I'd like to see Rashford up front for a bit.
Or lack of...that's his worst aspect, don't mind occasional bad touch but that element should be fixed sharpish. Zlatan with all his age had a much better movement in and around the box, obviously he could no longer run the channels. By the way his poor movement goes unseen on a TV, so I understand those who can't see it and reckon it's merely an agenda.
Yeah. Will make ppl appreciate Lukaku more hopefully
Can see him not playing the next 2 matches but getting some minutes in Watford game to be ready for the final.
What a weird thing to hope for. Personally, I hope he smashes it and scores a hat-trick, being a United player and all. I appreciate Lukaku plenty anyway.
Nothing he has done in that position this season suggests he will. The obsession with some wanting him to start at the top really boggles the mind. Especially as some want him in there instead of Lukaku who has been fantastic for us.
16 league goals - and he’s «fantastic». I wonder what kind of superlatives you would use for a proper striker that scores almost a goal a game or more, like the best ones do. Lukaku hasn’t been fantastic, cut the crap, his returns are mediocre for a top club and he needs to raise his game next season.
16 league goals - and he’s «fantastic». I wonder what kind of superlatives you would use for a proper striker that scores almost a goal a game or more, like the best ones do. Lukaku hasn’t been fantastic, cut the crap, his returns are mediocre for a top club and he needs to raise his game next season.
16 league goals - and he’s «fantastic». I wonder what kind of superlatives you would use for a proper striker that scores almost a goal a game or more, like the best ones do. Lukaku hasn’t been fantastic, cut the crap, his returns are mediocre for a top club and he needs to raise his game next season.
I agree, I personally dont think he's good enough. You cant rely on him. His chance in the first leg of the Sevilla game summed him up, he went to side foot volley the ball from a very promising position. We don't help our strikers with how we play, but I'm much more in the camp of having a dynamic striker.I'm sorry but he doesn't score enough in the league. Next season he has got to hit 25 minimum if not we will have problems competing.
Cup Comps he is doing well though.
Can you name any Manchester United striker who ever achieved that sort of strike rate? Because, if not, you're implying we've never had a "proper striker" at this club. I would beg to differ.
I agree, I personally dont think he's good enough. You cant rely on him. His chance in the first leg of the Sevilla game summed him up, he went to side foot volley the ball from a very promising position. We don't help our strikers with how we play, but I'm much more in the camp of having a dynamic striker.
The less said about his record in big games the better, one goal versus Chelsea doesn't; change that.
First of all, you don't need the top-scorer in the league to win the league - but you need the goals. We are focusing a whole lot on Lukaku to score the goals since he is the sole focal point - and he hasn't delivered. Furthermore - what happened when we won the league in the 90's doesn't really matter now, you play what's in front of you and behind you in the table, you just have to match it or be close to what's going on. I'm not bothered in terms of checking stats for every time we won the league and how many goals our top scorer had, but since you asked: Robin van Persie had 26 goals when we last won the league, which is a target we all wanted Lukaku to be at when he signed. "A goal a game on average" is more of a cliché saying, but when you're at 25 goals nobody can complain - I would have been happy with Lukaku at 23-25 at this stage. Granted, Lukaku still has games left to increase his 16 goals - but it's probably going to finish at below 20. Before Van Persie's season we had Berbatov on 20 goals when we won the league in 10-11. 20 goals was kind of low, but he was the top-scorer in the league that season. We won the league in 07-08, Ronaldo the top-scorer with 31 goals. As mentioned above, we don't need the guy scoring the most goals every year (as long as the goals are coming in elsewhere), but when people are delivering 30 goals you need to be better than 16-18 goals. It's just very simple.
No one disagree about him needing to score more league goals next season but we're useless upfront without him. Even when not scoring he provides physical presence upfront that occupies defenders and give space to other players around him. He's a!so our only players that seems useful when drifting to the right. With Rashford as a striker we look clueless.
Can you name any Manchester United striker who ever achieved that sort of strike rate? Because, if not, you're implying we've never had a "proper striker" at this club. I would beg to differ.
Lukaku has played nearly every minute of every game we have played in the league and the CL. So how can you justify comments on other players up front when we haven't played anybody else up front for longer than 20 minutes on Sunday ? The only two league games he hasn't started we've actually looked really good.
There's been PLENTY of games where we have looked clueless with Lukaku as our striker. Plenty of times he's looked clueless himself. His goal output is below Jamie Vardie and one above Firmino and his goals per minute ratio is higher than all the other recognised strikers on the list of top scorers. His main strength this season has been occupying defenders, winning flick ons and delivering excellent crosses from out wide on occasion. But he's played all season. No one else has had a look in. Pretty hard to knock a young player when he hasn't had a genuine chance.
