Sadio Mané

Status
Not open for further replies.
See thats thing, we dont need another player who is better at scoring than creating. We need a player who will want the ball all the time, have very good link up play, never lose possession and have an eye for a pass. Most of the players that fit into that description are not "pacey tricky goal scorers".

I dont know if theres another player out there like Silva, be we need to sign that guy.

You've just described Mata and our attack doesn't need more players looking the ball to into feet, we need cutting edge.

We don't have that kind of time to wait around for yet ANOTHER young talent to fulfill its potential.
We are already waiting with
-Depay
-Martial(until proven otherwise)
-Januzaj
-Shaw
-Wilson
Meanwhile, although Rooney's overall play is improving, he is still under performing. Our only consistent player right now is Mata and even at that due to his inability to be a traditional winner (no pace, passive) he may be prone to being ineffective particularly against teams that park the bus.

I am ecstatic we have all these enticing young talents in our team with incredible potential, but we can't rely on them to consistently deliver for us all the time. We need a PROVEN and VETERAN attacking talent who can take the load off of our prospects, and can ease their developing process.

Mane hasn't reached his potential and he's still an improvement on what we have, just because he's not 27 doesn't mean he'd be a buy buy.

He's not better than either Rooney or Mata. Martial and Depay deserve a chance to prove themselves.

He's miles ahead of Rooney and certainly better than Mata on the wing, he wouldn't be taking the place of Martial or Depay.
 
I still think he will never be good enough to win you a CL. Solid squad player who can contribute to winning PL titles.
 
You've just described Mata and our attack doesn't need more players looking the ball to into feet, we need cutting edge.

I didn't, I described Silva, and if you think Mata and Silva are alike then that,s another discussion. A person who creates chances is the cutting edge.
 
Mane hasn't reached his potential and he's still an improvement on what we have, just because he's not 27 doesn't mean he'd be a buy buy.
No he isn't.
He isn't a better striker than what we have.
He isn't a better play maker than what we have.
He is not a better winger than what we have, albeit he would be a nice alternative when Mata is ineffective.
 
No he isn't.
He isn't a better striker than what we have.
He isn't a better play maker than what we have.
He is not a better winger than what we have, albeit he would be a nice alternative when Mata is ineffective.

Messi isn't a better defender than Smalling, that means he's crap and wouldn't improve us.

Of course he isn't a better fecking striker or playmaker, he isn't even a striker or a playmaker. And Mane at present is better than any of our wingers.
 
Mane and the current flavour of the month Mahrez along with Bolasie remind me of players like Okocha and Di Canio, good entertainers for mid table teams.
 
He's not better than either Rooney or Mata. Martial and Depay deserve a chance to prove themselves.
You must be really kidding me, he's different player in the first place, if we consider playing Rooney as no10 than Mane's comfortably better at the position, I also think he would be effective from wide for us, he could be an upgrade on both Depay and Mata, the first is fairly inconsistent (nobody doubts his potential) Mata is a player who is effective but hides himself too much too often in this system, Mane would add the drive so much needed..

And he might also be a good little striker, he has bags of goals in him although he's not typical no9, he could be good cover for Martial or horrible Rooney who will play all the time never mind his form..
 
I am ecstatic we have all these enticing young talents in our team with incredible potential, but we can't rely on them to consistently deliver for us all the time. We need a PROVEN and VETERAN attacking talent who can take the load off of our prospects, and can ease their developing process.

I can see your point but what proven and veteran player do you think we can sign in January? They are few and far between! And given how we are doing in the league at the moment I'd suggest that a fresh signing to give us pace on the right would be a welcome addition.
 
We shouldn't make the mistake of buying players just for the sake of it and just because he is slightly better than what we have currently, that's what Liverpool have been doing and look how that's worked out for them!
I would rather we spend a little bit extra and bring in a world class player (Griezman/Reus for example) or take a punt on a player that is potentially world class (Memphis/Martial).

