I know people are going to disagree with you, taking the Top Red route, but this is pretty much bang on. I don't think he's a Forest Green player per se, but he's very limited in certain key regards.
Take someone like Ross Barkley, just moved to Luton. RB's a better player in almost every sense, except for the injury record, but many people (including some supporting retaining McT or de facto retaining) would understandably be in minor uproar if we signed him. Barkley's faults, in terms of positioning and certain forms of off the ball awareness, are Scott's, but McT doesn't have Barkley's creativity/ability to break the lines with anything but running, or willingness to take the ball in tight areas. Neither of them are great tacklers and so on, but at least Barkley doesn't masquerade as a 6 amongst his other positions. You put either in a team with lower expectations where they can just run about and drive with the ball, often get turned over and then have a team-mate recover it, take potshots, attack the ball at setpieces etc, and they'll do Ok. It's why we can't use McT's Scotland form as a way of defending his retention...