Summit
"do the dead, spread your seed and get out"
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2011
- Messages
- 51,051
RvP will start scoring soon, mark my words. He's too good not to. World class player.
He's a brilliant player but I don't see a place for him in this United team.
Oh come on ffs. If he had put away that pass from di maria in the top corner like we know he can do, then you wouldn't be posting that. Fine margins...
overreaction.
What would you like me to hold?Get a hold lad. I've been of this opinion since Falcao's arrival. He's the least dynamic forward we have, the oldest, the most susceptible to injury and could potentially serve to the slowing down of our football. Again, he's brilliant, but we have other brilliant players, as well as a captain that will not be dropped and looks a better fit for the system.
Van Persie will rifle in a scorcher some time soon, I'm fully aware of that, but I'm looking at the bigger picture here.
Still does not mean its not total bollox. The more you say something does not make it true.See above. Been saying it all week. Well in.
Still does not mean its not total bollox. The more you say something does not make it true.
Agreed. I've also said a few times that I don't think he really fits the way we should be looking to play.Get a hold lad. I've been of this opinion since Falcao's arrival. He's the least dynamic forward we have, the oldest, the most susceptible to injury and could potentially serve to the slowing down of our football. Again, he's brilliant, but we have other brilliant players, as well as a captain that will not be dropped and looks a better fit for the system.
Van Persie will rifle in a scorcher some time soon, I'm fully aware of that, but I'm looking at the bigger picture here.
As much as I like him Falcao should start the next game.
He wasnt bad but he wasnt particulary good either.Why change something that's working? It's not like RVP was bad
van Persie in any partnership doesn't work.He wasnt bad but he wasnt particulary good either.
RVP-Rooney partnership doesnt exactly work.
He wasnt bad but he wasnt particulary good either.
RVP-Rooney partnership doesnt exactly work.
Why is it bollocks? I think in Rooney, Falcao and Mata we have a younger, fitter - therefore more reliable - and more balanced attacking trio. Thus, I don't see a place for an albeit brilliant footballer in our best first team going forward.
He'll get chances, he'll most likely play very well when he does play, and he'll certainly score goals, but only a goon would think I was disputing that. A 31 year old that spent the majority of last season injured is certainly the player we should look to be marginalising, if that's what we have to do one of the much-discussed quartet.
The age brigade out again, I imagine you were one of the mindless fans calling for Giggs to be phased out at 31? He went on to play some of his best football in his early to mid 30's.
As for RVP based on how rusty Falcao looked today and after his crippling injuries I would be more worried about him. RVP has had nowhere near the severity of injuries that Falcao has.
If LVG is sensible he will ignore footballing experts such as yourself and rotate the team so they all get roughly the same game time and therefore are fresh for the big tests this season. People seem quick to forget we put 4 past the lowest ranked team in the championship of the 3 that came up.
They weren't exactly playing as a traditional strike partnership though. And Falcao didn't exactly do much to put himself ahead of RVP
My opinion on Giggs ten years ago has nothing to do with this discussion. But evaluating the age of a squad and looking to marginalise a quality 31 year old with an injury history ahead of a quality 25 year old that does not have an injury history, if that's what needs to be done, is simply sensible squad management.
I've offered an opinion on Van Persie and attempted to discuss my reasoning. If you're going to rabbit on with that "footballing expert" crack though, then just feck off and don't waste my time with your wanky replies.
Lets not get childish and try and use insults, I am just saying Falcao has had far worse injuries (those that can end careers) than RVP. I would be making sure neither are over used. With regards to age Falcao and RVP are only a few years apart age wise and I would personally judge their respective fitness/injury levels based on scientific facts not age numbers. I assume you know not all players age the same in football, some peak early some have amazing longevity?
I didn't insult you but no worries, apologies for the tense reply. I take your point in regards to Falcao's injury record, but here's hoping. And going forward, with the new man being brought in, I'm going to assume he has a big part to play here. Horrendous form aside, which I'm sure won't be the case, he'll be lining up every week. I think Rooney is in a similar situation. To me, it looks like a straight shootout between Van Persie and Mata if we are to pick a best first XI. Personally, I'd be looking to give that spot to Mata, get him fit and firing, and using Rooney and Falcao's dynamism to exploit defences.
I haven't really written Van Persie off completely. I've stressed he's a brilliant player, one that will still score a lot of goals here. But I'm trying to look at the bigger picture. The kind of team I would like us to be is a fast one that will terrify defenders. I just don't think Van Persie, particularly when he's partnered with Rooney, is the answer for that future. I've said enough now, people can feel free to simply disagree.