16 league goals for a striker who's started all but two league games is underwhelming and his recent performances, since his run of good form, City Spurs semi West Brom Arsenal, have also been underwhelming as is his goal return of 1 in the last five games.
Nice edit btw, to swerve the Everton game.
What happened against Arsenal was exactly what happened against South in December when Lukaku got injured and we had to continue the game with Rashford up front. We looked clueless as just as what happened in second half against Arsenal. Rahsford in terrible when it comes to holding up the ball and bringing others to the play against tight defnses and parked buses. He's only good in running the channels against open defenses.
You don't seem to have anything to have your discussion on except those 16 goals. Ok we know it he needs to score more goals in the league and no one is saying he's having the best season ever but posters like you go on and talk as if he should receive zero credit for anything and is our games. There's more to the striker than just goals and this irnically what everyone wanted from Lukaku to improve, to not just be a poacherand but complain about it now.
Lukaku is a big reason why we're finishing second and in Fa Cup final. Whatever you like it or not it's reality.
What about the Everton game he didn't start in or the Bournemouth game he didn't start in ? There are other ways to play football than using a target man.
I've give him credit for flick ons and crossing ability ? So I'm missing the point of most of your reply.
As for other things I've mentioned them previously, his first touch is often atrocious, like really atrocious though. His movement is not great, not from the stretford end at least. His interplay and Passing can be as poor as his first touch. So mainly I'm looking for goals from him, a bit like Andy Cole, you overlook the weaknesses and focus on the strengths. His goal scoring has been underwhelming over the season and also of late.
He's part of a team that will finish second. Lingard, Martial, Pogba and especially DeGea and Matic are also big reasons, some bigger reasons.
In any case I'm looking for better next season from all the players. Lukaku has a big job to improve if he's going to take us even close to the next level.
First of all, you don't need the top-scorer in the league to win the league - but you need the goals. We are focusing a whole lot on Lukaku to score the goals since he is the sole focal point - and he hasn't delivered. Furthermore - what happened when we won the league in the 90's doesn't really matter now, you play what's in front of you and behind you in the table, you just have to match it or be close to what's going on. I'm not bothered in terms of checking stats for every time we won the league and how many goals our top scorer had, but since you asked: Robin van Persie had 26 goals when we last won the league, which is a target we all wanted Lukaku to be at when he signed. "A goal a game on average" is more of a cliché saying, but when you're at 25 goals nobody can complain - I would have been happy with Lukaku at 23-25 at this stage. Granted, Lukaku still has games left to increase his 16 goals - but it's probably going to finish at below 20. Before Van Persie's season we had Berbatov on 20 goals when we won the league in 10-11. 20 goals was kind of low, but he was the top-scorer in the league that season. We won the league in 07-08, Ronaldo the top-scorer with 31 goals. As mentioned above, we don't need the guy scoring the most goals every year (as long as the goals are coming in elsewhere), but when people are delivering 30 goals you need to be better than 16-18 goals. It's just very simple.
I want him to suceed but not sure he will. We will be sticking with him as long as Jose is here.
That said I think he has shown enough that he should be our starting striker next season but if we don't start to see the numbers required questions should be asked.
What about the Everton game he didn't start in or the Bournemouth game he didn't start in ? There are other ways to play football than using a target man.
I've give him credit for flick ons and crossing ability ? So I'm missing the point of most of your reply.
As for other things I've mentioned them previously, his first touch is often atrocious, like really atrocious though. His movement is not great, not from the stretford end at least. His interplay and Passing can be as poor as his first touch. So mainly I'm looking for goals from him, a bit like Andy Cole, you overlook the weaknesses and focus on the strengths. His goal scoring has been underwhelming over the season and also of late.
He's part of a team that will finish second. Lingard, Martial, Pogba and especially DeGea and Matic are also big reasons, some bigger reasons.
In any case I'm looking for better next season from all the players. Lukaku has a big job to improve if he's going to take us even close to the next level.
30 goals in his first season. How many goals are you expecting him to score in 1 season?
Those three players (no matter how well they've played at times) have fcuk all to do with our league position when compared to Lukaku.
16 league goals - and he’s «fantastic». I wonder what kind of superlatives you would use for a proper striker that scores almost a goal a game or more, like the best ones do. Lukaku hasn’t been fantastic, cut the crap, his returns are mediocre for a top club and he needs to raise his game next season.
