Member 58925
Guest
Where’s @FCBarcelona to continue his riveting lectures about cheating in football?
Denmark was a bit of a darling for the neutrals Id say, with what happened with Erikssen. Though perhaps a lot of people dislike you lot. I don't mind England really. You have shit weather and shit food. We're like brothers.And he was calling us English hypocrites. Can you believe it? I really don't get all this hate. I could understand it if we was a successful team and won everything, but we don't.
Why is no one mentioning the free kick foul. That was never in a million years a foul. Those challenges get let go 10 times a game.
Yeah Hjulmand is incredible. I think we have a genuine shot at having a decent wc run as well.
The better team lost tonight to a team of diving rats.
Hopefully Italy win 1-0 in the final with a clearly offside goal or dodgy penalty against yous.
And what if England win?The better team lost tonight to a team of diving rats.
Hopefully Italy win 1-0 in the final with a clearly offside goal or dodgy penalty against yous.
The better looking team lost. Handsome feckers.England were by far the best team. Denmark stopped attacking very early in the game.
Wow go to bed you sad bitter fool.The better team lost tonight to a team of diving rats.
Hopefully Italy win 1-0 in the final with a clearly offside goal or dodgy penalty against yous.
Monday off and you fecked it up, Monday off any you fecked it upThe better team lost tonight to a team of diving rats.
Hopefully Italy win 1-0 in the final with a clearly offside goal or dodgy penalty against yous.
*Clears throat* Busquets vs Inter, Capdevilla vs Portugal, surrounding the referee to get RVP sent off in the CL, and the playacting that manufactured the Swiss players’ red card in this tournament. Take your stones back to your glass house and go cry there.
The better looking team lost. Handsome feckers.
Pickford looked shit scared all game. I thought he'd chuck the ball into his own net eventually but he pulled through, the poor bastard.
You are mentioning doubtful plays in best case scenario (aside from disgusting Busquets). I have seen a bunch of important decisions waaaay worse than that, for example just in NT championships in the last 30 years:
- 1996: EC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against England (lost on pens).
- 1994: WC QFs... minute 90, Tassotti breaks Luis Enrique's nose in the area... Baggio scores in the counter (2-1). Tassotti was later sanctioned 8 games due to the extreme violence shown. First (and unique) time in history that FIFA did this in a WC.
- 2002: WC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against South Korea and a never ending list of fouls, lost on pens. Italy was blatantly robbed before too.
I could make a bigger lists of wrong decisions (for example in WC 2010 our goal against Portugal is an offside close call, Paraguay committed a clear penalty that was not sanctioned, De Jong foul to Xabi Alonso in the final, etc.), but either way are difficult to call, only "one" during the game without VAR, etc.
At least 2002 was a bribe 100%. It is impossible to happen by random. Italy suffered the same in the previous round.
However... there were no VAR. VAR is designed specifically for cases like this.
It is difficult to explain that you give a penalty without any contact in a EC semifinal. You can be doubtful about the red against Switzerland (it is too harsh to me but it is a clear and dangerous foul so the red is not out of question), but you cannot have any doubt with that penalty, sorry. It is a blatant dive.There is no doubt. It makes no sense not to overturn the decision.
This is like comparing tennis in 1980s with some wrong decisions vs using the hawk-eye and make a wrong decision either way. It is not comparable at all.
Sure it’s not a pen. And their free kick?You are mentioning doubtful plays in best case scenario (aside from disgusting Busquets). I have seen a bunch of important decisions waaaay worse than that, for example just in NT championships in the last 30 years:
- 1996: EC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against England (lost on pens).
- 1994: WC QFs... minute 90, Tassotti breaks Luis Enrique's nose in the area... Baggio scores in the counter (2-1). Tassotti was later sanctioned 8 games due to the extreme violence shown. First (and unique) time in history that FIFA did this in a WC.
- 2002: WC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against South Korea and a never ending list of fouls, lost on pens. Italy was blatantly robbed before too.
I could make a bigger lists of wrong decisions (for example in WC 2010 our goal against Portugal is an offside close call, Paraguay committed a clear penalty that was not sanctioned, De Jong foul to Xabi Alonso in the final, etc.), but either way are difficult to call, only "one" during the game without VAR, etc.
At least 2002 was a bribe 100%. It is impossible to happen by random. Italy suffered the same in the previous round.
However... there were no VAR. VAR is designed specifically for cases like this.
It is difficult to explain that you give a penalty without any contact in a EC semifinal. You can be doubtful about the red against Switzerland (it is too harsh to me but it is a clear and dangerous foul so the red is not out of question), but you cannot have any doubt with that penalty, sorry. It is a blatant dive.There is no doubt. It makes no sense not to overturn the decision. Imagine that there is VAR and Lampard's goal against Germany is not conceded. What would you think?
This is like comparing tennis in 1980s with some wrong decisions vs using the hawk-eye and make a wrong decision either way. It is not comparable at all.
They had tried to assemble a british team at Olympic but still failed miserably.The amount of luck in game and in getting a draw of the century with shit teams and still scraping through because of own goals and a dodgy pen.
If england can't win it now then disband the national team and try out a british team with england, scotland, wales and northern ireland.
You are mentioning doubtful plays in best case scenario (aside from disgusting Busquets). I have seen a bunch of important decisions waaaay worse than that, for example just in NT championships in the last 30 years:
- 1996: EC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against England (lost on pens).
- 1994: WC QFs... minute 90, Tassotti breaks Luis Enrique's nose in the area... Baggio scores in the counter (2-1). Tassotti was later sanctioned 8 games due to the extreme violence shown. First (and unique) time in history that FIFA did this in a WC.
- 2002: WC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against South Korea and a never ending list of fouls, lost on pens. Italy was blatantly robbed before too.
