Salt Bailly
Auburn, not Ginger.
Selby's feet are massive.
Absolutely and I like it. He used to be a bit more fun loving when he was younger, as he got older and realised he could go down as one of the best of all time then he got more serious. Ronnie could take noteI’m sure he used to be more of a jovial character when he was younger. I think he’s got more miserable in recent years which probably coincides with how good he has become
Jesters feetSelby's feet are massive.
.....unusual observationSelby's feet are massive.
Selby's feet are massive.
I’m sure he used to be more of a jovial character when he was younger. I think he’s got more miserable in recent years which probably coincides with how good he has become
Absolutely and I like it. He used to be a bit more fun loving when he was younger, as he got older and realised he could go down as one of the best of all time then he got more serious. Ronnie could take note
What a weird argument. I think Ronnie is doing fine with his 6 titles & universal recognition as the best ever player
Oh no disputing he’s the best, but his attitude is crap. Tell me you don’t cringe hearing a forty year old bloke come out saying, “it’s all a larf, innit, snooker....I just do it for a bit of fun” when he loses.What a weird argument. I think Ronnie is doing fine with his 6 titles & universal recognition as the best ever player
Oh no disputing he’s the best, but his attitude is crap. Tell me you don’t cringe hearing a forty year old bloke come out saying, “it’s all a larf, innit, snooker....I just do it for a bit of fun” when he loses.
Unfortunately that‘s a myth... I’ve got size 11 feetAre you insinuating he has something else which is rather massive ?
And a username that doesn't help the imageUnfortunately that‘s a myth... I’ve got size 11 feet
...I’m changing my nameAnd a username that doesn't help the image
Is it possible for snooker tables to have a fair amount of variance in the pockets from one tournament to the next?
Got to be honest it is something I know nothing about, but it does seem to me that the pockets at this year’s World Championship seem noticeably forgiving.
That might not be a bad thing, mind. Balls are flying in from all over and it has been a fantastic tournament to watch. On the other hand, is it easier than usual?
Seen so many balls hit the near jaw and then still somehow find their way into the pockets. Even the commentators have mentioned it on occasion - “can’t believe that’s gone in” - and I wonder if the way the table is playing has dictated tactics. Every player is going for every shot and I think the century record has been beaten as a result.
Very useful insight, thanks for that. Figured the pockets must be the same size with very tight tolerances, they just seem to be playing bigger. Now I know it must be the cushions, or my eyesight.Theres a number of factors which dictate the tables. If it’s particularly damp or humid venue they put a quicker cloth on (shorter nap) and firmer cushions which makes the pockets a bit less forgiving. The actual pockets are a standard size, it’s the cushions which decide if they’re forgiving or not.
Think they’ve softened the angles... those middle pockets look ridiculousVery useful insight, thanks for that. Figured the pockets must be the same size with very tight tolerances, they just seem to be playing bigger. Now I know it must be the cushions, or my eyesight.
@Pexbo is close to qualifying to next years WC.I struggle to see when someone who is not already a world champion will next win the title. Wilson is probably the only one who is close but even he has a lot of flaws which kind of show up against the best. This format means that you really have to be a top top player to have a sniff
@Pexbo is close to qualifying to next years WC.
Yeah Virgo hyped up the shot to say it was the pot to win the championship and then Selby played safe. Must be annoying for the players when they hear the laughter, even worse when it’s on the back swing sometimesAre the crowd listening to the BBC comms through headphones? Sure sounded like they reacted to the commentary directly then.