After this performance I can't help but feel that if Romero (or any decent goalies, tbh) also had to play behind a shaky defense and an incompetent midfield (that provides zero-to-none cover and quick to give the ball away) like how De Gea did in previous seasons he would have probably done just as well. This is probably a (very) knee-jerk judgment but I do think DG was overrated, in terms of how well he performed when played along not-so-good defenders, simply because the goalkeeper would certainly have many more opportunities to stand out if he had to deal with a large number of dangerous situations. Not that the praise was undeserved, of course, but like in the last match majority of the shots came straight at the goalie and in some way expected to be saved (positioning! yeah I know, but to be fair isn't getting in the right position what decent goalkeepers anywhere should be capable of?! The penalty save was inexcusably great though, but penalties have always been more of a mind gambling game). To be more straightforward, I think the main reason why DG (during that period, and Romero yesterday) received such recognition was because we played like a mid-table team, unable to organize attacks from behind and constantly letting our goalkeeper shine against their shooting practice. Always make me sad that United in recent years give so much spotlight to goalkeepers and yet unable to retain their loyalty, as if allowing them to succeed through our defensive weakness is not such a good idea after all. (*sigh*)