Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

What the feck is this lads? Take it to anther thread.
 
It's astounding that so many people are arguing about what happened a mere 100 years ago. This isn't ancient history.

When do present and undeniable facts become malleable history? 20 years? 50?
 
I do believe that this article would've made more sense at the beginning of this thread when we were discussing history, context and everything else that seemed to matter at the moment. It couldn't exist back then but it's another matter. Putin's actions forcefully dragged that complex (and fascinatingly interesting from a de-humanised academical perspective) situation to a point where it's very much black & white. At least as close to black & white as any geopolitical conflict can be in a real world.

Still, it's an article that's well worth the read, especially for those who had denied the existence of the Ukrainian civil war and a tectonic split that has originated many decades ago (that Putin, sadly, noticed very early and continued to drop bombs, metaphorical and, from some point, real ones, into it). It does humanise the people that, but many, had been written off as even non-existent — who themselves are very much the victims. The journalist is trust-worthy if you're willing to take my word on it (I've known him for more than a decade now even though we were never close — we go to the same protests, he had covered Maidan and the recent Minsk election protests etc.).

I've been hyping this article for a while now, so here's the bad news — I don't have the time (or expertise) to provide a proper translation, so I'm going to use google-translate. I've glanced over the translation and it's decent enough to get the gist of it although of course a lot of connotations are going to disappear. It's quite long, so I'm only going to quote a couple of paragraphs — I'll leave a link and you can auto-translate it in Chrome etc:

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5229355

On Monday, my colleagues and I decided to travel around the Rostov region, closer to the then-unrecognized DPR. The five-kilometer border zone remained closed to most journalists all these days - the FSB Public Relations Center ignored dozens of requests to work there. Those who dared to get out without permission came back and told about not very polite people who took pictures of documents, forced them to format the flash drives of cameras and sent them back with a warning: “We will see you here again, we will talk in a different place and in a different way.” But we decided that on the day of the meeting of the Security Council, something interesting could happen in those parts, so our car was spinning along roads and country roads without stopping at the ban.
Journalists listened to the speeches of members of the Security Council; the driver, gloomier, looked at the alarming red charts of Russian stocks in the banking application. He invested not so much money, but every minute it became less. Finally, he could not stand it and pulled over to the side of the road: "Who needs it, go piss, and I'll buy dollars for now."
When all financial transactions were completed, we drove onto the main road and moved to the border. The track was pretty much gouged - something like Tverskaya Street in preparation for the May parade. On the screen of a smartphone, the director of the Foreign Intelligence Service, Sergei Naryshkin, found it difficult to answer the question of whether he supported the recognition or accession of the republics. At that moment, the driver whistled: “Guys, look to the left, but don’t even touch your cameras.” A long column of military equipment stood in the field - tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, trucks, jeeps ... Neatly placed along the forest belt, they seemed like a collection of expensive toys on a mantelpiece. The equipment was perfectly visible from the public road - perhaps it was specially placed so that it could be seen better.

The meeting of the Security Council dragged on, the situation near the border remained peaceful (adjusted for circumstances), the dollar grew, the ruble fell. I decided to rush to Taganrog, to talk with the evacuated residents of the DPR. The police did not allow journalists to enter the temporary accommodation centers, but several hotels accepted the refugees, which meant that it was possible to sit in the lobby, drink tea and get into people's souls. At the entrance they checked my press card, but they could not forbid me to stay in the hotel.

