Should Ten Hag get the sack if he fails to qualify for the CL?

Should ten Hag get the sack if he fails to qualify for the Champions League?

  • Total voters
    1,415
  • Poll closed .
King7Eric said:
Great post. The fact that people are claiming we could finish 3rd and win the FA Cup and this thread will look stupid are missing the point. The question of whether ETH is the man stood even after we beat Barca ( at least for me) and is not knee jerk. Our recent down turn in form is not shocking but something you could see coming because we just don't control games.

I see people happily ignoring this fact and blaming it on fatigue or lack of #9 but this issue has always been there and you don't need a world class #9 to be controlling games. There are massive questions going into next season, irrespective of how this season ends. Probably a large section will be placated getting top 4 but I think there are a lot of red flags that need to be addressed.
Click to expand...
To be honest, all Ten Hag has done is what his predecessors have done and spent a lot of money in the hope of achieving what we were sold as 'his project'. He was lucky and won the League Cup, but we are still as bad a side as we were under Jose, Ole et al. We were just foolish in believing this was some 'new dawn' of some messiah from the Eredivisie - I know I will be shot down, but I do not think he is the change we require.

I do hope I am wrong and am quite happy to admit to it if it turns out differently, but I think under a more ruthless management structure than the Glaziers, Ten Hag would be out at the end of the season.
 
King7Eric said:
Great post. The fact that people are claiming we could finish 3rd and win the FA Cup and this thread will look stupid are missing the point. The question of whether ETH is the man stood even after we beat Barca ( at least for me) and is not knee jerk. Our recent down turn in form is not shocking but something you could see coming because we just don't control games.

I see people happily ignoring this fact and blaming it on fatigue or lack of #9 but this issue has always been there and you don't need a world class #9 to be controlling games. There are massive questions going into next season, irrespective of how this season ends. Probably a large section will be placated getting top 4 but I think there are a lot of red flags that need to be addressed.
Click to expand...
I believe alot of fans have been reduced to ' having a good season' narrative and not the 'best team in the country' narrative. In that when we win a cup competition and masks the manager from any criticism. Yet even in demanding clubs, a cup competition win is not a insulation to scrutiny but league wins & being involved in a title race is more accepted as genuine effort.

It does seems because of 10 years of being in the wilderness, United fans and to some degree the board/owners of the club just need to have a good season. A cup competition + top4 is a very good season to United ecosystem now.

This can be said is what's happening/happened to Arsenal in the last 19 years or so. They do have some season which they are good season but never have they been the best club in the country ( bar this season if you discredit City).

You can see the difference in how Chelsea (before last year) or Real or Barca have operate in those 15 years and see for them they usually want to be the best in the country on top of having a good season.

In 19 years of Abramovich era, Chelsea won 21 trophies. The most in that period in England. In that period Arsenal won I think 5 trophies. Arguments about the best club in London have grown in voice, because of Chelsea European wins, and 1992 - Premier League wins. What Abramovich was able to do is to know when to pull the plug both ways, either to sign or fire.

Yes we can blame sugar daddy or more money but United of Pre 2013 was not the biggest spenders but we would win 7 titles on the bounce if not for 1 point and goal difference in two seasons. Yet the United of post 2013 is one of the biggest spenders/biggest wage bill yet we have never been involved in a title race leave alone winning it.

Same as City Post 2008, before Pep City were winning one odd title in 3 years while they would outspend everyone. But when Pep arrived it has now changed to you will win the league when City have a off season.

So it shows two things,

First management have to have the desire to be the top club in the country. This desire should be replicated in signing of managers/scouts/DoF/Players etc.

Then Secondly, in choosing the best/right manager you place the direction of the football team on the pitch/ off the pitch to be in the hands of the best manager in the country.

In your honest opinion, would Ole compete with Pep or Klopp? Managers who have been involved in multiple Champions League Finals and title races? In one off games he might but in the grand scheme of things you will know you won League titles and who relegated a club in top leagues.

Now for ETH, if he wants to succeed in Man United he needs to know he competes with the absolute best in Pep and Klopp. This is first and foremost to him as a Coach. In that he needs to be tactically better or at par with Klopp and Pep in how a Premier League Season goes about. This is an individual battle. Not squad players, system, injuries, fatigue etc. This is an individual capabilities battle.