Basically I agree with what Invictus has been saying, without being nearly as eloquent
 
Messi isn't a better defender than Smalling, that means he's crap and wouldn't improve us.

Of course he isn't a better fecking striker or playmaker, he isn't even a striker or a playmaker. And Mane at present is better than any of our wingers.
What kind of analogy is that? they don't even play the same position.
If he isn't a better striker or playmaker then why would we even get him then? Mane is not better than any of our wide players and even if he was by a margin does not mean we should get him.
 
I can see your point but what proven and veteran player do you think we can sign in January? They are few and far between! And given how we are doing in the league at the moment I'd suggest that a fresh signing to give us pace on the right would be a welcome addition.
If we need pace on the right then why shouldn't we play Lingard, Wilson, Peirera or Januzaj there?
 
What kind of analogy is that? they don't even play the same position.
If he isn't a better striker or playmaker then why would we even get him then? Mane is not better than any of our wide players and even if he was by a margin does not mean we should get him.

Well, Mane doesn't play as striker or playmaker either. He is a winger.

How is he not better than any of our wide players, I mean seriously? Not better than ANY of Valencia, Depay, Young or even Mata who we play as a winger despite him not being a winger?

Then you come to conclusion that even if he was better by a margin than all we have on the wings, it still doesn't mean that we should get him. I am not even sure what I'm reading here because you make below zero sense.
 
Forget Mane lets bring back Welbeck and convince him to only play wide!

Front 3:

Memphis Martial Welbeck

No team could deal with that pace on the counter.
 
Well, Mane doesn't play as striker or playmaker either. He is a winger.

How is he not better than any of our wide players, I mean seriously? Not better than ANY of Valencia, Depay, Young or even Mata who we play as a winger despite him not being a winger?

Then you come to conclusion that even if he was better by a margin than all we have on the wings, it still doesn't mean that we should get him. I am not even sure what I'm reading here because you make below zero sense.
He is also a #10 but fair enough, per whoscored he played almost all of his games on the left and played as a number ten as is secondary position.

We already have Depay. Depay may not be in form right now, but he has far more potential than Mane. He is a project who we would want to keep developing and playing for him to reach his heights. Mane is only slightly better than him at the moment;thus, the difference in the productivity of our offensive play would be marginal as well. Seeing as he can be an inconsistent player aswell, where would be the logic in getting him?

Mane would not displace Mata on the right. Mata is one of our key sources of creativity and play-making as well as goal scoring. Mane would be a very useful back up player to him at best because of his high pressing ability and how he can inject pace and a little more directness into our play whenever Mata is either playing poorly or is ineffective against certain sides.
 
Mane would not displace Mata on the right. Mata is one of our key sources of creativity and play-making as well as goal scoring. Mane would be a very useful back up player to him at best because of his high pressing ability and how he can inject pace and a little more directness into our play whenever Mata is either playing poorly or is ineffective against certain sides.

I actually think Mane has way more potential than Mata as a winger. He doesn't quite have Mata's vision but he is not afraid to take players on and shoot which we desperately lack with Mata. When Mata cuts inside he usually just distributes the ball to the left wing.
 
We shouldn't make the mistake of buying players just for the sake of it and just because he is slightly better than what we have currently, that's what Liverpool have been doing and look how that's worked out for them!
I would rather we spend a little bit extra and bring in a world class player (Griezman/Reus for example) or take a punt on a player that is potentially world class (Memphis/Martial).

Basically I agree with what Invictus has been saying, without being nearly as eloquent

Eloquent enough. You are right.

Martial up front backed up by Rooney
Memphis out left backed up by Young
New RW backed up by Januzaj
Mata or Herrera backed up by the other.

One of Pereira or Wilson around for injuries, late game subs and the cups and the other out on loan getting 35 Prem starts.

Half-measures are a terrible idea.
 
