kirk buttercup
Full Member
Cool . John O shea has a few more Premier league medals than Stevie GThe Spanish John O'Shea.
Cool . John O shea has a few more Premier league medals than Stevie GThe Spanish John O'Shea.
I gave you examples of what I spoke of as well as the full context of transfers in/out of Spain
It's always possible that Sergi has negotiated terms with United behind Barcelona's back but if it were to be revealed, club would look it at as a hostile bid regardless - hence, the fee would have to go up as explained earlier. It's why it's best to deal with the club first with respect to the fee, then player as it is easiest.
In any event, if the bid is true I am skeptical that the player has already agreed terms as I mentioned in the OP
It is very naive to think that clubs activate clauses and hope that the players agrees to sign.
Agents are contacted in various ways before clubs enter negotiations.
Less naive then thinking by agreeing personal terms that the deal is anywhere close to halfway done
Yeah noone meets the release clause without knowing the player wants to come. If its true, hes already said yes.
Every chance barca allowed us to talk to him as well. No reason to suggest it was done in secret.
You should talk to Barca board then, that's how they are trying to sign Dembele and Coutinho.
If that were the case, the deal would be closed already
@FCBarca And what's the supposed difference between a release clause in Spain and England? Legally, you're supposed to negotiate with the club before talking to the player. In both countries, nobody does that though.
If a release clause is met, the player is automatically bought out of his contract and the selling club can't do a thing about it, just like with Neymar.
I've already pointed out, just like with Verratti, that agreeing personal terms means very little in a transfer. My board is shite, that too is nothing new
How was Nsymar signed? By triggering clause and then agreeing personal terms or agreeing personal terms and then triggering clause?
Players don't have to sign contract with new club, at least if they are ready to move and agree general terms then only buying club will make a move. Not sure why such a simple concept is so hard to understand.
No club will trigger the clause of lols, this isn't Football manager.
Wasn't that simple in the end though, was it - Neymar had to pay the fee himself else PSG would have to pay closer to 300 million.
It's different in Spain and this has been talked about many times before
Wasn't that simple in the end though, was it - Neymar had to pay the fee himself else PSG would have to pay closer to 300 million.
It's different in Spain and this has been talked about many times before
It's irrelevant who pays. The point is, a release clause works the same way, as in it can be paid to void a contract without the selling club being able to do anything about it. Sure, they can reject it but it wouldn't hold up in a court.
No one knows for certain how the Neymar deal went down as many theories are out there. The prevailing one that makes most sense to me is that the player & father offered themselves to PSG which began the process. PSG attempted to negotiate the fee/transfer by coupling it to players and because Verratti was off the table, Barcelona refused to budge on the tax aspect (Rising to 300 million). It forced Neymar to come up with the 222 himself, how FFP, FIFA et al deal with where & how he got that sum is likely to be the subject of some investigation in the future
The Spanish John O'Shea.
Yeah that rule was changed a while ago. We paid out Herrera's clause.Clubs don't have to pay taxes on buyout clauses in Spain anymore.
PSG themselves went to pay the clause and that's when La Liga refused to play ball.
OP seems to be outdated.
Less naive then thinking by agreeing personal terms that the deal is anywhere close to halfway done
FC Barcelona statement on transfer:
"On Thursday afternoon Neymar Jr's legal representatives visited in person the club's offices and made the payment of €222m in the player's name with regards to the unilateral termination of the contract that united both parties.
"As such, the club will pass on to UEFA the details of the above operation so that they can determine the disciplinary responsibilities that may arise from this case."
Their are culpable simply because his buy out clause is too easily reachable.Board won't have anything to do with it specifically related to Roberto as the player would need to decide (I am skeptical he would agree to leave). However, the board is absolutely culpable for the state of affairs at the club which has led to an exodus of cantera players and possibly 1st teamers
I gave you examples of what I spoke of as well as the full context of transfers in/out of Spain
It's always possible that Sergi has negotiated terms with United behind Barcelona's back but if it were to be revealed, club would look it at as a hostile bid regardless - hence, the fee would have to go up as explained earlier. It's why it's best to deal with the club first with respect to the fee, then player as it is easiest.
In any event, if the bid is true I am skeptical that the player has already agreed terms as I mentioned in the OP
Moreover, trusted local reporter Gerard Romero has linked Sergi to Chelsea as well which suggests that opposing clubs are looking to tempt club/player due to all the uncertainty at Barcelona with respect to the midfield. Probably why Pep & City have been linked as well and in no link has rumours appeared on personal terms being met by any party
The fee would go higher than the release clause?
Their are culpable simply because his buy out clause is too easily reachable.
The fee would go higher than the release clause?
So PSG gave money to Neymar to terminate the contract, simple as that. He agreed to move to PSG before they triggered the clause, which was the initial point.
One, if PSG gave the money to Neymar to terminate the contract that will be investigated as it would be taxable and leave PSG open to other consequences after an investigation is done. I am certain the story of Neymar's transfer is not over, there is more to come.
Two, it was not your initial point as the implication was that PSG negotiated with the player first when I suggested that it was the player who approached PSG to exit - not the same thing.
The Spanish tax authority confirmed last year that there is no tax to be paid on a release clause payment made at a player's request by a club, whether that's a Spanish club or another EU one. It's been the actual practice for several years, but there was always a worry that the tax office could come looking for the money, because the law was ambiguous.
It won't. There is a good explanation from Sportwitness on the rule change.
Would Barca receive a fee higher than the release clause or are you implying that the purchasing club would have to pay a amount higher than the release clause because of tax implications on the transfer?