Remember the geese
Full Member
Campbell was better than Terry too, but for some reason history hasn't been as kind to him. Maybe doesn't help that he's completely full of himself too.
He definitely wasn’t, but he was a great aggressive defenderVidic was better than all of them.
Terry wasn’t even the best defender at Chelsea during that time. Carvalho was betterCampbell was better than Terry too, but for some reason history hasn't been as kind to him. Maybe doesn't help that he's completely full of himself too.
For context.
Rio's List:
1. Rio Ferdinand
2. Nemanja Vidic
3. Virgil van Dijk
4. Jaap Stam
5. John Terry
Van Dijk's List:
1. Rio Ferdinand
2. Vincent Kompany
3. Jaap Stam
4. John Terry
5. Sami Hyypia
Carvalho was definitely the classier player.Terry wasn’t even the best defender at Chelsea during that time. Carvalho was better
Fair play Rio knows his standing!For context.
Rio's List:
1. Rio Ferdinand
2. Nemanja Vidic
3. Virgil van Dijk
4. Jaap Stam
5. John Terry
Van Dijk's List:
1. Rio Ferdinand
2. Vincent Kompany
3. Jaap Stam
4. John Terry
5. Sami Hyypia
Why not? Ronaldo would do exactly the same thing if he was asked.Why would anyone put himself at nr 1
I do understand, I just pity people that do. Life must be a bit cack if you take yourself that seriously.Why not? Ronaldo would do exactly the same thing if he was asked.
I doubt it if he ever saw the likes Scirea or Bobby moore play so he'll probably just day he didn't get to watch them all.Fair play Rio knows his standing!
Would live to see hin expand it to the all-timers and see where he places himself. Where he ranks himself next to the gods.
Terry embarrasses himself on Twitter on a regular basis. Constantly retweeting praise from any random he can find.
Reeks of insecurity.
I reckon he was.
I've always thought Rio was extremely talented but a bit of a bottler. Vidic was the rock back there we needed which is why he became Captain. Rio was never captain material at any point in his career.
We won our first PL title in 4 years in Vidic's first full season and then totally dominated afterwards. Our attack was great in this period also but it was our defence which was truly legendary.
We once went 12 games in the league without conceding a single goal.
Van der Sar played a big part also but I think Vidic was the catalyst. He had that inner drive and determination only the true leaders have.
Overall, I'd say Ferdinand was slightly more talented but Vidic had a lot more to him than just talent.
Both were excellent but Rio gets regularly overrated whereas Vidic gets underrated. It's just the English media's way.
Stam was better than Rio also.
Nesta, Maldini, Baresi, Kohler: he's seen these guys play. I guess I'm more curious of his opinion next to a contemporary such as Nesta, actually as that's the pinnacle and I would be interested in Rio's views vis a vis that level.I doubt it if he ever saw the likes Scirea or Bobby moore play so he'll probably just day he didn't get to watch them all.
Ferdinand and Terry are 1 and 2 in my opinion. Anyone claiming either is miles better than the other can't be taken seriously. Vidic in 3. Van Dijk 4. Kompany 5
Would be interesting indeed, he does have a podcast so that would come up eventually.Nesta, Maldini, Baresi, Kohler: he's seen these guys play. I guess I'm more curious of his opinion next to a contemporary such as Nesta, actually as that's the pinnacle and I would be interested in Rio's views vis a vis that level.
Anyway I baressi and Maldini are clear in my eyes (not really contemporaries anyway), he was better than kohler.
Nesta would be the more interesting one, Nesta was probably more complete but I could see a case in ranking rio above him.
I rate Campbell a lot higher than Terry. Him and Rio were England's best CB pair.Rio > Terry > VVD > Vidic > Stam > Carvalho/Adams/Campbell
Stam?
Hope it comes up. There's never a case for Rio being better than Nesta(!) , but I would be interested in how you have it.Would be interesting indeed, he does have a podcast so that would come up eventually.
https://www.kickoff.com/news/articl...d-i-was-the-best-defender-in-the-world/578412
He also seems to rate himself quite high so doesn't really lack self esteem in that regard.
Anyway I baressi and Maldini are clear in my eyes (not really contemporaries anyway), he was better than kohler.
Nesta would be the more interesting one, Nesta was probably more complete but I could see a case in ranking rio above him.