I actually think Mane has way more potential than Mata as a winger. He doesn't quite have Mata's vision but he is not afraid to take players on and shoot which we desperately lack with Mata. When Mata cuts inside he usually just distributes the ball to the left wing.
Potential on the right hand side? Absolutely, but as of right now I don't see him as a better upgrade over him.
 
No he isn't.
He isn't a better striker than what we have.
He isn't a better play maker than what we have.
He is not a better winger than what we have, albeit he would be a nice alternative when Mata is ineffective.

He's clearly better than every winger we have bar Depay. Mata is useless when played in the same side as Rooney since both want to do the same job. We also have a squad with no depth, our attacking options vs Southampton were Young/Fellaini. He was also excellent vs us in the 10 position.
 
I didn't, I described Silva, and if you think Mata and Silva are alike then that,s another discussion. A person who creates chances is the cutting edge.

Silva and Mata are incredibly similar, arguing otherwise is just nonsense. Mata can create chances when he's in his best position at 10 and has players around to compliment his skill set I.E players with pace/skill and who stretch the play. Mane does all of that.
 
Silva and Mata are incredibly similar, arguing otherwise is just nonsense. Mata can create chances when he's in his best position at 10 and has players around to compliment his skill set I.E players with pace/skill and who stretch the play. Mane does all of that.

You can see Silva dictating the pace and direction of the game which may be perhaps his greatest forte. Mata can't quite do that.
 
He's clearly better than every winger we have bar Depay. Mata is useless when played in the same side as Rooney since both want to do the same job. We also have a squad with no depth, our attacking options vs Southampton were Young/Fellaini. He was also excellent vs us in the 10 position.
I would not say Mata is useless, he is very far from being useless.

Our attacking options vs Southampton was not Young/Fellaini;They didn't even play! Depay, Mata, and Martial all delivered against Southampton..

Other than limited end product, Mane was pretty impressive in the 45 minutes I saw him in the #10 position before he switched to the right;however, he is still too inconsistent with his play in other games I see him play and we already have players who are better playmakers than him in that position.
 
You can see Silva dictating the pace and direction of the game which may be perhaps his greatest forte. Mata can't quite do that.

Neither can Silva when he's played on the wing. While Mata was at Chelsea and playing as a 10 he did everything Silva has been doing, stylistically they're incredibly similar.

I would not say Mata is useless, he is very far from being useless.

Our attacking options vs Southampton was not Young/Fellaini;They didn't even play! Depay, Mata, and Martial all delivered against Southampton..

Other than limited end product, Mane was pretty impressive in the 45 minutes I saw him in the #10 position before he switched to the right;however, he is still too inconsistent with his play in other games I see him play and we already have players who are better playmakers than him in that position.

I clearly said he's useless when he's in the same side as Rooney, not that he's useless overall.

Attacking options = the options we have when it's not working. Our attacking options on the bench were Fellaini and Young, both of whom will get significant minutes this season in positions were Mane is clearly better. That's excluding the argument that he's already better than Rooney as a 10 and Mata as a winger.

He was excellent when moved to the right, put in a number of great crosses Southampton could have scored from.
 
Silva and Mata are incredibly similar, arguing otherwise is just nonsense. Mata can create chances when he's in his best position at 10 and has players around to compliment his skill set I.E players with pace/skill and who stretch the play. Mane does all of that.
They aren't incredibly similar. They're actually quite different.
 
Seems so snoby for people to dismiss a player because he doesn't fit the current big names as someone that can't be a very good player for us. Personally think only players that can come even close to winning the CL for a club would be Messi or Ronaldo can be ones to win it all every year. Otherwise if there is a player, like ADM, they are probably great for that season or two. While Reus, Bale, Griezmann would be star players, I don't think they would be the one to win us the CL every year. There is no reason Mane in the right team could not put together a great season or two - he is showing considerable progress and still quite young.

