH says publicly.Ten Hag said he was able to play LB when we signed him (rightly or wrongly). Hopefully he's realised that he was wrong.
Other than the positional change, I think he's another midfielder that falls into the 'average' bracket that many of our others do/did (McTominay, Fred, Sabitzer, VDB). I don't think he looks better than Fred if I'm honest. Maybe more robust physically, but a lot slower with a bit of an ambling gait, not overly assured on the ball, his passes have a loose look at times even if they do somehow make it to their man. If I'm honest, an opposition manager will be looking at him in midfield as a big opportunity - as soon as he is pressed he is all over the place, much like Fred.
He's certainly not going to revolutionise our midfield like some hoped. In the right set up with a decent plan then he could form part of a solid midfield 3 unit. Don't think he's got the outstanding individual qualities to really stand out the way we try to play.
What else was he supposed to say? That he can't play fullback but that's the only option left? I wouldn't pay much attention to what ETH says publicly.
Back to Amrabat, there were two views presented in his thread when we were after him. First group made him look like deep lying playmaker with great engine and superb passing skills. Second group was a bit sceptical as there wasn't any serious interest in Amrabat from other clubs, and every clip he looked good presented him in acres of space doing a diagonal pass.
Truth is, he was bought as a squad player, and similarly like with Mount, I think he brings something different to the team while not a game changer himself. I think he's a better player than McTominay and that is OK. But regarding Fred, I always thought this is a mistake to sell him for peanuts and it doesn't seem like we've replaced him (I also think Hannibal will be dismissed soon).
McTominay's bad periods massively outweigh the good though. He was good for the first month under ETH, then was poor for the rest of last season. The season before he was good for the first month under Rangnick, poor the rest. So two good months in two seasons. The season before that I don't think he had any good runs of form, just the odd good match here and there. For instance 'that' Leeds match that people still talk about was followed directly by his worst ever performance against Leicester.In response to the bolded part, he said this before the injury to Reguilon. This was when we first signed him and it wasn't even looking like he would be needed at LB at that point. What I'm saying is that having to play Amrabat at LB wasn't an issue in ETH's eyes as he already viewed him as a player that could play there.
I agree with the rest of what you say. The only point I would make is that McTominay hasn't always been a disaster. He kept Casemiro out of the team for a while last season due to him playing well. It was the same with Fred, hot and cold all the time. McTominay is the same but he is currently blowing cold and the opinion of him reflects that. I can just see Amrabat falling into the same category. Like you said, not a game changer or a world beater but if he's playing well then he can offer something different maybe. What it is that he will offer largely remains to be seen, I think an inform McTominay offers similar attributes based on what I've seen so far (bar maybe the odd long diagonal that Amrabat plays). But the harrying, working hard, physicality, short safe passes is all things McTominay offers when he is on his game.
Surely we have a youth team player who could be brought in for a few games at LB? Amrabat looks like he could be allright in his natural position, but at LB he doesn't have the positional awareness.