But not at Chelsea. I think he'll make it, but not there.
Because Chelsea have so many strikers? If he continues to develop he could be a better option than Torres in a year.
But not at Chelsea. I think he'll make it, but not there.
Looked pretty decent again in the highlights.
He's going to be a star...
Also... after Morrison equalized, Lukaku didnt celebrate.. ran up towards the goal, kicked the ball in again and then started celebrating alone.
madman
He really is a beast isn't he. Don't understand how they allowed him to go on loan especially with them being so light in that department. He is still only 19 which i find a bit baffling.
The only comparison to Drogba that I can see is the fact they both struggled in their first season. Completely different style of play as Drogba could score from anywhere and brought others into play very well while Lukaku spends most of his time in the box scoring tap-ins. Missing plenty too. He's very young and players of his ilk typically develop late but at the moment he's still nowhere near ready to be playing for a top club, IMO.
He looks seriously raw to me. Poor timing of his runs, poor hold-up play, inconsistent finishing and just a lack of all-round intelligence. His 2nd goal was just terrible defending (ask Fedirici, he was raging at how easy it was) and that's pretty much his only move coming off the wing.
^ This, another extension of his loan at WBA would be good for him.
He looks seriously raw to me. Poor timing of his runs, poor hold-up play, inconsistent finishing and just a lack of all-round intelligence. His 2nd goal was just terrible defending (ask Fedirici, he was raging at how easy it was) and that's pretty much his only move coming off the wing.
Agree with this. Though I think he has already made significant improvements during his time at WBA and is gradually adapting to life in the PL. Not sure what direction his Chelsea career will take, I reckon another season out on loan is definitely needed.
He looks seriously raw to me. Poor timing of his runs, poor hold-up play, inconsistent finishing and just a lack of all-round intelligence. His 2nd goal was just terrible defending (ask Fedirici, he was raging at how easy it was) and that's pretty much his only move coming off the wing.
I completely disagree. Quite surprisingly he seems to be a very good dribbler and his second goal yesterday certainly wasn't a tap in. IMO he's already better than Ba or at least as good as him
If Chelsea just go and buy in a forward over the summer do you think Lukaku should push for a move? What sort of valuation would you say?
Didn't they pay about £20m for him? He's been fantastic, but surely couldn't demand much more than that.
Chavs didn't need Ba in January. They should have called Lukaku back. They would have finished second and might have had an FA cup too.
12 million euros and a few million more in addons.
Overrated performance, makeshift back four with nothing to play for.