Valencia wasn't seen as a player that would win us the CL but, in those first few years, before he lost all his confidence in taking players on, he was a beast for us and helped us compete to win it all. Mane can be very similar and he doesn't seem to be lacking in confidence. In Memphis we have a player might just be that super star and possibly now Martial. Mane could just be a very good player that gives us that extra speed, pace and goal threat that could make the others shine even more.
 
I don't understand where the vitriol is coming from. Yeah he is not the best possible talent out there that we could get, but he could do a job as a squad player and off the bench for us. Was that not what Young was originally brought in for? To do a job and be a rotation option without there being too big of a drop in talent?

If we had the 3-4 years into the future versions of Adnan and Pereira, coupled with a Nani type, add in another winger and another striker in the squad, I wouldn't advocate his signing. But based on our team RIGHT NOW, with its huge lack of depth, he definitely would be a great option, whether it be off the bench or in the starting XI. Just remember that when we were down to PSV our attackers off the bench were Valencia and Fellaini.
 
Seems so snoby for people to dismiss a player because he doesn't fit the current big names as someone that can't be a very good player for us. Personally think only players that can come even close to winning the CL for a club would be Messi or Ronaldo can be ones to win it all every year. Otherwise if there is a player, like ADM, they are probably great for that season or two. While Reus, Bale, Griezmann would be star players, I don't think they would be the one to win us the CL every year. There is no reason Mane in the right team could not put together a great season or two - he is showing considerable progress and still quite young.

Yep, so snobby. There's a reason why clubs like Bayern Munich, Barcelona, Real Madrid - that have been consistently competing at the highest level of European football for about half a decade now choose to go for players like Neuer, Lewandowski, Costa, Neymar, Suarez, Bale, Isco, James and co. And that after they had a superb, somewhat experienced spine with Schweinsteiger, Lahm, Ribery, Robben, Messi, Xavi, Puyol, Iniesta, Ronaldo, Benzema, Ramos. We like to define United as a Top 3 or 4 European club in that company, then let's act our size instead of targeting above average Premier League players.

We need to build the spine of the team first, Mane is not the kind of player to do that, then we need to supplement the spine with more world class players, then we can have good squad options to be solid contributors - which is what Mane represents. Our attack already has 2 developmental players in Martial and Memphis, Rooney is fading, and Mata can't play the conductor role at the highest level. We need someone who can drag the team to another level, and ease the burden on the young talents. Or do we need to add a player with next to zero European experience, one that plays in the Cup of Nations, and is still somewhat inconsistent to the mix? You argue that Mane in the right team could not put together a great season or two.. Why aim for that? Why not get someone who can give you 5+ world class years? Is money an object? Is ambition?

Valencia wasn't seen as a player that would win us the CL but, in those first few years, before he lost all his confidence in taking players on, he was a beast for us and helped us compete to win it all. Mane can be very similar and he doesn't seem to be lacking in confidence. In Memphis we have a player might just be that super star and possibly now Martial. Mane could just be a very good player that gives us that extra speed, pace and goal threat that could make the others shine even more.

Yep, Antonio Valencia is so not a great example. Valencia was coming into a team with peak Van der Sar, Vidic, Ferdinand, Evra, Carrick, Rooney, Scholes, one that had won the league titles on the trot, reached two European Cup finals in a row, and was being managed by Fergie. How is that comparable to the team we have now? Where is the experienced spine? Where is the success that bred confidence? Or should we summarily dismiss those factors and treat his transfer in isolation? Also, Valencia has been rather poor outside of his first season when Rooney was on fire, and the 2011/ 2012 season where he provided 13 assists in the league. Apart from that, in 6+ years, he has never managed more than 3 assists and 2 goals in a league season.

