Paxi
Dagestani MMA Boiled Egg Expert
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2017
- Messages
- 27,678
He's quality for Belgium.
Are people still slagging Lukaku off?
If you look at his highlights reel for United this season, he can actually be brilliant on the ball as much as anything else. I think this seems to have gone unnoticed by a lot of people.
He has moments where he shows excellent skill and control on the ball but the issue is that he is still too inconsistent as far as use of the ball is concerned. He has improved no doubt but he still has plenty to work on. Also, most of his brilliance on the ball is after he has got it under control. But majority of the time in tight spaces, the ball is stolen off him before he can bring it under his control.Are people still slagging Lukaku off?
If you look at his highlights reel for United this season, he can actually be brilliant on the ball as much as anything else. I think this seems to have gone unnoticed by a lot of people.
thats a big ask mate. Salah barely did this in a gung ho team! RVN only did this once with Beckham, Scholes and Co. Harry Kane could not manage this once in an attacking team.He's turning into a top top striker. I think his game has improved massively in the 12 months he's had at United.
I've loved his attitude this season at United, he's had it tough, lots of criticism, at times very little service, and he's banged in over 30 goals this season for club and country. The best thing is you can just sense he has lots more in him and he has the ability to stretch to 40+ a season.
I'd like to see him trim down a little, for all of his muscle and strength, he actually doesn't use it that much and he likes the ball at his feet to turn and run, or to poach. If he could trim down and speed up he could reach another level.
I've had a little bet on him each way as top scorer - pays if he's one of the top four scorers. Agreed - fantastic value.I think he’s 20/1 to be top scorer at the WC. Looks like value to me.
United fans without an agenda will have noticed this already, but there you go.
thats a big ask mate. Salah barely did this in a gung ho team! RVN only did this once with Beckham, Scholes and Co. Harry Kane could not manage this once in an attacking team.
It’s that easy, huh?Sign lewy from Bayern that’s who we need!
I know it's a friendly and against Costa Rica but he had a super game. Looking past his 2 goals and assist, the particular skill at 5:40 is just
His technical skills, in particular dribbling, is quite underrated I would say.
I am sorry but I wouldn’t call this a super game. Yes, if we were to look at stats alone, 2 goals and 1 assist is great. But the amount of chances and half chances he missed before he got his first goal was a little too much. Unfortunately for him, this current united team does not create enough for him to be a “1 in 3” kind of a striker for us.
He's turning into a top top striker. I think his game has improved massively in the 12 months he's had at United.
I've loved his attitude this season at United, he's had it tough, lots of criticism, at times very little service, and he's banged in over 30 goals this season for club and country. The best thing is you can just sense he has lots more in him and he has the ability to stretch to 40+ a season.
I'd like to see him trim down a little, for all of his muscle and strength, he actually doesn't use it that much and he likes the ball at his feet to turn and run, or to poach. If he could trim down and speed up he could reach another level.
Less muscle = slower.
Why does this nonsense kick around?
I am sorry but I wouldn’t call this a super game. Yes, if we were to look at stats alone, 2 goals and 1 assist is great. But the amount of chances and half chances he missed before he got his first goal was a little too much. Unfortunately for him, this current united team does not create enough for him to be a “1 in 3” kind of a striker for us.
I am sorry but I wouldn’t call this a super game. Yes, if we were to look at stats alone, 2 goals and 1 assist is great. But the amount of chances and half chances he missed before he got his first goal was a little too much. Unfortunately for him, this current united team does not create enough for him to be a “1 in 3” kind of a striker for us.
I think he was saying less muscle = faster, not slower.
Everybody including Ronaldo and Messi miss many chances, or keeper save those. The difference is they consistently get into those positions, which Lukaku did in this game. I don't know what you are complaining about!
Yes. That's the nonsense I'm talking about.
Less muscle results in a less explosive and slower player. Not a faster one. Basic physiology.
You can add 5/10/20/30/50 metre metrics but it's not until you hit thousands of metre endurance events that weight becomes a factor.
And for those that say footballers cover 7-11km a game : this is true for Sunday League players too, albeit at a slower pace.
Lukaku is shaped like a perfect centre forward of his type. Like Drogba, Vieri, Shearer, Costa & any other black, white or multicoloured player you can mention.
He's a big boy. For good reason. Being slimmer would make him worse, not better. And certainly
Not faster.
Yes. That's the nonsense I'm talking about.
Less muscle results in a less explosive and slower player. Not a faster one. Basic physiology.
You can add 5/10/20/30/50 metre metrics but it's not until you hit thousands of metre endurance events that weight becomes a factor.
And for those that say footballers cover 7-11km a game : this is true for Sunday League players too, albeit at a slower pace.
Lukaku is shaped like a perfect centre forward of his type. Like Drogba, Vieri, Shearer, Costa & any other black, white or multicoloured player you can mention.
He's a big boy. For good reason. Being slimmer would make him worse, not better. And certainly
Not faster.
Yeah. He's really a top pro. I had asked a friend who's a season ticket holder at Everton and he said he'll score a lot of goals but now he's at a big club and his work ethic or lack thereof will frustrate you. Easily one of our hardest working players and completely selfless. He really put the team ahead of himself and showed real development and improvement to his overall game and not just the goals.Rom has completely won me over. I was firmly in the Harry Kane camp last season, especially during his dry spell.
It was actually when I saw him live at Old Trafford I really noticed his overall game play that the cameras don't always pick up. He's workrate on the pitch and training late is a perfect example of a proper professional.
As his manager's comments above point out, his overall play and ability has improved loads since signing.
Cheeky bet for top goal scorer.
Drug order shipped and sold by Illuminati delivered?
Less muscle = slower.
Why does this nonsense kick around?
Yes. That's the nonsense I'm talking about.
Less muscle results in a less explosive and slower player. Not a faster one. Basic physiology.
You can add 5/10/20/30/50 metre metrics but it's not until you hit thousands of metre endurance events that weight becomes a factor.
And for those that say footballers cover 7-11km a game : this is true for Sunday League players too, albeit at a slower pace.
Lukaku is shaped like a perfect centre forward of his type. Like Drogba, Vieri, Shearer, Costa & any other black, white or multicoloured player you can mention.
He's a big boy. For good reason. Being slimmer would make him worse, not better. And certainly
Not faster.
Lol, you think Lukaku at 25 is the same build/size/weight as Drogba, Vieri, Shearer and Costa were at 25 years of age?
That my friend is nonsense.
I've played sport and trained in the gym for years, and the stockier with muscle I get on the upper body, the slower I can run. The more I trim down on the upper body, the faster I can run. It's simple.
I've weight trained for about 12 years and I can run much faster now at the age of 30 at 6 ft 3 90kg guy than I could as a much musclier 24 year old at 105kg. This, despite probably losing a yard of pace due to age. Yet I score higher on beep tests. Why? Because there is less muscle mass on my upper body weighing me down.
This is a simple logic that most people know. Yet you're calling it... nonsense?
If Lukaku lost a stone in upper body muscle mass yet maintained his legs, you think he'd... be... slower? Really?
He doesn't use his upper body muscle to win headers or outstrength opponents, he uses a quick turn and a great finish and poacher abilities to score 30 goals a season, so I don't see what harm dropping a stone in muscle mass would ever have on his game other than give him an extra yard of pace.
I remember that. Also, this puts him up close to Bale's top speeds on the pitchI imagine this was the run where he passed it to himself.