Enigma_87
You know who
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 27,995
With Bergomi and Ferri already in as a proved partnership, we bring someone who can also keep Vialli company:
Attilio Lombardo
Attilio Lombardo
It doesn't say no subs either. Nor does it explain how matches are won or lost. Definition of peak is also rarely alluded to unless the theme calls for it. Same for semifinalists not voting in each other's matches.Perhaps, but it should've been noted from the off in the OP as we're in round 8 and it probably already could have affected some of the picks in round 7.
With Bergomi and Ferri already in as a proved partnership, we bring someone who can also keep Vialli company:
Attilio Lombardo
About feckin' time. He was the one I said I would shoehorn as CM if he kept getting ignored.With Bergomi and Ferri already in as a proved partnership, we bring someone who can also keep Vialli company:
Attilio Lombardo
aye, not too fussed just bringing it up now rather than late.It doesn't say no subs either. Nor does it explain how matches are won or lost. Definition of peak is also rarely alluded to unless the theme calls for it. Same for semifinalists not voting in each other's matches.
Everything that changes and becomes customary for a few drafts becomes norm unless otherwise stated.
about fecking time, better then half of the players that were picked before him.
Well we were considering him from couple of rounds, but the LB and forward became bigger priorities as positions. Glad he lasted, great player indeed.About feckin' time. He was the one I said I would shoehorn as CM if he kept getting ignored.
thought I had double posted. Yet, there was @green_smiley suggesting him as a bald sheep and the two of us going WTF?, may need some selling but won't be particularly hard.about fecking time, better then half of the players that were picked before him.
I didn't ask that. I asked whether in the OP we could lay out how our subs would/could be used. That avoids any "quick-fixing" but lays out a clearer gameplan (e.g. if I'm ahead X comes on for Y to shut things down, or Z comes on to exploit his pace as we switch to counterattacking, etc).No subs allowed.
With Bergomi and Ferri already in as a proved partnership, we bring someone who can also keep Vialli company:
Attilio Lombardo
Balls, I know who you are going for nowYou feckers
Don't see why not.I didn't ask that. I asked whether in the OP we could lay out how our subs would/could be used. That avoids any "quick-fixing" but lays out a clearer gameplan (e.g. if I'm ahead X comes on for Y to shut things down, or Z comes on to exploit his pace as we switch to counterattacking, etc).
Also, please clarify whether draws will be settled by GK rating.
Don't see why not.
And yes, I liked the keeper rule last time so we will go for that again.
sorry mate,just realised!You did didn’t you
You clearly aren't one for nuanced discussions I guess. Go ahead and keep rating people on 7 game peaks then.No worries mate. Cheers.
Stopped taking your posts seriously anyways after 1974 being Jairzinho's level and Rui Costa ahead of Zidane in whatever context
Don't see why not.
And yes, I liked the keeper rule last time so we will go for that again.
Yeah already got some people in mind. Won't be making the decision myself unless it's completely obvious.You will need to get some neutral to draw up a ranking list before hand.
It's not going to be, at all.Yeah already got some people in mind. Won't be making the decision myself unless it's completely obvious.
Well let's hope we don't have a draw. Don't think it happens that often anyway.It's not going to be, at all.
No worries mate. It doesn’t happen that often anyways.sorry mate,just realised!
That's the other reason why it's a better solution. When it was random it meant a lot more people voted to draw the game, be it because they liked penos or thought it was a draw so "voted for one" (through a win vote to the side chasing).Well let's hope we don't have a draw. Don't think it happens that often anyway.
Yeah, agree.That's the other reason why it's a better solution. When it was random it meant a lot more people voted to draw the game, be it because they liked penos or thought it was a draw so "voted for one" (through a win vote to the side chasing).
Both are terrible reasons for a vote.
Balls, I know who you are going for now
Three minds, two picks before me. Don't like my oddsCool, let me know as I am of three minds now
Wow, Zenga was really small (for a goalie)??