First of all, you don't need the top-scorer in the league to win the league - but you need the goals. We are focusing a whole lot on Lukaku to score the goals since he is the sole focal point - and he hasn't delivered. Furthermore - what happened when we won the league in the 90's doesn't really matter now, you play what's in front of you and behind you in the table, you just have to match it or be close to what's going on. I'm not bothered in terms of checking stats for every time we won the league and how many goals our top scorer had, but since you asked: Robin van Persie had 26 goals when we last won the league, which is a target we all wanted Lukaku to be at when he signed. "A goal a game on average" is more of a cliché saying, but when you're at 25 goals nobody can complain - I would have been happy with Lukaku at 23-25 at this stage. Granted, Lukaku still has games left to increase his 16 goals - but it's probably going to finish at below 20. Before Van Persie's season we had Berbatov on 20 goals when we won the league in 10-11. 20 goals was kind of low, but he was the top-scorer in the league that season. We won the league in 07-08, Ronaldo the top-scorer with 31 goals. As mentioned above, we don't need the guy scoring the most goals every year (as long as the goals are coming in elsewhere), but when people are delivering 30 goals you need to be better than 16-18 goals. It's just very simple.
I think about 10 other posters have pointed out that he doesn’t have 30 goals this season.
Most of the same posters have probably pointed out that they think 16 league goals is a poor return.
I think, and appreciate, that many will always look to back their own. Look for mitigation and such. That said, Lukaku has been playing in the PL for years, and I can’t remember too many people on here wanting us to sign him a year ago. We all knew his strengths and weaknesses. I don’t think it’s that ridiculous that some still didn’t want us to sign him. After all, if they had told you that a year ago today, I suspect you would have agreed with them. Today, the argument becomes different. It’s a typical forum war between ‘moaners who are constantly criticising our players’ and those who feel it is their civic duty as a fan to back anyone who wears our shirt in an internet debate. And some who have probably long thought Lukaku was genuinely good enough for United, of course.
I’m sure, for instance, far less people would care if McTominay slipped away quietly to another club in the summer than would have a go at me if, in a discussion about McTominay, I said I didn’t think he was a good player. It would be even worse if i mentioned a young player at a rival club who I think is better than him. I think that’s kinda how it goes.
Almost 30 and we still have 4 games left to play. 26 goals and 7 assists in all competitions is not a bad total. Especially with the way the team plays. Put any striker in the league in this teams set up and they will be lucky to have a higher goal and assist totals than Lukaku. Besides, as Mourinho has stated, Lukaku brings more to the team than just goals.
Ok I'm open to the idea of this, but why ?
Well it's just my view of it obviously but:
While you can point to a game or two where those players were match winners, Lukaku has consistently put the goals aways (alongwith some very underrated hold-up play and creative work) while playing almost every match. The last point needs to be emphasised - some people seem to use it as a criticism but I'm delighted we have a striker that stays fit and is always available.
For clarity, the way I look at it is that this season we've had a spine of De Gea, Matic and Lukaku. That's really what has driven us up the table. Other players have played their part but not to the same significance as those three (or four including Smalling).
Lukaku's made 45 starts (and 5 sub appearances), and has the most amount of goals (27) with 10 assists. Fair enough in the league alone, it's only 16 from 33 starts but he's basically scoring every other start. That's a pretty strong contribution no matter what criticism people may want to give him. As mentioned before, we've won titles previously with way less effective strikers.
Pogba (of the three you mentioned) is the only fair shout. Only that I don't think he's been that key due to his missing appearances due to injury/suspension/personal issues. He's only been involved in 70% of our league matches which for one of your key players isn't brilliant (no matter what he contributed in those games). I mean as a comparison with the team above us, De Bruyne has barely missed a match (don't think he has).
Lingard has done very well at times this year but in the end ~40% of the time, he's been coming off the bench. And it's pretty much the same story for Martial (might be a 1% difference). Doesn't matter how many goals they've nicked along the way or whatever - I know Lingard did brilliantly against Arsenal and Martial got the winner against Spurs etc. They're still clearly not the spine of the team that has made the progress up the table. They're rotational options that have spells in the side.
So I'm not saying they're useless, lacking talent or anything like that. I'm saying compared to Lukaku, they're no where near the key reasons/performers for why we've made progress. For me that's the trio of Dave, Matic and Lukaku.
TLDR:
Simply by League Starts:- Lukaku (94%) being our top goalscorer clearly has more to do with our progress up the table than Pogba (65%), Lingard (54%) or Martial (48%). They've played their part for sure but they're not the critical reasons for progress.