Great return for £16 million. Meanwhile, someone like Arjen Robben moved to Bayern in 2009, and has been arguably one of the Top 5 attackers in Europe through the same time frame. David Silva moved to City in 2010 for £24 million, and he has been one of the best players in the league for the better part of a decade. Which was wiser? Valencia, or Robben/ Silva. Which is what Mane and Griezmann/ Bale is analogous to in terms of overall quality.

I don't understand where the vitriol is coming from.

Nuh uh, there's really no need to exaggerate.
noun
cruel and bitter criticism.

Most of the criticism, apart from being mild - isn't even directed at the player, but a potential transfer to United, when we could could instead target someone substantially better, with room for even more exponential growth. I for one have nothing against Mane. Just don't want him at United. Maybe Liverpool will sign him like they did with the rest of the Southampton lot (bar the only world class talent in Shaw).
 
I don't understand where the vitriol is coming from. Yeah he is not the best possible talent out there that we could get, but he could do a job as a squad player and off the bench for us. Was that not what Young was originally brought in for? To do a job and be a rotation option without there being too big of a drop in talent?

If we had the 3-4 years into the future versions of Adnan and Pereira, coupled with a Nani type, add in another winger and another striker in the squad, I wouldn't advocate his signing. But based on our team RIGHT NOW, with its huge lack of depth, he definitely would be a great option, whether it be off the bench or in the starting XI. Just remember that when we were down to PSV our attackers off the bench were Valencia and Fellaini.

How did that work out for us with Young? He hasn't consistently shown that he's good enough for this club and he certainly wasn't bought to be a squad player, at least Ferguson said as much. We should have replaced Ronaldo with more than just one quality signing and we tried to do it, but failed. Read this thread of how dreadful our transfer business has been prior to this summer. https://www.redcafe.net/threads/fergies-signings-after-carrick.400809/

The signings we've made following Ronaldo's departure or our shortcomings in the transfer market are one of the reasons why van Gaal has such a massive job to get us where we were aim to be. We simply aren't consistently as good as Barcelona, Madrid and Munich yet. Signing someone like Mane wouldn't take us closer to those clubs IMO. Most likely Mane wouldn't be a bad signing, but with the money we have there's really no reason not to go for Griezmann for example. If it doesn't work out, so be it. But he should be down on the list of priorities.
 
Last edited:
He has a shite haircut and looks like a bit of a bellend...definitely do not want despite his electric pace.....Janujaz will be twice as good in 1 year from now
 
How did that work out for us with Young? He hasn't consistently shown that he's good enough for this club and he certainly wasn't bought to be a squad player, at least Ferguson said as much. We should have replaced Ronaldo with more than just one quality signing and we tried to do it, but failed. Read this thread of how dreadful our transfer business has been prior to this summer. https://www.redcafe.net/threads/fergies-signings-after-carrick.400809/

The signings we've made following Ronaldo's departure or our shortcomings in the transfer market are one of the reasons why van Gaal has such a massive job to get us where we were aim to be. We simply aren't consistently as good as Barcelona, Madrid and Munich yet. Signing someone like Mane wouldn't take us closer to those clubs IMO. Most likely Mane wouldn't be a bad signing, but with the money we have there's really no reason not to go for Griezmann for example. If it doesn't work out, so be it. But he should be down on the list of priorities.
I concede your point about Young.

We need more world class players, no ones doubting that, but we need depth too. Even if we signed Griezz, we'd need to make another two signings I'd say for our attacking positions if we truly wanted to compete on all fronts. We can't rely solely on Martial/Griezz/Rooney/Mata/Young/Depay. I mean look at Costa and Bayern. He provides that depth that Bayern needs, but knows that he won't make it in the squad over Ribery and Robben if they're fully fit and in form. And I'm pretty sure Bayern knows once Robben and Ribery are past it they need to heavily reinforce again, even with Costa. The same could be said of Mane.

Yes Mane would be expensive, but all players who can play and succeed at a level necessary to make it at this club are going to be, even the squad players. As long as the club doesn't view him as the final solution if we sign him, I'm happy.
 