"My soul in Russia"
Vladimir Putin ended the Security Council meeting with a promise to “make a decision today” – but, to be honest, there was no intrigue anymore. Apparently, therefore, the atmosphere in the hotel did not resemble the day of the final match of the World Cup. There were no crowds at the screens hung on the walls, no one paced the lobby, waiting for the president's address. Citizens of the as-yet unrecognized DPR had a quiet dinner in the canteen, then stood in line for a PCR test and went back to their rooms. Colleagues from Dozhd (included in the register of media-foreign agents) recorded interviews. I also approached the elderly woman and asked for permission to "talk about the results of the Security Council meeting." Under normal circumstances, this question would sound as idiotic as possible - but not today.
- We are now protected by Russia, that's all the results. It means a lot to us and is worth a lot. Now we are waiting for joining Russia, all Donetsk is for it. And I think that Luhansk too.
— Are you from Donetsk?
- Yes, I was born there, lived all my life, now I am 68 years old. And my parents are buried there.
- Tell me, before the events of 2014, who did you consider yourself to be? Russian or Ukrainian?
“Oh-oh-oh, I'm Russian at heart,” the woman nods confidently. “I'm Russian. I lived in Ukraine, yes, but my soul is in Russia.
— And when you lived in Soviet Donetsk, did you have problems with the Ukrainians?
- Yes, there was nothing like that, no one separated us. We all lived the same way, lived as one family. We spoke in Russian, no one forbade us to do this. We were spoken to in Ukrainian, and we understood each other. Here was my mother from the village, she only spoke Ukrainian. And we in our family spoke Ukrainian and Russian, it did not embarrass us in any way, did not bother us in any way. Because we lived a quiet life, we went to work, we knew that we would have an advance payment, a salary, a pension ... And now we receive pensions only thanks to you.
- And when the USSR collapsed, how did you live in independent Ukraine?
- Yes, good. Fine. There were no conflicts, everything went fine. Until the fourteenth year.
To be honest, I don't really understand you right now. You and the Ukrainians were together in the Soviet Union...
- And they lived wonderfully!
- ... then in independent Ukraine ...
- And they also lived normally.
“Then what went wrong?” Why has everything changed?
The woman is thinking.
— You see… subconsciously we were probably closer to Russia anyway. Well, I speak for myself, for many of my acquaintances, girlfriends, classmates. We have always been closer to Russia, you see. Well, again, Western Ukraine has always considered us ... well, you know who. Not people like them. They think we're a completely different breed.
- And how did it manifest itself in life? Have you personally encountered such an attitude?
- Me not. But you know, it was somehow in the air. And it began to splash out at the time of the first Maidan, when Yushchenko (Viktor Yushchenko, President of Ukraine in 2005-2010. - "Kommersant" ) was still ... Starting from those elections, some kind of pressure began to be clearly felt. It was in the air that we were not like them. That they should have more power. From that moment on, everything went downhill. Otherwise, I think we would have lived quietly ...
— But you didn't live in Western Ukraine. Where did you feel the pressure?
- Yes, we have no conflict. Well, we somehow thought that they, “Bandera” (a common designation for Ukrainian nationalists, named after Stepan Bandera, 1909-1959. - “Kommersant”), from birth, from childhood, are set against us. And it all accumulated, accumulated ... and then something happened that happened. I don't know how to explain it to you, but it was just in the air. No, no one thought that this could happen. But you see how - it all came to this in the end.
The woman collects her thoughts, and then continues - already quite confidently:
- From time immemorial, it seems to me, it has been like this: Bandera - they are against us. Because we don't think like them. Muscovites - that's what they call us. And you, by the way, too.
- Have you personally been called that at least once - "Moskal"? Well - in the face?
- No never. Never in all 68 years has anyone said that to my face. But I heard on TV how they shouted that year: “Whoever does not jump is a Muscovite!” Was it? It was.
“I think you would be told that this is a joke…”
- You know, something was not funny to me. Not funny at all. And I'll tell you this: ours, Donetsk, were not on the Maidan. Because our people work, not jump.
I talked on the Maidan with a man from Donbass. But I don’t have time to tell about it - a gray-haired husband comes up to the woman and asks to go to bed. Finally she says:
“On the Maidan, they wanted to decide everything for us—that’s what went wrong. They wanted us not to speak Russian. And we wanted no one to oppress us. Now, I think that's how it will be.

"They didn't see us"
A man in his forties sits at a table in the corner of the lobby with a small child on his lap. He babbles something in his own language - not yet Russian or Ukrainian. I ask his father (“Very nice, Igor”) about the results of the Security Council.

- Our opinion is unequivocal, we have been waiting for this decision for eight years. Because we have been living in hell for eight years. Psychologically, first of all. In 2017, we were ticking away from the shelling when my wife was pregnant with this man,” he strokes the child’s head. “We lived in Donetsk on Putilovka, and here there was a hit in the Zasyadko mine. Glass flew out, well, everything is clear, it's time to tick. For this case, we had a “disturbing suitcase” assembled - you probably don’t know, we call it a bag with documents, medicines, underwear ...

