Sean_RedDevil
Twitter bot
Yes but so far he has played mainly as left-back for Stuttgart and he has played in this position for the Chelsea/England youth teams too.Isn’t Clinton Mola a central midfielder?
Yes but so far he has played mainly as left-back for Stuttgart and he has played in this position for the Chelsea/England youth teams too.Isn’t Clinton Mola a central midfielder?
I don't think he will, he'll get a few years to keep developing his craft and will leave if Arsenal haven't progressed, they'll sell if a player kicks up a fuss.He'll regret that.
He'll regret that.
He won’t, the alternative is being a bench option at a better performing club in his most crucial development years. He’s probably the only Arsenal player capable of an England call-up.
ThisIndeed. Arsenal is probably the perfect club for him at this point in terms of level.
Another young player who will stagnate at Arsenal. Who since Fabregas hasn't done that? Argument for Bellerin, I think.
Is there really a list of Arsenal youngsters that have stagnated since Cesc?Another young player who will stagnate at Arsenal. Who since Fabregas hasn't done that? Argument for Bellerin, I think.
He’ll play basically every game for the next 2-3 seasons. Injuries permitting, and if he maintains his trajectory, he’ll end up somewhere bigger by 21.Another young player who will stagnate at Arsenal. Who since Fabregas hasn't done that? Argument for Bellerin, I think.
Ffs that got me.God, he's short isn't he
Chamberlain and Walcott are Arsenal products? Like we say Pogba is ours. In reality, we both know that's not the case.Is there really a list of Arsenal youngsters that have stagnated since Cesc?
Wilshere had injury issues, hardly Wenger or the club's fault but other than that I can't think of any. You might say Gibbs but he was never that good from the offset.
Iwobi and Chamberlain both got lots of game time, got a taste of winning trophies and ended up attracting fees of £40M each, with the latter winning the CL and PL.
Szczesny developed well, got a taste of winning trophies and then moved onto better things and only really left because we signed Cech.
I guess I could give you Walcott but he scored over 100 goals for us as a winger and helped us win 3 FA Cups, even scoring in a final.
Chamberlain and Walcott are Arsenal products? Like we say Pogba is ours. In reality, we both know that's not the case.
Yeah, better him staying put than going to a top team where we'd have no chance of signing him. Hopefully we try later down the road.Wanted him at United, but we were never even linked, so this makes me happiest. Huge talent, and from what I see, he’s already Arsenal’s best player.
All jokes aside with the Greenwood tweet do we think the two are comparable at all? As in would it be fair to ask who will end up being the better player? Seems some Arsenal fans are certain that Saka is the better talent. Is this just a case of fans being typically bias or is it possible to make reasonable arguments either way.
All jokes aside with the Greenwood tweet do we think the two are comparable at all? As in would it be fair to ask who will end up being the better player? Seems some Arsenal fans are certain that Saka is the better talent. Is this just a case of fans being typically bias or is it possible to make reasonable arguments either way.
All jokes aside with the Greenwood tweet do we think the two are comparable at all? As in would it be fair to ask who will end up being the better player? Seems some Arsenal fans are certain that Saka is the better talent. Is this just a case of fans being typically bias or is it possible to make reasonable arguments either way.
Yeah it's not so much that Saka isn't good and more that Greenwood looks elite. Saka is basically Arsenal's best player at 18 so you'd expect pretty much world class potential. But Greenwood looks like he can go beyond even world class.Saka has been really good but there isn’t really a comparison here as to who the better talent is.
I don't know how you'd even compare them.All jokes aside with the Greenwood tweet do we think the two are comparable at all? As in would it be fair to ask who will end up being the better player? Seems some Arsenal fans are certain that Saka is the better talent. Is this just a case of fans being typically bias or is it possible to make reasonable arguments either way.
I don't know how you'd even compare them.
Saka has played as a LB, CM, and a winger and looked very promising in all 3 positions, at only 18 years of age. I don't think we even know what his best position is going to be yet.
Greenwood is a forward who is extremely comfortable using either foot and looks like he can create goals out of nothing.
Neither of them has played a full season of first team football yet, so anyone who's already trying to make definitive statements over which one ends up being better is a muppet. In my opinion.
I don't know how you'd even compare them.
Saka has played as a LB, CM, and a winger and looked very promising in all 3 positions, at only 18 years of age. I don't think we even know what his best position is going to be yet.
Greenwood is a forward who is extremely comfortable using either foot and looks like he can create goals out of nothing.
Neither of them has played a full season of first team football yet, so anyone who's already trying to make definitive statements over which one ends up being better is a muppet. In my opinion.
Was Saka highly rated much before breaking into the first team?