Being the greatest of all time in one very specific area doesn't really make you the better player, overall I feel rio was better but its fine margins at that point.Kohler and Rio are very different in terms of style, but given that Kohler is arguably the greatest man-marker of all time and Rio really isn't close to being the greatest ever in his category/ies - then no, I'd say not.
As for Nesta, nobody but United fans will dream of ranking him below Rio.
Why not? False modesty is annoying thing. IF he thinks that he is the best (and general opinion is that he has credentials to think that) then why not say it?Why would anyone put himself at nr 1
For me, (regarding players who i watched), Maldini is the goat defender. Without question for meWould be interesting indeed, he does have a podcast so that would come up eventually.
https://www.kickoff.com/news/articl...d-i-was-the-best-defender-in-the-world/578412
He also seems to rate himself quite high so doesn't really lack self esteem in that regard.
Anyway I baressi and Maldini are clear in my eyes (not really contemporaries anyway), he was better than kohler.
Nesta would be the more interesting one, Nesta was probably more complete but I could see a case in ranking rio above him.
I myself really don't care about it if anyone does it as he's free to rank himself however he wants and as you say has the credentials for but it can come of as egotistical if you rank yourself as the best of your generation and aren't far ahead of anyone else like say cryuff or Maradona.Why not? False modesty is annoying thing. IF he thinks that he is the best (and general opinion is that he has credentials to think that) then why not say it?
I remember a video I seen of him in a show where they bring up different jerseys to him and he seemed to be talking quite highly of barresi so he'll probably have no problem ranking the guys whom he sees as idols above himself (my memory might be failing me so I have to check), I also feel he would be more inclined to give the players from other leagues their due as there is no existing beef between them as there is in the English league.Hope it comes up. There's never a case for Rio being better than Nesta(!) , but I would be interested in how you have it.
I think the issue here is the next level up, is precisely that; Kohler's there on merit easily one of the best of all-time.
I actually like the fact he has the awareness to rank himself above others - I would like to see if he has the capacity to rank himself below others, too.
Then you indeed rank him extremely high as many people have Baresi as the defacto best center back in history!For me, (regarding players who i watched), Maldini is the goat defender. Without question for me
After him it is battle between Baresi, Rio and Nesta.
Yeah, i rate Rio that high
Then you indeed rank him extremely high as many people have Baresi as the defacto best center back in history!
Wish we could have anything even coming close to that Rio vidic partnership in this current United side.
Good times.Regardless of where you rank Big Tommy Robinson JT, the fact that this grown man has chucked his toys out because someone had him in their top 5 but not first, wtf is he crying about. Along with Barton he's the biggest bell to ever put on a pair of boots in the prem.
Fair play Rio knows his standing!
Would live to see hin expand it to the all-timers and see where he places himself. Where he ranks himself next to the gods.
Rio is incredibly overrated on this forum, he had a lot of presence about him but his ball-playing skills are overhyped. He had a tendency to look good on the ball without being particularly great, also loved to play a long hoof to nowhere.
I've always pegged Vidic as the better defender of the two even if he didn't look as classy, but his strengths were tailor-made for this league. 08/09 season, he made Jonny Evans look like a world beater next to him. One of the most dominant season you'll ever see from a CB. His 2010/11 season is also under-rated.
I'd place Rio above Terry because he was more complete but Terrys longevity has him in for a great shout, he was on his last leg during Mourinho 2nd stint and still looked quality. My Top 5 would be:
1. Vidic
2. Rio
3. Terry
4. van Dijk
5. Kompany
van Dijk has only won 1 PL but I don't think any defender has had the season he had in 18/19, deserved to win Ballon d'Or that season. Looks very dominant still. Kompany is same, he was a quality defender for Man City when they started to win stuff. Great leader too
Because saying you are the best, regardless of whether it's true, makes you look like a tit.Why not? False modesty is annoying thing. IF he thinks that he is the best (and general opinion is that he has credentials to think that) then why not say it?
We do? . Damn, i didn't get that memo..I don't see how Chelsea fans could idolise someone as despicable and pathetic as John Terry. A racist, friend's wife shagger, crypto scammer who spits on players and comes out wearing a full kit with shin pads to celebrate a cup final he wasn't involved in. Imagine having that as a club legend. At least we've had the decency to not idolise Ryan Giggs anymore.
Based on his whole career, he doesStam doesn’t make any side ahead of VVD let’s be honest. He made 70 odd PL appearances.
Good times.
Based on his whole career, he does