I know what an "alarm suitcase" is. Because residents of Ukrainian cities in recent weeks have often posted on social networks photos of their "alarm suitcases" - which they collected in case of a Russian invasion. And many residents of Russian cities wrote in the comments how ashamed they were. I didn't write, but I was ashamed too. And I am ashamed now, when I listen to Igor, because I never thought about whether the residents of Donetsk have “alarm suitcases”.

- ... So at four o'clock in the morning, in complete darkness, we ran with a pregnant wife for several blocks to the nearest bus stop. Because the transport did not reach our area. When my son grows up, I will tell him - he will not believe.

I ask Igor the same question - who did he feel like before the war, Russian or Ukrainian. He replies confidently:

- Until the fourteenth year, I felt like a Ukrainian. Ukrainian of Russian origin. And this is normal: if you live, let’s say, in Poland for at least a year, you will get used to their way of life, listen to their music, understand their humor, fall in love with their dishes, and involuntarily feel like a little Pole. So here too. Living in Ukraine, you feel like a Ukrainian. Because here is salo, here is borscht, here is tsibulya, Ukrainian songs - and you feel like a Ukrainian. But with Russian roots. We think in Russian, we have Russian humor - and this is also normal and should not bother anyone.

I understood Ukrainian. And if I had a child then, I would have given it to Ukrainian as an additional one. We live in this state, it is necessary to know its language. But to force, - he emphasizes in a voice, - to force us to switch to Ukrainian - well, this is simply against my will. Well, how can I force myself to think in Ukrainian?

- But before 2014, you faced some kind of neglect because of the language, because of the Russian roots?

- I heard from my friends that this happens beyond the Donbass. For example, in a store you may not be served if you speak Russian. But I have never encountered this. But in 2003-2006 I traveled all over Ukraine. I then worked as a videographer, how much we traveled on business trips: Dnepropetrovsk, Kiev, Odessa - oh, I would love to walk around Odessa again with such pleasure. We went to small towns in Western Ukraine - and everyone spoke Russian to us normally. Maybe only in the villages there were old people who spoke Ukrainian to us. Well, it's okay - we also know the Ukrainian language. And so - well, at all levels they spoke to us in Russian.

“Then what went wrong?” Why did you and your neighbors eventually leave Ukraine?

“Wait, we didn’t leave Ukraine!” - Igor is worried. - I think that it was Ukraine that left us.

What was the point of no return for you?

“You know, I didn’t have such a clear point. It's just that everything began to accumulate... First, the Maidan, with which I personally did not agree. Then they began to resent the complete discrepancy between what they say on Ukrainian channels and what we really have going on here. They say that we have here not locals, but the Russian army. But in fact, in April 2014, no Russian army was here.

Then my colleagues call me, they say: Chinese television has arrived, they need a local operator. We went to Slavyansk, where it all started for us, and I saw with my own eyes the checkpoints on our side - and on the Ukrainian side. What did our checkpoint look like then? Sandbags, tires and a bunch of bottles of combustible mixture. Nearby are people with sticks, and for the entire checkpoint - well, maybe one hunting rifle. And after a couple of kilometers - their territory. My hair stood on end there, I suffered so much fear. They are all standing in full ammunition, in "spheres", nearby in the forest belt are camouflaged tanks. You walk and think: how is it possible against people with sticks. And then you think: but this is all against you too. And then I realized that there was no way back, it seems. When your state sends an army against you, you no longer perceive it as your state.

Chronicle of the battles for Slavyansk in 2014
On April 12, the "People's Militia of Donbass" under the leadership of a citizen of the Russian Federation, ex-FSB officer Igor Strelkov seized the regional police department, the city council and the building of the SBU in Slavyansk.
On April 13, the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Arsen Avakov, announced the start of a military operation in Slavyansk. Mayor Nelya Shtepa left the city, the leader of the militia, Vyacheslav Ponomarev, became the "people's mayor".
On April 15, Slavyansk was encircled by 20 armored personnel carriers, 2,000 soldiers and ten tanks. In neighboring Kramatorsk, during a special operation, the security forces took the airfield.
On May 2, the active phase of the operation began with the use of aviation and armored vehicles. The military blocked the entrances to the city.
On May 7, the militia exchanged three SBU officers for Pavel Gubarev, the “People’s Governor” of Donbass, who was detained in March, and two other people.
May 11 and about. Head of the Presidential Administration of Ukraine Serhiy Pashinsky said that the military operation in Slavyansk, Kramatorsk and Krasny Liman had entered the final stage.
On May 24, in Andreevka (a suburb of Slavyansk), Italian journalist Andy Rocchelli and his translator, Russian Andrei Mironov, were killed.
On May 29, militias shot down a Ukrainian Mi-8 helicopter, killing 14 soldiers.
On June 3, shelling of the city began. During the day, according to the Ukrainian side, 300 militiamen were killed and 500 wounded.
On June 24, the militia shot down a Mi-8 helicopter. Nine people were killed, including four employees of the SBU.
On July 5, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine reported to the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko about the capture of Slavyansk. The militia left the city.


