AdNani
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
- Messages
- 1,784
Id take 12th this year if it meant they fecked offYup, seems very surreal
Id take 12th this year if it meant they fecked offYup, seems very surreal
Theres way to much noise for it not to be true, it's just whether anything materialises.Hard not to get sucked in when you want something to be true
I mean in this instance, selling their asset, it's the natural thing to doTheres way to much noise for it not to be true, it's just whether anything materialises.
Glazers will likely press for the most they can get, as all they've ever cared about is money
Of course it is, but even over the last god knows how many years, all they've cared about is how much they can make from the club. They've done the bare minimum to ensure that they keep making money off usI mean in this instance, selling their asset, it's the natural thing to do
Same and I’m normally sceptical as feck about any positive news when it comes to United over the last few years.I'm already so invested in this I can't help it.
CruelLeveraged buy outs
Dont forget ratcliffe also owns 33% of Mercedes F1 team. Utd marketing arm being the relentless machine it is, i can see some Mercedes/Utd teamup merchandise in the future (if he bought utd).
Wrong. How much of their own money have they put in? How much have they made? They haven't put any of their money and made 200m$ in addition to whatever they will when they sell.
I mean in this instance, selling their asset, it's the natural thing to do
I can't see these rules they implemented to work backdated in retrospect, unfortunatelyCan the PL force the glazers to sell because of how they're treating the club? I think they have some new guidelines on leveraged buyouts because of what happened with us.
Doubt it, would be good thoughCan the PL force the glazers to sell because of how they're treating the club? I think they have some new guidelines on leveraged buyouts because of what happened with us.
OGC Nice and no the UEFA allows it. You even have clubs that own other clubs for example AS Monaco owns the Cercle Brugge.Errr....how can he hold a stake in Utd and own Nice FC (french football club). Dont UEFA normally not allow this?
In celebration of this great news tonight I shall sniff the contents of the kitchen cupboard*.Chemicals.
How wealthy is Ratcliffe compared to owners of other football teams?
Wondering how complicated the financial leveraging would be for him to buy/run the club and what degree of returns he'd need to see for it to be viable.
Britains richest man, yes realistic.Who's this guy and is it realistic?
Bid 4.25 bill right at the end. It was the highest bid as well if you believe the reports.I didn’t follow the Chelsea sale closely, why did he have zero chance of that going through?
Differs between 12b and 21b but Ineos are worth around 61b
So if thats the case, buying United should be easily doable for him if he can persuaid the Glazers to sell for 4bnBid 4.25 bill right at the end. It was the highest bid as well if you believe the reports.
Oh. Good then.Britains richest man, yes realistic.
How wealthy is Ratcliffe compared to owners of other football teams?
Oh. Good then.
Who's this guy and is it realistic?
OK. I'm camping here then.Britain's richest man a few years ago, now officially residing in Monaco. Owns INEOS and made his money in the Chemicals/Energy field. INEOS also own OGC Nice. Ratcliffe is worth about £20 billion. From Oldham and is a United fan.
Whether it's realistic depends on the Glazers, of course, but in terms of whether he is a credible buyer, I think he very much is. He's distanced himself in the past and said he'd only get involved if the club was put up for sale. He's now straight in with the spokesman comment, and media coverage. He put a £4.25 billion bid in for Chelsea at the eleventh hour, which was seen as a signal of his intent to later bid for United.