DOTA
wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Presuming they are performance related then we would certainly hope they do!Yes, and the total deal is potentially £90m ... and most add-ons end up being paid.
Presuming they are performance related then we would certainly hope they do!Yes, and the total deal is potentially £90m ... and most add-ons end up being paid.
There are doubts, but then again there were doubts regarding all of our potential markets, whether that's Morata, Belotti or Lukaku. There are many arguments to be made for Lukaku to be a success at United. Now it's just a matter of being positive and believing in those.
The good thing about Lukaku is how much he improved last season. That game against Bournemouth shows the player he is now. A really top centre forward. Still, he is not the finished article as proven with his performance against us at OT. But at least we are buying players for the future now.
Stop digging.A highly talented young French player that's 3RD choice for both LW and CF position in UTD on the on side. The richest French club that is always looking to sign top French talent and can offer them first team football in most cases, CL and trophies guaranteed every year, if your smart enough you can see potential PSG bid looming, especially considering they're probably shipping off Di Maria to Inter and Moura is also tagged for exit with Roma showing the biggest interest in him plus not to mention that Aubameyang deal failed.
A highly talented young French player that's 3RD choice for both LW and CF position in UTD on the on side. The richest French club that is always looking to sign top French talent and can offer them first team football in most cases, CL and trophies guaranteed every year, if your smart enough you can see potential PSG bid looming, especially considering they're probably shipping off Di Maria to Inter and Moura is also tagged for exit with Roma showing the biggest interest in him plus not to mention that Aubameyang deal failed.
Anyone else not terribly excited about Lukaku?
I think my problem is that with every big signing I seem to rate it by asking, "Would Fergie have signed him?"
I think he's just a big lump. Can you see him forcing one in in the 92nd minute? I don't.
He scored 25 league goals last year. Would love to see against who against.
His stats:
0.46 goals per game
45% on target
60 big chances missed
Last season
0.5 goals per game
50% on target
8 big chances missed
£75m for the sake of buying someone, or indeed so someone else doesn't sign him.
Incredibly uninspiring.
So if you had a new job where you had the possibility of earning bonuses you would include those bonuses when you quoted your salary?Add-ons are additional monies that usually end up being paid.
I'm not sure why there is so much push-back on the £90m figure, unless it's embarrassment.
Against Bournemouth. Exactly.
Fixed*The table would look rather different if you convert it to a statistic that makes Kane look better.
No, I always use the total fee, including all potential add-ons .... because in most cases the add-ons end up being paid.
I don't include agents fees, because usually these are not individually cited.
Add-ons are additional monies that usually end up being paid.
I'm not sure why there is so much push-back on the £90m figure, unless it's embarrassment.
No, it doesn't.
It cites "an initial £75m", and then cites "£15m in add-ons". Add-ons are not part of any initial fee.
Yes, and it's quite clear that the deal is £75m initially, plus £15m in potential add-ons.
No - we're citing the deal reported by the BBC, which is £75m + an additional potential £15m. The question you should be asking is why so many United fans are trying to deny these figures.
Yes, and the total deal is potentially £90m ... and most add-ons end up being paid.
The table would look rather different if you convert it to goals-scored-per-minutes played.
The table would look rather different if you convert it to goals-scored-per-minutes played.
On July 2nd after neighbours called the cops regarding a noisy house party. He wasn't charged, or even taken to the police station. Wonder why it's taken until now to emerge.Reports of him being arrested in LA for disturbing the peace. Not sure if true yet.
I was about to post about this too. Their all round play is different, but of a similar level. Kane scores more because he has better players around him but I don't see a big difference either way.
If Lukaku is worth £75m then Kane is worth £70-80m. He'll go for more when he goes because Levy and English tax, but that's the only big difference.
Glaston just worries a lot about us mismanaging our finances.Someone seems awfully bothered about Manchester United buying Lukaku.
Good to hear, Also, I have just read that all that happened was they gave him a citation.On July 2nd after neighbours called the cops regarding a noisy house party. He wasn't charged, or even taken to the police station. Wonder why it's taken until now to emerge.
Oh, and why is a Spurs fan in here arguing about the fee?
He cares about business more than he cares about football. I don't know why he doesn't just support McDonalds or Coca-Cola.Someone seems awfully bothered about Manchester United buying Lukaku.
It amazes me how he always gets caught up in such interesting discussionsGlaston just worries a lot about us mismanaging our finances.
So if you had a new job where you had the possibility of earning bonuses you would include those bonuses when you quoted your salary?
I don't know why there is so much desperation on your part to inflate the price. Perhaps it's disappointment that we haven't blown nearly as much money as you would have hoped.
who cares really though?Seeing as Lukaku is costing £90m, I can only wonder at Kane's valuation.
So by arrested they mean, not arrested.Looks like he might have a different transfer first.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/romelu-lukaku-arrested-los-angeles-10758840
It's confusing seeing people talking to themselves, until I realise they're actually replying to that WUM GlastonSpur. The ignore feature is wonderful, I highly recommend it.
Aye. Looks like a yellow card.So by arrested they mean, not arrested.
Potential. So the fee is not 90mil is it? It's not difficult to comprehend. This is what you said.:I'm not inflating then price. I'm citing the total potential fee, which I always do for all players for all clubs whenever I cite fees.
Seeing as Lukaku is costing £90m, I can only wonder at Kane's valuation.
Lol ... check the goals-scored-per-minutes-played stats.
Potential. So the fee is not 90mil is it? It's not difficult to comprehend.
The table would look rather different if you convert it to goals-scored-per-minutes played.
This is what you said:Never mind. You don't like the £90m figure. I get it.
Is costing, 'is'. Now tell me how that, in any way, nods to a potential price?Seeing as Lukaku is costing £90m, I can only wonder at Kane's valuation.
Take out the pens.
Last two seasons goals from open play:
Lukaku 23+ 17=40
Kane 25 + 20 =45
Assists
Kane 8
Lukaku 12
Goals and Assists combined.
52v 53.
Not much in it.
Take out the pens.
Last two seasons goals from open play:
Lukaku 23+ 17=40
Kane 25 + 20 =45
Assists
Lukaku 12
Kane 8
Goals and Assists combined.
52v 53.
Not much in it.
WumtasticI see, take out the pens. Then switch from starting in 2012-13 (as compared to the original post) to just looking at the last 2 seasons. Then add in assists rather than just goals. And hey presto ....
Seeing as Lukaku is costing £90m, I can only wonder at Kane's valuation.