- Then the Chinese went to Mount Karachun, and there we walked just on a carpet of shell casings. The locals stand with shaking hands, they say that the military drove up in an armored personnel carrier and began to drive them away. People scattered around - and then they started shooting at the legs. That's what they told us there.

An elderly woman approaches us. She silently sits on a nearby chair and listens to Igor's story. Her face is a frozen mask.

“We were walking to the bridge before going up the mountain, and then I saw… a body. For me, this was the first casualty of the war. Maybe it was the first casualty of this war, I don't know. The corpse of a man with bullet wounds through the entire torso. I am an unprepared person, it was terrible. I take it off, of course, I automatically look for better light ... But I myself think - probably, his wife does not even know yet that he is dead.

— Did you still feel like a citizen of Ukraine at that moment?

Long pause.

- To be honest, I'm at a loss now ... I haven't felt like a citizen of Ukraine for so long that I can't remember. But then I looked at the Ukrainian military only as people from a foreign state.

You know, in my past life I loved watching parades. You see - the border guards are coming, they have such a dress uniform. Paratroopers are coming - a different form. Everything is beautiful, calm. And then you come to the checkpoint of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - and there people are in a completely different uniform. In the black "spheres", the faces are closed ... I did not have the feeling that they were protecting me here.

- You know, I was on the Maidan. I remember that people were talking about OMON, about Berkut. That they have a terrible aggressive form, black armor, and this is no longer perceived as a force of law and order. For them, they were aliens, strangers, enemies. And at the recent protests in Minsk, people told me the same thing. It turns out that your, let's say, political opponents experienced the same emotions in relation to the Berkut on Maidan as you did to the Ukrainian army. What do you think of it?

“You know… I'm not used to thinking like that. I don't know how to analyze like that. I am a professional in some things, but not in politics, not in military operations. I am an ordinary person, though a creative person. For me, the main thing is that there is peace. And if some kind of conflict starts, I can’t immediately understand who is right and who is wrong, sorry.

“It’s just perfectly normal, in my opinion.

— When before the war, as a cameraman, I filmed politicians, press conferences, I honestly tried to listen to them, to understand, to find my own attitude. But I always lost the thread in their words. I get distracted by the camera settings, sound - and lose the essence. So here - I can't tell you about psychology, sorry.

I can only say this - you have been talking with a friend for many years, you seem to know him. And then he suddenly comes to you in a suit ... well, I don't know, in a shaman's suit with a tambourine. And he starts talking to you. You sit and think - this is still my friend, but a completely different person. And you just stop being friends with him, because you have nothing in common. It's probably the same here. And they feel the same way about us. They lived and lived in their own world, then suddenly there is a conflict - and they see us in a completely different way. We, too, in their eyes, dressed up as someone else, we are also different for them, separatists ...

— Could you look at yourself through the eyes of Ukrainians? Through the eyes of people who for all these eight years consider you separatists and traitors?

- Probably not. My imagination is not that developed. Living here, seeing everything that is happening here… I can't imagine how people in Kiev can see it differently.

- What do you have in mind? What do they not see?

The woman suddenly says, "They can't see us."

Igor continues:

“Just don’t be offended, but in order to understand what has been happening here all these years, you had to be inside. We must live like we do - learn to determine the "pluses" and "minuses". Do you know what it is? And we know: “pluses” are for us (shells are flying. - “Kommersant” ), “minuses” are an answer from us. And here you are sitting at dinner, the children are doing their homework, and then there is a rumble outside the window. But you are all calm, because you know - it's nothing, it's not scary. But when the dishes begin to rattle and the frames fly out - then you all the families fall to the floor, no matter what you do at that moment. Because it's a plus.

My wife was in the hospital, a girl with a four-year-old child lay with her in the ward - and he did not talk. It turned out to be psychological trauma. She said: “Once again, we ran away from the shelling into the basement, then it flew in very close, it rumbled so that the child was frightened and simply stopped talking.”