I could make a bigger lists of wrong decisions (for example in WC 2010 our goal against Portugal is an offside close call, Paraguay committed a clear penalty that was not sanctioned, De Jong foul to Xabi Alonso in the final, etc.), but either way are difficult to call, only "one" during the game without VAR, etc.
At least 2002 was a bribe 100%. It is impossible to happen by random. Italy suffered the same in the previous round.
However... there were no VAR. VAR is designed specifically for cases like this.
It is difficult to explain that you give a penalty without any contact in a EC semifinal. You can be doubtful about the red against Switzerland (it is too harsh to me but it is a clear and dangerous foul so the red is not out of question), but you cannot have any doubt with that penalty, sorry. It is a blatant dive.There is no doubt. It makes no sense not to overturn the decision. Imagine that there is VAR and Lampard's goal against Germany is not conceded. What would you think?
This is like comparing tennis in 1980s with some wrong decisions vs using the hawk-eye and make a wrong decision either way. It is not comparable at all.
We've not been in a major final for 55 years. Most of us have never even seen us play in a final, and you get salty cnuts on here trying to dismiss what we have achieved.
Where has he been this Euro ? Where was he against Villareal ? He’s been largely awful for 6 months or more. Glad you’ve got more faith than I have because Rashford is no kid anymore, he’s an experienced footballer and if he’s to reach the heights of a genuinely great player, for club and country, then he needs to get his skates on.
He is a good - perhaps very good on occasions - player but that’s nothing like good enough for international level and I’d argue it isn’t good for a club who’s benchmark should be excellence on a more consistent level than Rashford seems capable of.
I hope England cheat their way to a penalty in the 90th minute with the game at 0-0. Kane steps up, hits the bar and the rebound goes all the way down the other side of the pitch on into Pickford's net. Then Marco Tardelli runs across the pitch celebrating.
How such a pathetic penalty can decide a semi-final of a major international tournament in the age of VAR beggars belief. Denmark weren't up to much anymore at that point but I never like seeing a nation being gifted the match. That's exactly what happened.
You are mentioning doubtful plays in best case scenario (aside from disgusting Busquets). I have seen a bunch of important decisions waaaay worse than that, for example just in NT championships in the last 30 years:
- 1996: EC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against England (lost on pens).
- 1994: WC QFs... minute 90, Tassotti breaks Luis Enrique's nose in the area... Baggio scores in the counter (2-1). Tassotti was later sanctioned 8 games due to the extreme violence shown. First (and unique) time in history that FIFA did this in a WC.
- 2002: WC QFs... 2 legal goals disallowed against South Korea and a never ending list of fouls, lost on pens. Italy was blatantly robbed before too.
I could make a bigger lists of wrong decisions (for example in WC 2010 our goal against Portugal is an offside close call, Paraguay committed a clear penalty that was not sanctioned, De Jong foul to Xabi Alonso in the final, etc.), but either way are difficult to call, only "one" during the game without VAR, etc.
At least 2002 was a bribe 100%. It is impossible to happen by random. Italy suffered the same in the previous round.
However... there were no VAR. VAR is designed specifically for cases like this.
It is difficult to explain that you give a penalty without any contact in a EC semifinal. You can be doubtful about the red against Switzerland (it is too harsh to me but it is a clear and dangerous foul so the red is not out of question), but you cannot have any doubt with that penalty, sorry. It is a blatant dive.There is no doubt. It makes no sense not to overturn the decision. Imagine that there is VAR and Lampard's goal against Germany is not conceded. What would you think?
This is like comparing tennis in 1980s with some wrong decisions vs using the hawk-eye and make a wrong decision either way. It is not comparable at all.
Salt I think you're just so desperate for any success that you cannot accept you were given the final on a plate. Just like the whole tournament playing at home
Bit sad.
You must be at least a little bit active, some lunatic made you a scout.Too many posts to answer. I never claimed portuguese players don't dive. When I was active in this board I would criticize that behavior all the time. The same can't be said about the usual hypocrisy of English media and supporters . You telling me that if England had that penalty against them there wouldn't be incessant whining?
Already told that England was the best team and deserved to win in the end. To be honest if I had to bet in the final I would bet on England winning on ET.
I don't mind England either although we have better weather and food. I'm usually always against Spain and ItalyDenmark was a bit of a darling for the neutrals Id say, with what happened with Erikssen. Though perhaps a lot of people dislike you lot. I don't mind England really. You have shit weather and shit food. We're like brothers.
Why are England fans not allowed to be happy and celebrate our team finally getting to a final?
The salt is astonishing, we’ve not won anything in most of our lifetimes !!
There are some quality players in scotland, wales and ireland that could be the difference.
I don't mind England either although we have better weather and food. I'm usually always against Spain and Italy
Must have been the same lunatic that promoted you. Calm down and enjoy the final.You must be at least a little bit active, some lunatic made you a scout.
HahaWow go to bed you sad bitter fool.
And who have italy played? Belgium? They scrapped past spain who struggled against Croatia. Is it our fault Czech Republic beat the Netherlands or Spain couldn't win thier group.People are only pointing out that you all go around pretending your the dogs bollocks after playing all major teams off the pitch whilst the reality is that england have:
1. Got the best draw of all the countries not only in the group stage but in the knockouts till the final.
2. Home advantage
3. Scrapping through against weak teams
4. Getting gifted own goals and dodgy pens
Yes your in the final, enjoy it
Too many posts to answer. I never claimed portuguese players don't dive. When I was active in this board I would criticize that behavior all the time. The same can't be said about the usual hypocrisy of English media and supporters .
66 wasn't it? Pretty much yes, then.Of course we're desperate for success, we've been waiting our entire lives some bizarre folk on here.