- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 432
De gea is the best possible keeper we can have for the foreseeable.
people need forget this bad with feet stuff. A goalkeepers first job is keeping the ball out the net, there are very few better.
De gea for the last 9 years has had the worst of worst defended in front of him. Very rarely had a settled back four. Even this season varane or Martinez have had their injury problems. For a man United goalkeeper he is major over worked. De Gea is facing more shots in a game than big ed or schmeichel would face over a month of football. If your facing that many attacks eventually your gonna make mistakes it’s enevitable.
Schmeichel to me the greatest keeper I’ve ever seen was fond of the odd mad howler slicing a clearance or two and rush’s of blood to the head but he is maybe only facing 2/3 shots a game so mistakes seem few and far between.
De gea has saved us alot more than cost us and will continue to do so.
we shouldn’t be playing short from the back anyway cause it just invites trouble and we aren’t good enough to do it.
I'm sorry to be blunt, but this is simply emotional drivel, with no basis in neither facts or stats.
Schmeichel played in an era where teams didn't press us high. So he didn't really need to be great with his feet. Still, he was miles better at sweeping and collecting crosses than de Gea, even though he was prone to clangers.
As so many have already pointed out, the main problem with de Gea is that he stops us from becoming a side who can dominate possession and control games.
De Gea hurts us both defensively and offensively by not being able to:
1. Recycle possession without having to boot it long all the time.
2. Pick up high balls so the opposition don't create chances and we don't have to make clearances back into their feet.
3. Pass through the press to progress our possession up the field.
4. Maintain a high sweeping line, so that our midfield and attackers can maintain their high line.
5. Positionally command our backline, and effectively direct them by constantly pointing out the best passing lines, like any good keeper constantly does.
By replacing de Gea with a modern keeper who is an average shot stopper, but great with his feet, can collect crosses and maintain a sweeping line, as well as command, we will:
1. Concede far less chances and goals against.
2. Be more in control of the ball, thus increase our own chances and goals.
This goes to show that replacing de Gea improves us not only defensively, but also offensively.
You want to improve us both defensively and offensively? You can just replace de Gea with almost any other goalkeeper who plays in Europe's top 6 (including Portugal) leagues. That's a statistical fact. That also includes the goalkeepers sat on the bench at most clubs.
A modern goalkeeper's job is no longer defined by his shot stopping as the primary attribute. If that was the case, Ederson wouldn't be considered world class. Ederson's shot stopping isn't great, it's just good enough. But, he is a fantastic ball handling footballer, who acts as a third centre back, thus creating overloads in City's defense. As a result, creating chances and maintaining possession in City's final third is too hard for most teams to do. And this leads to them conceding far less chances and goals, than if they just had a great shot stopper like de Gea...
...you know, like Joe Hart was for City.
Last edited: