VorZakone
What would Kenny G do?
- Joined
- May 9, 2013
- Messages
- 36,985
Told ya, turns draws into wins.
Great video this talks about how even though he doesnt run that much he makes the right runs and how the players here help him to be better than at Everton.
Also dont get your knickers in a twist about Henry, Lukaku said himself it makes himself a better player when he picks out the negatives in his game.
Great video this talks about how even though he doesnt run that much he makes the right runs and how the players here help him to be better than at Everton.
Also dont get your knickers in a twist about Henry, Lukaku said himself it makes himself a better player when he picks out the negatives in his game.
Yes. I've never known a striker to be put under such intense scrutiny on their first league game for their new club.The problem I have is Henry was obviously sent out to criticise Lukaku no matter what. It kind of looks stupid when he played so well so maybe they should have called an audible
Yeah his pace is a real asset, my old man was surprised how fast he actually is I think its underrated purely because he's such a beast.Yes. I've never known a striker to be put under such intense scrutiny on their first league game for their new club.
Thought he played well and I liked his desire to get to the ball for the first goal. I liked Zlat but it was refreshing to have a big man up top who also has pace.
What does Real Madrid have to do with it? We played them in two meaningless friendlies, and I thought the point of the board was to discuss things not just everyone holding hands and singing because we won a game.
Oh so the super cup is a meaningless friendly? Seemed to me both teams wanted to win it badly. Obviously you think you know better....
enjoyed that too .... was almost as delicate as a ballet dancer!He's sure to score bucketloads of goals in the league but my favourite moment from the game was his almost nonchalant flick to Pogba. Didn't know he had that in him. If he's able to do that on a regular basis then he'll be a genuinely elite striker.
Henry can do one. Alan Shearer gave far more insightful analysis on MOTD. Called it a 'complete CF performance' backed up with stats etc.The problem I have is Henry was obviously sent out to criticise Lukaku no matter what. It kind of looks stupid when he played so well so maybe they should have called an audible
Did about as well as could be expected on his league debut for us. Still concerned about the frequency he loses the ball but hope he takes Henry's criticism on board and improve in that regard.
The header was a beauty. That was one attack move that we often failed to capitalise on in the past, may it continues.
Oh so the super cup is a meaningless friendly? Seemed to me both teams wanted to win it badly. Obviously you think you know better....
As a practicing Christian, has no real 'bad habits' to distract him so literally lives and breathes to play top level football.
He is now playing with better players and training with better coaches in better facilities. He stated in his joining interview how he constantly studies VDO's of previous great strikers as well as always analyse his previous performance and is his own harshest critic.
I have no doubt he will improve maybe 50% from what we have seen today. On top of that, the team will learn to get on his wavelength.
He will be the tip of our arrow for years to come. Imagine how good he will become!
Hernandez was all of those things and while I love the little lesbian looking chump to bits, his poor ball control never really left him despite the fact that he did make a visible improvement in link up place during his time with us.
Lukaku is here now and I sincerely hope that he'd take that step up to become a truly elite footballer, but it's as true now as it was one day, one week or one month ago that there's a question mark regarding whether he'll get there.
Took both his goals well and I think everyone knew he's score against these type of teams, but his technical issues and link up play needs to be worked on a lot.
It's strange that you basically can't hold a proper discussion on any aspect brought up, we've bought a guy that you pump balls to and hope to get on the counter despite most teams playing too deep against us for that to ever be effective, you certainly don't play good football on the ground with a #9 that has the first touch of an Elephant.
So much for the stat that he doesn't score goals that win points. His first 2 goals set us on easy street. Delighted so far.
It was always a silly stat to use in the first place. If you really look for a problem, you'll find numbers to back up something. Next year I wouldn't be surprised to see some stat related to him not scoring in last 10 minutes of the game or not scoring enough from outside of the box or higher minutes per goal than some average striker somewhere. It's almost like people tend to concentrate on trivial micro stats than a quite simple yet the most powerful stat that is the number of goals scored in a season.
Do you think it's fair to say this wasn't entirely true, given yesterday's performance?
Of course we can't assume that we'll play like that all season, nor can we expect the opposition to perform so poorly, but you were very definitive in your stance that you can't play good football with someone like Lukaku...despite substantial historical evidence and now current indications to the contrary.
This is why I wanted him. He's by no means my favourite player to watch but he's more clinical than Zlatan. He may struggle in the big games but something we've sorely lacked for a long time is a player who can just punish the weaker teams in the league.
No, I thought he showed power and pace and the ability to run in behind yesterday which we knew were his strengths, and I thought his movement was better than it often was with Everton, he wasn't standing around waiting, he was proactive. However technically I thought the deficiencies were still evident in his touch, and there's no real hold up play or the ability to bring others into play or run with the ball without it getting caught up in his feet, I know you liked that one flick he did.
I thought yesterday was powerhouse football, very direct, very Mourinho, if you deem that entertaining or attractive, then fair enough.
I would say the vast majority of neutral fans - which I suppose you now are - would describe that as entertaining and attractive football. I'm sure you could find lots of neutral journalists supporting that view. To think otherwise suggests a very close-minded and illogical view on what good football is, IMO, given the history of the sport and the variety of styles that have been on display throughout the ages. Your idea of good football is something that didn't exist in most generations of the sport so to limit it to that bizarrely tightly defined definition is counterproductive at an individual and group level.