Now let's imagine that I am now in Kiev or Lvov, where bombs do not fall. I sit at the computer and find out that this is happening in the Donbass. That my army is firing on ordinary people like me. Then I would say: well, fir-trees, well, why the heck do that? People live there, schools are there, kindergartens are there. Why shoot like that? Is there no other way to agree?

- Did you have acquaintances, friends who chose the side of Ukraine in this conflict?

- There was one comrade - well, we played in the same group, we talked in so far as. When it all started with us, he took their side. We stopped talking, of course. Then he suddenly sent me a picture for my birthday: “3 day of birth” and attributed it to “Glory to Ukraine.” I answered him, without rudeness, and attached a picture with a bunch of dill. He read - and I blocked him everywhere. Why he chose that, I don't know.

- Did he leave?

- Of course, he left. He couldn't live with us...

I'm tempted to ask "why?" — but that would be too cruel.

- I don't blame him, - continues Igor. - How to blame a person for political convictions? But then you don’t have to blame me for my opinion either. Do you have such an opinion? Well, take it and go to your like-minded people.

- So after all, they can tell you: “Go to Russia.”

- But why? Donetsk is my home. Why should I leave here? Just don't touch us.

In the end, I can not stand it and ask:

- You said that in April 2014 there were no Russian troops ... This begs the question - and then?

What about "then"? Then the Chinese moved on. I found myself another job and no longer delved into what kind of army it was. I didn't leave Donetsk anymore; all the military guys that I knew were ours, local. I myself have a Russian flag in my car, and I’m not the only one — it doesn’t mean that we are Russians who arrived. I just love Russia. We are just Russians.

- At the beginning of the conversation, you said that until 2014 you felt like a Ukrainian with Russian roots ...

— With the Russians.

- Yes, but now you finished with the phrase: "We are Russians." Can you remember when you had such a fracture? When did you start saying: “I am Russian”?

Igor shrugs.

— Yes, there was no such moment. It just accumulated - and I began to feel that way.

The rest can be accessed by the link below:

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5229355
 
Russian army is stronger than NATO European forces (unless USA army joins, of course, and USA won’t join as it will lead to a nuclear war with guaranteed destruction of all the parties involved).

So it probably is not a big threat for Putin.
Thats just not true. The 10 biggest European Nato members yearly military budgets combined are almost 5 times bigger than Russias yearly spending. You really think Russia are able to field a stronger army than the rest of Europe for less than a fifth of the cost?
 
What?

:lol:

This is like saying Himmler wasn't a Nazi.
See above /\ /\

(actually, having read the rest of your post, you actually agree with me without realising it, you go on to literally describe why Stalin was not a bona fide Bolshevik)
 
Last edited:
This is not about Trump. It's about Putin's perception of the Dems using Russia and himself as a form of political dogshit.

I mentioned Trump as you and the other fella parrotted his response to Putin.

Then you said something about Biden smearing Trump and now you're telling me it isn't about Trump.

Probably best to leave it there. I don't really care what your point is and I don't want to further add to the derailment.
 
Things appear to be heating up a little, just as nighttime falls over Ukraine.

Cyberattacks on government websites and banks, same as last week. Some re-assurance though is that if there was a full on invasion we would expect complete internet blackout.
Some reports of Ukrainian checkpoints around Donbas packing up and either bugging out or seeking better cover.
Three US/RAF surveillance planes over Ukraine right now covering similar flighpaths (with their transponders on), there's usually been just the one.
 
Now is a good time to purge your timelines on social media. If anyone at this point is taking a virulently pro Russia stances, then they have been bought by Putin's money and dodgy internet goon squads. They will have funded loony groups on the left and the right so don't discriminate on that basis.

I'm glad that soon I'll be moving to Ireland rather than living in a country that has actually been stupid enough to let one of his bunch of criminals get into power!
 
If the people in Eastern Ukraine feel Russian and want to be Russian, then they should be given the choice.

Also, if the Western side feels closer to the West and want to join NATO, they should also be allowed.

Perhaps that is the compromise that can happen. To split the country into East and West Ukraine. Yes there will be new borders and some land will have to be ceded, but better than having the whole country subjugated to war.
 