I concede your point about Young.

We need more world class players, no ones doubting that, but we need depth too. Even if we signed Griezz, we'd need to make another two signings I'd say for our attacking positions if we truly wanted to compete on all fronts. We can't rely solely on Martial/Griezz/Rooney/Mata/Young/Depay. I mean look at Costa and Bayern. He provides that depth that Bayern needs, but knows that he won't make it in the squad over Ribery and Robben if they're fully fit and in form. And I'm pretty sure Bayern knows once Robben and Ribery are past it they need to heavily reinforce again, even with Costa. The same could be said of Mane.

Yes Mane would be expensive, but all players who can play and succeed at a level necessary to make it at this club are going to be, even the squad players. As long as the club doesn't view him as the final solution if we sign him, I'm happy.

No criticism, have you seen Costa this season? Ribery will have a hard time getting into the first XI again the way Costa is playing. Mane isn't anywhere near the level Costa is playing at this season. Which is the point quite a few posters are trying to make. I agree that we need more than one signing for our attack and I'd still prefer others to Mane there.
 
No criticism, have you seen Costa this season? Ribery will have a hard time getting into the first XI again the way Costa is playing. Mane isn't anywhere near the level Costa is playing at this season. Which is the point quite a few posters are trying to make. I agree that we need more than one signing for our attack and I'd still prefer others to Mane there.
Costa has been lights out. But he wasn't performing all that well in Ukraine is what I'm trying to get at before they signed him. I don't think Bayern signed him knowingly thinking he's going to replace R and R this season, and if they did, hats off to them. All it took was an injury to them, and several outstanding performances later Bayern have a gem on their hands. Not saying if we sign Mane well have a world beater, but he has shown the potential for making the step up.

I'll give you hypothetical situation.. Had everything else stayed the same this season transfer wise, but we had gotten Pedro and Griezz, would the signing of Mane, let's say for 25 million pounds, be as scoffed at? That to me would have been the ideal situation for bringing Mane in, but he would still get the opportunity had an injury or two occurred.
 
Costa has been lights out. But he wasn't performing all that well in Ukraine is what I'm trying to get at before they signed him. I don't think Bayern signed him knowingly thinking he's going to replace R and R this season, and if they did, hats off to them. All it took was an injury to them, and several outstanding performances later Bayern have a gem on their hands. Not saying if we sign Mane well have a world beater, but he has shown the potential for making the step up.

I'll give you hypothetical situation.. Had everything else stayed the same this season transfer wise, but we had gotten Pedro and Griezz, would the signing of Mane, let's say for 25 million pounds, be as scoffed at? That to me would have been the ideal situation for bringing Mane in, but he would still get the opportunity had an injury or two occurred.

Costa was always one of Donetsk best players in the Champions League, that's all I know to be fair, but I doubt it was any different in the Ukrainian league. He was easily their most talented player. I agree that probably no one expected him to take the Bundesliga by storm and something similar could happen with Mane, but I remain sceptical. IMO Mane doesn't look as good as Valencia looked for Wigan for example.

As for your scenario, there wouldn't be any need for Mane, if both players would have signed. If it's one of Pedro or Griezmann, I'd still prefer Fekir and other players to Mane. That's just me though.
 
With another name & nationality, people would be crying out for his signature. He's obviously a better winger than Mata, Valencia & Young and if we can get him for £20m, we should go all out for him in January.

Not sure he fits Van Gaal felfelosophy though.
 
With another name & nationality, people would be crying out for his signature. He's obviously a better winger than Mata, Valencia & Young and if we can get him for £20m, we should go all out for him in January.

Not sure he fits Van Gaal felfelosophy though.

Why would we be able to get him for £20m? Southampton paid £12m when he was a relatively unknown player from Salzburg. He'll be £30m at least now and given the insane prices in PL I wouldn't be surprised if they asked for £45m.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.