Klopp & Pep have done it severally, and shown they can conjure a team to amass 90 + points in sustained period of time. So individually you can say they are at par level. Now, things like money, squad players comes into play but individually they are 2 best.

As an example... Same as Halland vs Martial. We can say Halland plays in a better system that's why he's better etc but at the end of the day Halland is a better striker than Martial. Individually. There is no single day, Martial even placed as City no9 can be better than Halland.

So Ten Hag has to learn quickly how to control and win 30 games in a season that will place him at par with Pep, Klopp and now Arteta in fighting for who is the best coach/team that season.

Arteta did learn massively, and it has paid off in progress even if they don't win the title this season.

So we should cross our fingers that ETH learns, changes the system/structure of the team to enable us be competitive in around 30 -33 games in a Premier League Season. (Wins + draw games).

Margin of error is losing 4-5 games in a season & Being competitive in the rest 33 games.
 
Last edited:
I originally voted 'Yep' but that was due to feeling a bit aggrieved at how much we've started to wobble.

Fact is I think the system he's playing seems to be working, we've been really guilty of not taking chances then letting other teams into it, we really should have been at least 2 up against Brighton for instance.

I really think in a season's time, we'll be taking more of the chances we create and have a stronger stomach for closing out games, and I think that then gives us a platform to get back to challenging consistently...
 
Too soon to call. Overreaction to weekend results. He needs time.
 
Licha-Vidic said:
I believe alot of fans have been reduced to ' having a good season' narrative and not the 'best team in the country' narrative. In that when we win a cup competition and masks the manager from any criticism. Yet even in demanding clubs, a cup competition win is not a insulation to scrutiny but league wins & being involved in a title race is more accepted as genuine effort.

It does seems because of 10 years of being in the wilderness, United fans and to some degree the board/owners of the club just need to have a good season. A cup competition + top4 is a very good season to United ecosystem now.

This can be said is what's happening/happened to Arsenal in the last 19 years or so. They do have some season which they are good season but never have they been the best club in the country ( bar this season if you discredit City).

You can see the difference in how Chelsea (before last year) or Real or Barca have operate in those 15 years and see for them they usually want to be the best in the country on top of having a good season.

In 19 years of Abramovich era, Chelsea won 21 trophies. The most in that period in England. In that period Arsenal won I think 5 trophies. Arguments about the best club in London have grown in voice, because of Chelsea European wins, and 1992 - Premier League wins. What Abramovich was able to do is to know when to pull the plug both ways, either to sign or fire.

Yes we can blame sugar daddy or more money but United of Pre 2013 was not the biggest spenders but we would win 7 titles on the bounce if not for 1 point and goal difference in two seasons. Yet the United of post 2013 is one of the biggest spenders/biggest wage bill yet we have never been involved in a title race leave alone winning it.

Same as City Post 2008, before Pep City were winning one odd title in 3 years while they would outspend everyone. But when Pep arrived it has now changed to you will win the league when City have a off season.

So it shows two things,

First management have to have the desire to be the top club in the country. This desire should be replicated in signing of managers/scouts/DoF/Players etc.

Then Secondly, in choosing the best/right manager you place the direction of the football team on the pitch/ off the pitch to be in the hands of the best manager in the country.

In your honest opinion, would Ole compete with Pep or Klopp? Managers who have been involved in multiple Champions League Finals and title races? In one off games he might but in the grand scheme of things you will know you won League titles and who relegated a club in top leagues.

Now for ETH, if he wants to succeed in Man United he needs to know he competes with the absolute best in Pep and Klopp. This is first and foremost to him as a Coach. In that he needs to be tactically better or at par with Klopp and Pep in how a Premier League Season goes about. This is an individual battle. Not squad players, system, injuries, fatigue etc. This is an individual capabilities battle.

Klopp & Pep have done it severally, and shown they can conjure a team to amass 90 + points in sustained period of time. So individually you can say they are at par level. Now, things like money, squad players comes into play but individually they are 2 best.