Oh, really? Why didn’t Biden insist on Zelensky abiding with Minsk agreements, then? :)

Minsk agreements were in writing and duly ratified, and Zelensky had to grant Donbas a special constitutional status and conduct the elections. For some mysterious reason it didn’t happen (maybe, just maybe it was because Ukraine wouldn’t be in a position to join NATO then?)
That was a mistake by Ukraine signing something so vague, especially with respect to the exact regions these breakaway republics are confined to. Its more or less impossible to implement because of the fundamental disagreements about territory. Also, Russia had to withdraw first, and let Ukraine regain control and then proceed with the elections , but they denied even being there.
 
I am genuinely curious here whether Putin's interest is strictly on just Ukrainian territory or is he possibly trying to push the envelope and actually has plans for greater things.
 
I dunno to what level the poster meant "wanted to join them", but with the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and following trade agreements, the USSR and Germany were in a sort of uneasy cooperation in both divvying up Eastern Europe and essential industrial materials, goods and even prospective military equipment trade. Stalin was generally more suspicious of the UK and the US, since those countries had actively fought against the Bolsheviks in the Russian Revolution. He was also in a sort of denial when reports in 1941 from both his own intel services and the UK's kept indicating that a German invasion was imminent.

This is entirely off topic for the thread, but the Soviets did send a proposal to the Germans in the 1940 that outlined the conditions in which the Soviets would be willing to join the Axis. The sticking point for Hitler was Stalin's insistent of Soviet spheres of influence in Finland and the Balkans. I don't know however if it is clear whether Stalin saw this "alliance" has a long-lasting partnership or a temporary measure giving the Soviets time to strengthen before an inevitable conflict with Nazi Germany.
 
If the people in Eastern Ukraine feel Russian and want to be Russian, then they should be given the choice.

Also, if the Western side feels closer to the West and want to join NATO, they should also be allowed.

Perhaps that is the compromise that can happen. To split the country into East and West Ukraine. Yes there will be new borders and some land will have to be ceded, but better than having the whole country subjugated to war.
Anything is better than that.
 
So far only Newsweek is reporting the 48 hours number. Hard to believe they'd have a scoop over the likes of AP, Reuters, NYT or WaPo.

 
If the people in Eastern Ukraine feel Russian and want to be Russian, then they should be given the choice.

Also, if the Western side feels closer to the West and want to join NATO, they should also be allowed.

Perhaps that is the compromise that can happen. To split the country into East and West Ukraine. Yes there will be new borders and some land will have to be ceded, but better than having the whole country subjugated to war.

Seems reasonable in and of itself, but in the vast lands compromising the remnants of the Russian, Austrian-Hungarian, and Ottoman Empires, the precedent it would consolidate would potential cause a lot of violent chaos (although with the examples of Abkhazia, Kosovo, etc. you could argue the precedent has already been set).
 
He initially wanted to join Hitler as well but was rebuffed.

No. It's complicated, but no.

He was in power from 1925 and Hitler came to power in 32, so initially would be early/mid 30s. Hitler came to power vowing the crush "Judeo-Bolshevism". Naturally the USSR was the target, and naturally Stalin tried to form an alliance with France and the UK, under the banner of collective security. Worldwide, the Communist parties (by now, all controlled from Moscow) were very critical of Hitler - much more than mainstream parties. Of course, since they were puppets, they did a 180 the day Stalin did his 180, in 1939, with the M-R pact. And then inevitably Hitler wanted to crush Judeo-Bolshevism anyway.

Can't find a wiki or similar article, but this isn't hidden history. If you're interested, someone's dissertation is the first google result :lol:
 
No. It's complicated, but no.

He was in power from 1925 and Hitler came to power in 32, so initially would be early/mid 30s. Hitler came to power vowing the crush "Judeo-Bolshevism". Naturally the USSR was the target, and naturally Stalin tried to form an alliance with France and the UK, under the banner of collective security. Worldwide, the Communist parties (by now, all controlled from Moscow) were very critical of Hitler - much more than mainstream parties. Of course, since they were puppets, they did a 180 the day Stalin did his 180, in 1939, with the M-R pact. And then inevitably Hitler wanted to crush Judeo-Bolshevism anyway.

Can't find a wiki or similar article, but this isn't hidden history. If you're interested, someone's dissertation is the first google result :lol:

I already provided the source in a post earlier. He wanted to become the 4th axis power but his demands were rejected.
 