- EAP - 1. M. van Basten 2. R. Donadoni 3. M. Tassotti 4. D. Stankovic 5. G. Pessotto 6. T. Brolin 7. M. Ambrosini
- Onenil - 1. R. Baggio 2. A. Costacurta 3. D. Baggio 4. L. Minotti 5. Careca 6. J. Chamot 7. R. Mussi
- harms 1. Ronaldo 2. C. Ferrara 3. P. Montero 4. Y. Djorkaeff 5. C. Seedorf 6. A. Carboni 7. D. Fuser
- Moby/Pat Mustard 1. G. Batistuta 2. F. Cannavaro 3. R. Mancini 4. M. Almeyda 5. E. Chiesa 6. Júlio César 7. D. Platt
- MJJ/Sjor 1. A. Del Piero 2. J. Veron 3. Aldair 4. A. Conte 5. S. Katanec 6. L. Di Biagio 7. T. Helveg
- 2mufc0/Invictus 1. Z. Zidane 2. P. Vierchowod 3. Z. Boban 4. O. Bierhoff 5. J. Angloma 6. R. Jarni 7. F. Ravanelli
- Lord Sinister 1. P. Maldini 2. G. Signori 3. A. Winter 4. V. Montella 5. M. Torricelli 6. Leonardo 7. M. Carrera
- Gio/Theon 1. F. Baresi 2. G. Weah 3. D. Deschamps 4. P. Sousa 5. R. Sosa 6. G. Giannini 7. L. De Agostini 8. W. Zenga
- Enigma/The Red Viper 1. L. Matthäus 2. G. Bergomi 3. G. Vialli 4. R. Ferri 5. Dunga 6. Branco 7. A. Balbo 8. A. Lombardo
- idmanager 1. F. Rijkaard 2. E. Davids 3. H. Crespo 4. A. Di Livio 5. R. Ayala 6. M. Salas 7. G. Favalli 8. A. Recoba
- antohan 1. M. Rui Costa 2. J. Kohler 3. A. Benarrivo 4. S. Mihajlovic 5. R. Sensini 6. C. Caniggia 7. Alemão 8. A. Peruzzi
- prath92/Crappy 1. P. Nedved 2. C. Vieri 3. D. Albertini 4. D. Savicevic 5. M. Iuliano 6. P. Ince 7. A. Fortunato 8. P. Negro
- Tuppet 1. R. Gullit 2. A. Brehme 3. L. Blanc 4. T. Hassler 5. R. Voller 6. N. Berti 7. D. Petrescu 8. E. Scifo
- Cal? 1. M. Desailly 2. F. Totti 3. J. Klinsmann 4. C. Panucci 5. G Zambrotta 6. A Pirlo 7. G Lentini 8. G. Gattuso
- Oaencha 1. A. Nesta 2. J. Zanetti 3. G. Zola 4. F. Inzaghi 5. V. Candela 6. A. Tacchinardi 7. G. Pagliuca 8. H. Nakata
@Lord SInister
- Raees 1. Cafu 2. L. Thuram 3. D. Simeone 4. V. Jugovic 5. F. Couto 6. A. Möller 7. G. Buffon 8. E. Francescoli
You clearly aren't one for nuanced discussions I guess. Go ahead and keep rating people on 7 game peaks then.
Can I just say you are lucky that not everyone here has known your mischievous activities over the years. Antohan lecturing others on why it's terrible to vote for someone to engineer a result.That's the other reason why it's a better solution. When it was random it meant a lot more people voted to draw the game, be it because they liked penos or thought it was a draw so "voted for one" (through a win vote to the side chasing).
Both are terrible reasons for a vote.
No worries mate. Cheers.
Stopped taking your posts seriously anyways after 1974 being Jairzinho's level and Rui Costa ahead of Zidane in whatever context
A peak Zidane no less.
Eh, what?Can I just say you are lucky that not everyone here has known your mischievous activities over the years. Antohan lecturing others on why it's terrible to vote for someone to engineer a result.
Had a right chuckle when you of all people had the nerve to pull out posts from a draft that happened 6 years ago. The irony.
A peak Zidane no less.
The best of the lot was Van Bommel should be alright against Maradona.
But the Jairzinho one cracked me the most. I am sure he'd say 2007 was Ronaldinho's level if the opposition had him.
I am hoping Rui Costa having a better decade than Baggio happens too
Re: Jairzinho, since you guys are so adept at making compilations, I challenge you to make a Jairzinho compilation excluding the 1970 WC where he looks any better than, say, Leroy Sane.
Aye mate. Your integrity, non-hypocrisy and unbiased opinion seems to be well documented here. My apologies.You realise none of those things you go on about involve a game of mine?
Funny. I was making the point Zidane's peak over the decade was short (98-00) while Rui Costa performed consistently at a high level for half the decade.
The essence of it really was the whole discussion about how long a peak is needed and whether being more influential longer carried weight.