As an example... Same as Halland vs Martial. We can say Halland plays in a better system that's why he's better etc but at the end of the day Halland is a better striker than Martial. Individually. There is no single day, Martial even placed as City no9 can be better than Halland.

So Ten Hag has to learn quickly how to control and win 30 games in a season that will place him at par with Pep, Klopp and now Arteta in fighting for who is the best coach/team that season.

Arteta did learn massively, and it has paid off in progress even if they don't win the title this season.

So we should cross our fingers that ETH learns, changes the system/structure of the team to enable us be competitive in around 30 -33 games in a Premier League Season. (Wins + draw games).

Margin of error is losing 4-5 games in a season & Being competitive in the rest 33 games.
Click to expand...
You've hit the nail right on the head. The aim for every top club ( Man Utd, City, Real, Barca etc) should always to be the best team in the land. Trophies should be a consequence of being the best, not an isolated occurrence. I mean Leicester won the FA Cup 2 years ago and they are about to be relegated. The reason being that win was not a result of sustained excellence, but rather a result of 6-7 good games

My biggest gripe with the club ( and this comes back to the owners at the end of the day and something Gary Neville keeps repeating but people keep making fun of him) is that Utd have lost the desire to have sustained excellence and become dependent on finding a fix for each season/situation as it comes along. Winning the League Cup or Europa League is not indicative of sustained excellence. As you say we need players and staff who are going to be excellent 30-31 out of 38 games. We just don't have that personnel and unless the leadership of this club pulls in that direction, we aren't ever going to be back to the top.
 
Craziest thread on CAF. He is doing a great job with minimal support from your higher ups. Your form was shite last season. This season the goals have dried up but despite asking for a forward you got WOOOOT. Come on. No one will be “successful” with that useless sack of shit. You’ve made so much progress, be grateful.
 
SirReginald said:
Craziest thread on CAF. He is doing a great job with minimal support from your higher ups. Your form was shite last season. This season the goals have dried up but despite asking for a forward you got WOOOOT. Come on. No one will be “successful” with that useless sack of shit. You’ve made so much progress, be grateful.
Click to expand...

What do you mean by minimal support from higher ups? He has met my expectations but it's not without a pretty good support of the higher ups, who allowed him to bring pricy players.
 
SirReginald said:
Craziest thread on CAF. He is doing a great job with minimal support from your higher ups. Your form was shite last season. This season the goals have dried up but despite asking for a forward you got WOOOOT. Come on. No one will be “successful” with that useless sack of shit. You’ve made so much progress, be grateful.
Click to expand...

Meh Eddie Howe has done more for Newcastle with lesser players and budget. De Zerbi the same for Brighton while losing Trossard. He's done well but if he fails to get top 4 then he is a failure and should be sacked.
 
SirReginald said:
Craziest thread on CAF. He is doing a great job with minimal support from your higher ups. Your form was shite last season. This season the goals have dried up but despite asking for a forward you got WOOOOT. Come on. No one will be “successful” with that useless sack of shit. You’ve made so much progress, be grateful.
Click to expand...

Yeah…

You know who brought in Wout, right…?

And you know who keeps STARTING him… right?

And you know who brought in Antony for 90m… right?

Cuz it sounds a bit like saying this Tory government are doing well considering how difficult Brexit has made it for England.
 
Revan said:
After calming down and thinking more, I changed my vote. I haven’t seen much to convince me he is that good, but it is clear that the structure above him is a far bigger problem. Changing the manager won’t change anything except worsen the problem cause then we would go for another style having even less suitable players.

Saying that, even without much financial backing, I think we should expect 73-75 points plus next season (coaching and young players like Diallo, Garnacho and Pellestri having a higher role). And if we somehow back him with 200m+ war chest, then I think we should be looking for an 80+ point season if not competing for title for him to deserve a third season.

Saying that, I also expect the new hierarchy to be far less patient, especially if Qatar buys the club so I can understand them sacking ten Hag and bringing their own manager (and supporting structure) if we do not get top 4.
Click to expand...
Agree with this in principle. Our standards while should always be high need to be proportional to the structures in place. This doesn't mean any manager gets a free ride either.
 