Russia should agree to withdraw and the Ukrainians should sort out their problems peacefully.
 
If any of you want to have an idea of Putins endgame here, read this. https://agdugintranslate.gitbook.io/foundations-of-geopolitics/
Putin's endgame is invading China whilst also supporting them in conquering Australia?

  • China, which represents a danger to Russia, "must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking TibetXinjiangInner MongoliaManchuria as a security belt.[1] Russia should offer China help "in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia" as geopolitical compensation.[9]
 
Putin's endgame is invading China whilst also supporting them in conquering Australia?

I doubt the article means invading China, by 'dismantling' they likely mean defeating economically, or by any means really. Kinda like the American aspirations for what to do with the USSR, Ronald Reagan is considered by many to have been pivotal in the Soviet downfall by reinvigorating the arms race, drawing the Russians into an undertaking they couldn't afford while their economy was in such ruin by the mid-to-late 80s 'era of stagnation'.
 
If the people in Eastern Ukraine feel Russian and want to be Russian, then they should be given the choice.

Also, if the Western side feels closer to the West and want to join NATO, they should also be allowed.

Perhaps that is the compromise that can happen. To split the country into East and West Ukraine. Yes there will be new borders and some land will have to be ceded, but better than having the whole country subjugated to war.

Not sure how you oversee fair elections/referendum on the matter though? Isn't that one of the issues, Ukraine wanted the territory back under control before they would allow a vote on independence?

I'm not really seeing a trusted third party that could step in. Turkey? China?
 
I doubt the article means invading China, by 'dismantling' they likely mean defeating economically, or by any means really. Kinda like the American aspirations for what to do with the USSR, Ronald Reagan is considered by many to have been pivotal in the Soviet downfall by reinvigorating the arms race, drawing the Russians into an undertaking they couldn't afford while their economy was in such ruin by the mid-to-late 80s 'era of stagnation'.
It's not an article, it's a book by a fascist fantasist.
 
Not sure how you oversee fair elections/referendum on the matter though? Isn't that one of the issues, Ukraine wanted the territory back under control before they would allow a vote on independence?

I'm not really seeing a trusted third party that could step in. Turkey? China?

Well Russia has changed all that now. There won't be a vote. Just negotiated new territories.

I guess the choice is up to the people on the ground if they want to move West, or stay in the East under Russian control. But this time, there will be NATO + Ukrainian forces at the new borders.
 
@harms that article is interesting but doesn't get me any closer to working anything out.

It's all the usual century-old mindfeck of the right to self-determination vs how geopolitical chopping and changing has created hotspots of confrontation and animosity with split populations so even the "let them vote and choose" isn't as simple and practical as it sounds.

The odd thing is how prevalent it has been in Europe and the Middle East and not in other parts of the world even if they have been subject to it recently. Or, more precisely, how it has flared up more aggressively as it's not like China hasn't been fecking about a fair bit.
 
It's not an article, it's a book by a fascist fantasist.

Admittedly I'm working so didn't look :lol: - All I will say is that regardless of what that book says, it is true that Russia and China are competitors, that much goes without saying. They may have some shared interests regarding NATO and the west in general but ultimately there's no love between them and historically their relationship has been turbulent, particularly when both were actively expanding their spheres of influence during the Soviet era. I doubt they'll ever fight a war mind.
 
If the people in Eastern Ukraine feel Russian and want to be Russian, then they should be given the choice.

Also, if the Western side feels closer to the West and want to join NATO, they should also be allowed.

Perhaps that is the compromise that can happen. To split the country into East and West Ukraine. Yes there will be new borders and some land will have to be ceded, but better than having the whole country subjugated to war.
This seems like the most sensible solution. Refusing to recognize the will of the people serves nobody and will hurt Ukraine the most. The West is using Ukraine as a stick to hit Russia with. There is no way you want "stability" or want the best for Ukraine by implementing anti-Russian laws in a country were as many as 30% of its population is Russian, and especially in the Eastern parts of Ukraine where so many Russian people live. Banning a language which third of your country speaks? How stupid is that?

If Putin limits his advance to the Eastern half of Ukraine then I don't see these areas rebelling against him or fighting against joining Russia, and betting on a popular resistance (armed or not) seems futile. Situation will be unclear though if he advances further into the Western parts which could backfire.

Ukraine-census-2001-Russian.webp