Not to worry as they have allegedly have millions of troops who haven't yet been used as cannon fodder.
He wasn’t “retired”, he was dismissed without honors after crashing a plane he didn’t even have a required expertise to fly on in an attempt to perform some showboating trick.Why on Earth would a major general fly in risky areas (although if I am not mistaken, MG is just one star general in Russian military, unlike in the US when they hold two stars)?
He wasn’t “retired”, he was dismissed without honors after crashing a plane he didn’t even have a required expertise to fly on in an attempt to perform some showboating trick.
So, most likely, he was recruited by some private military company like Wagner, although, as you can imagine, there’s not a lot of information open to the public.
Was not aware contractors had jets.He wasn’t “retired”, he was dismissed without honors after crashing a plane he didn’t even have a required expertise to fly on in an attempt to perform some showboating trick.
So, most likely, he was recruited by some private military company like Wagner, although, as you can imagine, there’s not a lot of information open to the public.
You have to understand that they’re very much intertwined with the Army (and Putin’s elite). In the BBC podcast that discussed this general they’ve talked about it as well, apparently they have an option to “lease” them.Was not aware contractors had jets.
You have to understand that they’re very much intertwined with the Army (and Putin’s elite). In the BBC podcast that discussed this general they’ve talked about it as well, apparently they have an option to “lease” them.
I’m not sure. Wagner is essentially just another part of Putin’s enormous and complicated enforcer apparatus — they aren’t much different than the army itself but they’re more experienced, they get paid better and you can claim that any of their involvement in different conflicts abroad (like in CAR or in Syria) has nothing to do with Russia. Which is why they can, although I’m sure that it’s not done through legit sources, “lease” Russian planes and vehicles, use military airports etc.So, if Ukraine hires some western private company like Blackwater, and they "lease" a few dozen F-35 aircraft for operation inside Ukraine, will that be something similar?
The news coming out of Ukraine feels depressing. Feels as if Russia are beginning to slowly grind the Ukrainian defensives in the Donbas down. Not sure the West has the same enthusiasm and collective resolve as it did the immediate months.
Lot of talk that now Putin has been humiliated there is less interest from some NATO countries.The news coming out of Ukraine feels depressing. Feels as if Russia are beginning to slowly grind the Ukrainian defensives in the Donbas down. Not sure the West has the same enthusiasm and collective resolve as it did the immediate months.
Lot of talk that now Putin has been humiliated there is less interest from some NATO countries.
I wouldn't be surprised if there actually is less interest in a lot of places right now, and especially the US. Russia is no longer attacking all of Ukraine, there is now 'just' a war of attrition in the east and Russia isn't clearly winning it. Places that see Russia as a competitor (like the US) are probably happy with this situation, as it is very costly for Russia, won't be good for Russian public support for the war, and means the sanctions can stay in place - all without further effort from or cost to NATO and (mostly) without the sort of outrageous situations/events that make the general public of NATO countries force their governments into action. From the perspective of the US government, I imagine that's a pretty good situation.Don't think there is less interest. We just can't send massive financial support and weapons constantly on a day to day basis. I'd say apart from engaging in a direct hot war with Russia in Ukraine the west is doing what it can.
I wouldn't be surprised if there actually is less interest in a lot of places right now, and especially the US. Russia is no longer attacking all of Ukraine, there is now 'just' a war of attrition in the east and Russia isn't clearly winning it. Places that see Russia as a competitor (like the US) are probably happy with this situation, as it is very costly for Russia, won't be good for Russian public support for the war, and means the sanctions can stay in place - all without further effort from or cost to NATO and (mostly) without the sort of outrageous situations/events that make the general public of NATO countries force their governments into action. From the perspective of the US government, I imagine that's a pretty good situation.
(Yes, it's a very cynical outlook, I know.)
Lot of talk that now Putin has been humiliated there is less interest from some NATO countries.
Just looking at the current headlines. Telegraph article from today for example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion...t-crumbling-now-putin-has-humiliated-ukraine/Where is this "lot of talk" ? I think some are conflating the fact that Ukraine isn't leading the daily news cycle with the level of commitment that has already been shown by "the west" to support the Ukrainian military. The money is still flowing and the weapons are still clandestinely making their way into Ukraine across neighboring NATO borders.
Incendiary munitions raining down in Donbas.
Just looking at the current headlines. Telegraph article from today for example: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion...t-crumbling-now-putin-has-humiliated-ukraine/
I don't think so since there is so little smoke, Phosphorus makes a lot of smoke when it burns. Russians have some incendiary munitions that doesn't use Phosphorus for the grad mlrs system and that could be what we are seeing here..Is that white phosphorus?
fecking surreal.I don't think so since there is so little smoke, Phosphorus makes a lot of smoke when it burns. Russians have some incendiary munitions that doesn't use Phosphorus for the grad mlrs system and that could be what we are seeing here..
Thats my feeling too; but there seem to be a couple of unknowns here. One is that Russia simply cannot continue at this rate of attrition in order to achieve the relatively small gains they have made. The other is that (and I have no idea if it’s true or not) Ukraine is doing what Russia was too impatient to do- building up motivated, trained forces to counter attack, and for the moment just holding on as much as they can whilst that build up happens. Obviously I hope both those things are true but it’s impossible to prove. I guess in a months time we might be seeing a very different picture.
Russians appear to be advancing a lot more than expected?
Looks like they’re taking a lot of casualties but are slowly edging forwards yes. Ukraine are waiting on a lot of long range weaponry though, maybe that will change things.