Mou Mou Land said:
To be honest, all Ten Hag has done is what his predecessors have done and spent a lot of money in the hope of achieving what we were sold as 'his project'. He was lucky and won the League Cup, but we are still as bad a side as we were under Jose, Ole et al. We were just foolish in believing this was some 'new dawn' of some messiah from the Eredivisie - I know I will be shot down, but I do not think he is the change we require.

I do hope I am wrong and am quite happy to admit to it if it turns out differently, but I think under a more ruthless management structure than the Glaziers, Ten Hag would be out at the end of the season.
Click to expand...
When or if we become a club with a preffered style of play coming from owners/DOF. Well sign players and managers/coaches that fit into that style using stringent due diligence and scouting.
So when we say 'should we sack the manager' who is the 'we' because its just us fans at the moment like little DOFs deciding if he suits our criteria. At the moment 'we' as a club are feeling around in the dark and have been for countless years.
 
We are in a transition season. Sacking him at the end of it would have to go down as one of the worst decisions the club has made.

Look at Pep and Klopp in their transition seasons.
 
kidbob said:
Meh Eddie Howe has done more for Newcastle with lesser players and budget. De Zerbi the same for Brighton while losing Trossard. He's done well but if he fails to get top 4 then he is a failure and should be sacked.
Click to expand...

1) Neither of those coaches went far in 4 competitions winning a cup along the way and getting to another final. We’ll see how Newcastle ad Howe fare with a Champions League schedule next season.

2) It’s admirable what De Zerbi is doing at Brighton but it’s still Brighton. A lot less pressure. Potter did great with Brighton and look at what happened at Chelsea. A) There is way more pressure at big clubs B) you compete for places with the best coaches in the world, whereas at mid-table you compete with geniuses like Frank Lampard.

I mean I kind of get it that people are sick of the Ferguson example regarding the “bad start, but worth the patience” but just look at Arsenal and Arteta for a very recent reference.

I really don’t get why so many are this fickle. There’s plenty of reasons for the poor performances where Ten Haag is not at all at fault. A squad with no quality depth fighting on four fronts, injuries, no quality striker, etc etc.

If the structure does not improve no coach in the world will get this team challenging. If it does, it’s just sensible to give Ten Haag a proper chance over a longer period.
 
jadajos said:
1) Neither of those coaches went far in 4 competitions winning a cup along the way and getting to another final. We’ll see how Newcastle ad Howe fare with a Champions League schedule next season.

2) It’s admirable what De Zerbi is doing at Brighton but it’s still Brighton. A lot less pressure. Potter did great with Brighton and look at what happened at Chelsea. A) There is way more pressure at big clubs B) you compete for places with the best coaches in the world, whereas at mid-table you compete with geniuses like Frank Lampard.

I mean I kind of get it that people are sick of the Ferguson example regarding the “bad start, but worth the patience” but just look at Arsenal and Arteta for a very recent reference.

I really don’t get why so many are this fickle. There’s plenty of reasons for the poor performances where Ten Haag is not at all at fault. A squad with no quality depth fighting on four fronts, injuries, no quality striker, etc etc.

If the structure does not improve no coach in the world will get this team challenging. If it does, it’s just sensible to give Ten Haag a proper chance over a longer period.
Click to expand...

Probably because since ferguson retired we've had more than one manager where keeping them on longer did more damage
 
moses said:
I think Elanga looks better, which is not hard because Wout is awful to watch moving, never mind playing football, but I think he's much smarter than Elanga. Elanga is limited and would be swamped and lost anywhere in from the wings.
Click to expand...
Elanga is limited but from what we have seen of him (and we have seen a lot cause he was a regular last season), he is significantly better for United than Weghorst. He is much faster, actually scored a header or two without being 3m tall, and like Weghorst tries to press (without incredible success).

I am far from his biggest fan and I do not see why we still have him in our books, but he cannot be worse than Weghorst. No one can.
 
crossy1686 said:
Personally, I’ve got no idea why anyone would want their club to be like 13 times champions league winners Real Madrid. #hollow
Click to expand...
14 times, actually. But to be fair, it IS hard to keep track at this point. feckers.
 
kidbob said:
Meh Eddie Howe has done more for Newcastle with lesser players and budget. De Zerbi the same for Brighton while losing Trossard. He's done well but if he fails to get top 4 then he is a failure and should be sacked.
Click to expand...

Newcastle have spent more than us though, haven't they?
 
Idxomer said:
This isn't a knee-jerk thread. No other United manager survived not qualifying for the CL in his first full season post-Fergie.

It's a distinct possibility now. Should he stay or go if it happens?

We need a poll.
Click to expand...

Of course not. Season seen as a whole, we've shown good progress.
 
Rojofiam said:
Does it matter one bit now that Arteta lost out on top 4 last season because 1 or 2 games didn't go Arsenal's way? Does it matter 12 months later that Spurs finished on 71 points and Arsenal finished on 69?

Let's say Liverpool finish on 71 points. There are loads of you that would continue with ten Hag if we get 72 points, but sack him if we only get 70.

Incredibly flawed way of thinking.
Click to expand...

This.
 
If people are seriously advocating for him to be sacked then that's really a bit crazy. Why would we ever let any new manager have time to build anything then? If they aren't immediately successful with the absolutely diabolical squad they are lumped with when they join, then sack them and bring in someone else.

Let the new manager start again with the useless, lazy, cowardly players staying on because it can't possibly be them! Has to be the manager and if he can't turn them into decent players with some bottle after one season then he's clearly shit. Just keep going through managers that way until finally we're calling Big Sam to bail us out.
 
No. No. No. No. If he had in any way lost the dressing, sell all.
 
Still curious to see what his vision for us is, this next transfer window will tell us a lot.
 
Denis79 said:
Still curious to see what his vision for us is, this next transfer window will tell us a lot.
Click to expand...
yeah for me this is key with the new ownership. Do we still have players like fred, mctominay, maguire etc around. Players we have seen either arent good enough or dont fit what we want?
 
Mou Mou Land said:
To be honest, all Ten Hag has done is what his predecessors have done and spent a lot of money in the hope of achieving what we were sold as 'his project'. He was lucky and won the League Cup, but we are still as bad a side as we were under Jose, Ole et al. We were just foolish in believing this was some 'new dawn' of some messiah from the Eredivisie
Click to expand...
Strange that "New members" always seem to hate our football club. Calling us lucky for winning the league cup is a joke of a way to be posting. Is it luck we are in the FA cup final as well? If we carry on being as lucky with Ten Hag we will be lucky right up to winning the Champions League.

Complain about our shit tier away performances if you like, and for sure the players mentality, when we've gone behind in games we've lost our heads big time but we've done extemely well in all the cups. Even the Sevilla game was a freak really, down to 10 men through injuries to all our defence etc and deflected own goals... Yeah.

Ten Hag has generally sent teams out that have dominated the beginning of matches. Even Vs city, Barcelona, Arsenal, Sevilla etc. It's been mental strength that's let us down. MAYBE that comes from the manager, but I think that's more a player problem now.
 
Von Mistelroum said:
If people are seriously advocating for him to be sacked then that's really a bit crazy. Why would we ever let any new manager have time to build anything then? If they aren't immediately successful with the absolutely diabolical squad they are lumped with when they join, then sack them and bring in someone else.

Let the new manager start again with the useless, lazy, cowardly players staying on because it can't possibly be them! Has to be the manager and if he can't turn them into decent players with some bottle after one season then he's clearly shit. Just keep going through managers that way until finally we're calling Big Sam to bail us out.
Click to expand...

We don't have a diabolical squad. It's considerably better than the likes of Brighton and Newcastle, yet their manager is getting more than they should from their squad.
 
People turned on Mourinho after he managed EL and second place. Fans also turned on Ole after his shitty season. Same will happen with ETH.

If we dont get top 4, lesser players will come and same shit will happen. He is far from the level of Pep and Klopp too, nothing proves he is even close.
 
Sacking him would be crazy, hes made plenty of mistakes especially the weghorst experiment but all managers have made plenty in their 1st season.

I think there were 9 players in the squad on Sunday from the mourinho, lvg and ole days and we all know what happened there.Of those 9 only Shaw and Rashford and maybe Lindeloff as a back up are worth keeping.

We've had some truly embarrassing results but some very good ones but on the whole i think hes done well under some very difficult circumstances.Im really interested to see what happens this summer how much of the deadwood we get rid of and who we bring in.

Personally, I'd rather win the FA Cup than finish 4th(although i accept this helps with getting your targets)but we could end up doing both which I think most of us would've been delighted with at the start of the season.
 
Yagami said:
Now this could be an interesting poll.

I'd take winning the FA Cup final vs City over top 4 any day.
Click to expand...

Logically top 4 should be paramount but, if we are in the position to stop a City treble, then maybe it’s worth it.
 
Andersonson said:
People turned on Mourinho after he managed EL and second place. Fans also turned on Ole after his shitty season. Same will happen with ETH.

If we dont get top 4, lesser players will come and same shit will happen. He is far from the level of Pep and Klopp too, nothing proves he is even close.
Click to expand...
Don't think this is how it went down. They turned on him when he decided to throw a hissy fit when the club (wrongly, IMO) decided to not back him more after the 2nd place finish. It was a bad move by the club but Jose abandoned his job to get himself fired.

As far as ETH, he is not on their level, no. But he's the first manager we've had post-Fergie who has shown signs of ability and willingness to take on the massive task of managing this club under our current owners. It hasn't been perfect and may yet end in falling short. But for a first year manager in a new league, coming to a club in the absolute pits, he's shown he's worth backing further to give him a chance to compete against the best managers in the league. We've come a long way under him already.
 
kidbob said:
Meh Eddie Howe has done more for Newcastle with lesser players and budget. De Zerbi the same for Brighton while losing Trossard. He's done well but if he fails to get top 4 then he is a failure and should be sacked.
Click to expand...
Revan said:
Nope. They have a net spent of 156M (total spent of 164M), United have a net spent of 203M (total spent of 215M). We also started with a far better squad (3.6 average position in the last 3 years for us compared to 12 for Newcastle).

https://www.squawka.com/en/premier-league-net-spend-2022-23/
Click to expand...
It helps when you have competent higher ups, and don't wait till the last month of the transfer season to actually start doing their work. Fairly certain if we had Newcastle's upper management, we would have saved at least 40 million on Antony alone, but hey let's put the club's ineptitude in the transfer market on Ten Hag.

King7Eric said:
You've hit the nail right on the head. The aim for every top club ( Man Utd, City, Real, Barca etc) should always to be the best team in the land. Trophies should be a consequence of being the best, not an isolated occurrence. I mean Leicester won the FA Cup 2 years ago and they are about to be relegated. The reason being that win was not a result of sustained excellence, but rather a result of 6-7 good games

My biggest gripe with the club ( and this comes back to the owners at the end of the day and something Gary Neville keeps repeating but people keep making fun of him) is that Utd have lost the desire to have sustained excellence and become dependent on finding a fix for each season/situation as it comes along. Winning the League Cup or Europa League is not indicative of sustained excellence. As you say we need players and staff who are going to be excellent 30-31 out of 38 games. We just don't have that personnel and unless the leadership of this club pulls in that direction, we aren't ever going to be back to the top.
Click to expand...

Hate to break to you mate, but we aren't even close to Real, Barca or City. We've dropped down at least 1 tier if not 2 in the last 6-7 years. The only thing keeping us relevant is our commercial success. Once the money dries out, it's not going to look pretty.
 
MoskvaRed said:
Logically top 4 should be paramount but, if we are in the position to stop a City treble, then maybe it’s worth it.
Click to expand...
The things I factor in are:

As you say, stopping a potential City treble. Though, even if they weren't on course for one (say Madrid knock them out), winning a derby in a final will be amazing.

Also, I don't think top 4 is the be all and end all. Being realistic, we're not going to win the CL next year, and we can still build a title challenging team outside of it. City did it in the early 2010s, Liverpool did it, Arsenal are doing it now. There are plenty of press resistant players out there we can buy without champions league football. We just have to actually use our scouts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.